Scaffolding Critical Reading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.23Keywords:
critical reading, scaffolding, literary studies, reading across the curriculum, templatesAbstract
Teachers in any discipline where reading matters should practice a robust scaffolding pedagogy to teach critical reading, in contrast to the more common but less direct approaches that often leave students to learn or not learn these skills themselves. In this essay, I describe how to adapt established methods for teaching writing (including templates) to teaching reading. To answer critics who might find the approach too “reductive,” I turn to scaffolding theory, which calls for purposefully—but temporarily—reductive teaching. Finally, I present qualitative and quantitative evidence from three years of an American literature course to show how a scaffolding approach can help students read critically.
References
Adsit, Janelle. 2017. Toward an Inclusive Creative Writing: Threshold Concepts to Guide the Literary Writing Curriculum. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Anson, Chris M. 2017. “Writing to Read, Revisited.” What Is College Reading?, edited by Alice S. Horning, Deborah-Lee Gollnitz, and Cynthia R. Haller. The WAC Clearinghouse and University Press of Colorado, 21–37.
Apess, William. (1833) 1992. “An Indian’s Looking-Glass for the White Man.” On Our Own Ground: The Complete Writings of William Apess, a Pequot, edited by Barry O’Connell. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 155–61.
Arthur, Jason, and Anne Case-Halferty. 2008. “Review of They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing, by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein.” Composition Forum 18. compositionforum.com/issue/18/they-say-i-say-review.php.
Arum, Richard, and Josipa Roksa. 2011. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Banting, Sarah. 2014. “Uncomfortable Lessons in Literary Studies.” English Studies in Canada 40 (4): 4–8.
Bartholomae, David. 1985. “Inventing the University.” When a Writer Can’t Write: Studies in Writer’s Block and Other Composing Problems, edited by Mike Rose, 134–65. New York: Guilford Press.
Bean, John. 2011. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
Belenky, Mary F., Blythe McVicker Clinchy, Nancy Rule Goldberger, and Jill Mattuck Tarule. 1986. Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books.
Benay, Phyllis. 2008. “They Say, ‘Templates Are the Way to Teach Writing’; I Say, ‘Use with Extreme Caution.’” Pedagogy 8 (2): 369–73.
Birkenstein, Cathy, and Gerald Graff. 2008. “In Teaching Composition, ‘Formulaic’ Is Not a 4-Letter Word.” Chronicle of Higher Education, April 4, 2008.
Blau, Sheridan. 2003. The Literature Workshop: Teaching Texts and Their Readers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Bransford, John D., Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Broekhoff, Marne. 2008. “Templates for Academic Writing.” Nawa Journal of Language and Communication 2 (2): 129–39.
Bruns, Cristina V. 2011. Why Literature? The Value of Literary Reading and What It Means for Teaching. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Carillo, Ellen C., editor. 2021. Reading and Writing Instruction in the Twenty-First Century: Recovering and Transforming the Pedagogy of Robert Scholes. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Carillo, Ellen C. 2015. Securing a Place for Reading in Composition: The Importance of Teaching for Transfer. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Carillo, Ellen C., and Alice Horning, editors. 2021. Teaching Critical Reading and Writing in the Era of Fake News. New York: Peter Lang.
Chick, Nancy L., Holly Hassel, and Aeron Haynie. 2009. “‘Pressing an Ear against the Hive’: Reading Literature for Complexity.” Pedagogy (9) 3: 399–422.
Corrigan, Paul T. 2013/14. “Attending to the Act of Reading: Critical Reading, Contemplative Reading, and Active Reading.” Reader: Essays in Reader-Oriented Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy vols. 65–66: 146–73.
Corrigan, Paul T. 2017. “Oblivious Interpretation: Teaching Mark Twain’s ‘The War-Prayer.’” Teaching American Literature: A Journal of Theory and Practice 9 (1): 118–26.
Corrigan, Paul T. 2019. “Threshold Concepts in Literary Studies.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 7 (1): 3–17.
Corrigan, Paul T. 2014. “On Interpreting Literature Critically.” I Hear America Singing: An Anthology of Literature from the United States, 251–89.
Davis, Rebecca H. (1861) 1993. Life in the Iron Mills and Other Stories, 2nd ed. Feminist Press.
Diaz, Joanne T. 2012. “The Digital Archive as a Tool for Close Reading in the Undergraduate Literature Course.” Pedagogy 12 (3): 425–47.
Dickinson, Emily. 1862. “This World Is not Conclusion.” Poetry Foundation. http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/47653/this-world-is-not-conclusion-373.
Donahue, Patricia. 1987. “Misreading Students’ Texts.” The Reader 17: 1–12.
Edlund, John R. 2008. “Review of They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein.” California English 13 (1): 13.
Eyler, Josh. 2018. How Humans Learn: The Science and Stories of Effective College Teaching. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press.
Fahnestock, Jeanne, and Marie Secor. 1991. “The Rhetoric of Literary Criticism.” Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities, edited by Charles Bazerman and James G. Paradis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 77–96.
Far, Sui Sin. (1890) 1991. “In the Land of the Free.” Imagining America: Stories from the Promised Land, edited by Wesley Brown and Amy Ling. New York: Persea Books, 3–11.
Frey, Nancy, and Douglas Fisher. 2011. “Structuring the Talk: Ensuring Academic Conversations Matter.” Clearing House 84 (1): 15–20.
Graff, Gerald. 2004. Clueless in Academe: How Schooling Obscures the Life of the Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale UP.
Graff, Gerald, and Cathy Birkenstein. 2006. They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing. New York: Norton.
Grow, Laura M. 2008. “If They Say Academic Writing Is Too Hard, I Say Read Graff and Birkenstein.” Pedagogy 8 (2): 363–68.
Hass, Robert. 2010. “A Story about the Body.” The Apple Trees at Olema: New and Selected Poems. New York: Ecco Press.
Heinert, Jennifer, and Nancy Chick. 2016. “Reacting in Literary Studies: Crossing the Threshold from Quality to Meaning.” Arts & Humanities in Higher Education 16 (3): 320–30.
Helms, Josh W., and Kimberly T. Helms. 2010. “Note Launchers: Promoting Active Reading of Mathematics Textbooks.” Journal of College Reading and Learning 41 (1): 109–19.
Herrington, Anne J. 1998. “Teaching, Writing, and Learning: A Naturalistic Study of Writing in an Undergraduate Literature Course.” Writing in Academic Disciplines, edited by David A. Jolliffe, vol. 2. Ablex, 133–66.
Hmelo-Silver, Cindy, Ravit Golan Duncan, and Clark A. Chinn. 2007. “Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark.” Educational Psychologist 42 (2): 99–107.
Hoeft, Mary E. 2012. “Why University Students Don’t Read: What Professors Can Do to Increase Compliance.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (2): 1–19.
Hollrah, Matt, and Frank Farmer. 2007. “Templates, Moves, Rules of Thumb.” Review of They Say / l Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. Minnesota Review 69: 199–205.
Horning, Alice S. 2007. “Reading Across the Curriculum as the Key to Student Success.” Across the Disciplines 4. wac.colostate.edu/docs/atd/articles/horning2007.pdf.
Howard, Rebecca M., Tricia Serviss, and Tanya K. Rodrigue. 2010. “Writing from Sources, Writing from Sentences.” Writing and Pedagogy 2 (2): 177–92.
Hutchings, Bill, and Karen O’Rourke. 2002. “Problem-Based Learning in Literary Studies.” Arts & Humanities in Higher Education 1 (1): 73–83.
Jamieson, Sandra. 2013. “What Students’ Use of Sources Reveals about Advanced Reading Skills.” Across the Disciplines 10 (4). wac.colostate.edu/docs/atd/reading/jamieson.pdf.
Kalbfleisch, Elizabeth. 2016. “Imitatio Reconsidered: Notes Toward a Reading Pedagogy for the Writing Classroom.” Pedagogy 16 (1): 39–51.
Lancaster, Zak. 2016. “Do Academics Really Write This Way? A Corpus Investigation of Moves and Templates in ‘They Say/I Say.’” College Composition and Communication 67 (3): 437–64.
Linkon, Sherry L. 2011. Literary Learning: Teaching the English Major. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Luckenbill, Rachel. 2019. “Native Studies Across the Curriculum: Decolonizing the Classroom.” Humanities Research Colloquium, 29 Jan. 2019, Southeastern University, Lakeland, Florida.
Luxon, Thomas H. 2018. “Apprenticeship in Learning Design for Literature Courses.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 17 (2): 265–73.
Lynch-Biniek, Amy. 2009. “Filling in the Blanks: They Say, I Say, and the Persistence of Formalism.” CEA Forum 38 (2). files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1097776.pdf.
Manarin, Karen, Miriam Carey, Melanie Rathburn, and Glen Ryland. 2015. Critical Reading in Higher Education: Academic Goals and Social Engagement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Manarin, Karen. 2012. “Reading Value: Student Choice in Reading Strategies.” Pedagogy 12 (2): 281–97.
McKay, Claude. 1922. “Romance.” Harlem Shadows: The Poems of Claude McKay. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Company, 73.
Melzer, Dan. 2014. Assignments Across the Curriculum: A National Study of College Writing. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Mena, Maria Cristina. (1913) 1997. “The Gold Vanity Set.” The Collected Stories of Maria Cristina Mena (Recovering the U.S. Hispanic Literary Heritage), edited by Amy Doherty. Houston: Arte Publico Press.
Nathan, Rebekah. 2006. My Freshman Year: What a Professor Learned by Becoming a Student. New York: Penguin Books.
Okada, John. 1978. No-No Boy. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Owens, Kim H. 2009. “Teaching the Six.” Pedagogy 9 (3): 389–97.
Pea, Roy. 2004. “The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 (3): 423–51.
Perry, William G. 1999. Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
Puntambekar, Sadhana, and Roland Hübscher. 2005. “Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed?” Educational Psychologist 40 (1): 1–12.
Richards, Ivor A. 1929. Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. London: Harcourt, Brace, & Company.
Rose, Mike. 1989. Lives on the Boundary: A Moving Account of the Struggles and Achievements of America’s Educationally Underprepared. New York: Penguin Books.
Rosenblatt, Louise M. (1933) 1995. Literature as Exploration, 5th ed. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
Salvatori, Mariolina R., and Patricia Donahue. 2005. The Elements (and Pleasures) of Difficulty. New York: Pearson.
Salvatori, Mariolina R., and Patricia Donahue. 2012. “Stories About Reading: Appearance, Disappearance, Morphing, and Revival.” College English 75 (2): 199–217.
Saxton, Kirsten T., and Ajuan M. Mance. 2011. “From Skepticism to Measured Enthusiasm: The Story of Two Literary Scholars’ Introduction to Assessment in the Major.” Literary Study, Measurement, and the Sublime: Disciplinary Assessment, edited by Donna Heiland and Laura J. Rosenthal. The Teagle Foundation, 259–76.
Scholes, Robert. 2002. “The Transition to College Reading.” Pedagogy 2 (2): 165–72.
Scholes, Robert. 2011. English After the Fall: From Literature to Textuality. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
Schreibersdorf, Lisa. 2014. “Literary Discipline in the Margins: How Students Read Comments on Literature Papers.” Pedagogy 14 (3): 499–530.
Steinbeck, John. (1937) 1993. Of Mice and Men. New York: Penguin.
Sullivan, Patrick, Howard Tinberg, and Sheridan Blau, editors. 2017. Deep Reading: Teaching Reading in the Writing Classroom. National Council of Teachers of English.
Sword, Helen. 2012. Stylish Academic Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thomas, Paul L. 2017. “Writing as Discovery: When Process Defaults to Script.” Radical Eyes for Equity, 31 July 2017. radicalscholarship.wordpress.com/2017/07/31/writing-as-discovery-when-process-defaults-to-script/.
Tinkle, Theresa, Daphna Atias, Ruth M. McAdams, and Cordelia Zukerman. 2013. “Teaching Close Reading Skills in a Large Lecture Course.” Pedagogy 13 (3): 505–35.
Twain, Mark. (1905) 1992. “The War Prayer.” Mark Twain: Collected Tales, Sketches, Speeches, and Essays: Volume 2: 1891-1910, edited by Louis J. Budd. Washington, DC: Library of America, 652–55.
Van Gelder, Tim. 2005. “Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons from Cognitive Science.” College Teaching 53 (1): 41–46.
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Warner, Michael. 2004. “Uncritical Reading.” Polemic: Critical or Uncritical, edited by Jane Gallop. New York: Routledge, 11–38.
Warren, James E. 2006. “Literary Scholars Processing Poetry and Constructing Arguments.” Written Communication 23 (2): 202–26.
Weissman, Gary. 2016. The Writer in the Well: On Misreading and Rewriting Literature. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Wheatley, Phillis. 1773. “An Hymn to the Morning.” Bartleby. www.bartleby.com/150/15.html.
Whitman, Walt. 1865. “The Wound-Dresser.” Poetry Foundation. www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/53027/the-wound-dresser.
Wilder, Laura. 2012. Rhetorical Strategies and Genre Conventions in Literary Studies: Teaching and Writing in the Disciplines. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Wilder, Laura, and Joanna Wolfe. 2009. “Sharing the Tacit Rhetorical Knowledge of the Literary Scholar: The Effects of Making Disciplinary Conventions Explicit in Undergraduate Writing About Literature Courses.” Research in the Teaching of English 44 (2): 170–209.
Wilner, Arlene. 2005. “Asking for It: The Role of Assignment Design in Critical Literacy.” Reader: Essays in Reader-Oriented Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy 52 (1): 56–91.
Wilner, Arlene. 2020. Rethinking Reading in College: An Across-the-Curriculum Approach. Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of English.
Wolfe, Joanna. 2003. “A Method for Teaching Invention in the Gateway Literature Course.” Pedagogy 3 (3): 399–424.
Wolfe, Joanna, and Laura Wilder. 2016. Digging into Literature: Strategies for Reading, Analysis, and Writing. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Wood, David, Jerome S. Bruner, and Gail Ross. 1976. “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17 (2): 89–100.
Wood, Jack D., and Gianpiero Petriglieri. 2005. “Transcending Polarization: Beyond Binary Thinking.” Transactional Analysis Journal 35 (1): 31–39.
Yancey, Kathleen B. 2004. Teaching Literature as Reflective Practice. Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of English.
Young, Art, and Toby Fulwiler. 1995. When Writing Teachers Teach Literature: Bringing Writing to Reading. New York: Heinemann.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Paul T. Corrigan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
