Benefits of a Multi-institutional, Hybrid Approach to Teaching Course Design for Graduate Students, Postdoctoral Scholars, and Leaders

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.15

Keywords:

graduate student, postdoctoral scholar, hybrid, learning community, program assessment

Abstract

In this study, graduate students and postdoctoral scholars participated in a hybrid, multi-institutional workshop series about course design. Trainees developed college courses based on their research expertise, posting works-in-progress to a shared, online drive for peer review and collaboration. Learners also met weekly with local facilitators at their institution. The program led to similar learning outcomes as when the program was previously run in a face-to-face only format at one institution. However, the multi-institutional design led to additional benefits, especially for leaders at each institution, who described a rich learning community in their collaborative work.

Author Biographies

Darren S. Hoffmann, University of Iowa

Darren S. Hoffmann studies anatomy education and development of graduate students as Assistant Professor in the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology in the University of Iowa College of Medicine (USA).

Katherine Kearns, Indiana University Bloomington

Katherine Kearns supports development of graduate students and postdoctoral trainees as Assistant Vice Provost for Student Development in the University Graduate School at Indiana University Bloomington (USA).

Karen M. Bovenmyer, Iowa State University

Karen M. Bovenmyer is the Program Coordinator for the Preparing Future Faculty and Graduate Student Teaching Certificate programs at the Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching at Iowa State University (USA).

W. F. Preston Cumming, University of Colorado Boulder

W.F. Preston Cumming, Professional Development Lead in the Center for Teaching & Learning at the University of Colorado Boulder (USA), focuses on graduate student and postdoctoral fellow teacher development.

Leslie E. Drane, Indiana University Bloomington

Leslie E. Drane supports the teaching practices of graduate student and postdoctoral instructors as an Instructional Consultant at Indiana University Bloomington (USA).

Madeleine Gonin, Indiana University Bloomington

Madeleine Gonin helps instructors create more inclusive classes, particularly in STEM disciplines, as an Instructional Technology Consultant and STEM Specialist at Indiana University Bloomington (USA).

Lisa Kelly, University of Iowa

Lisa Kelly, CIRTL Coordinator at the University of Iowa (USA), facilitates improved pedagogy training for graduate students and consults on career exploration and preparation.

Lisa Rohde, University of Nebraska Lincoln

Lisa Rohde supports graduate teaching assistants as the Associate Director of Teaching and Research Development at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (USA).

Shawana Tabassum, Iowa State University

Shawana Tabassum studies sensors, micro/nano-optics, microfluidic devices, and applications in biomedicine/agriculture as Assistant Professor in Electrical Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler (USA).

Riley Blay, University of Iowa

Riley Blay is a Master’s of Clinical Anatomy graduate student from the University of Iowa (USA).

References

Abeysekera, Lakmal, and Phillip Dawson. 2015. “Motivation and Cognitive Load in the Flipped Classroom: Definition, Rationale and a Call for Research.” Higher Education Research and Development 34, no. 1: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336.

Adams, Kathrynn A. 2002. What Colleges and Universities Want in New Faculty [Occasional paper]. Number 7. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Austin, Ann E. 2002. “Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career.” Journal of Higher Education 73, no. 1: 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777132.

Austin, Ann E., Henry Campa, Christine Pfund, Donald L. Gillian-Daniel, Robert Mathieu, and Judith Stoddart. 2009. “Preparing STEM Doctoral Students for Future Careers.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 117: 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.346.

Bishop-Williams, Katherine E., Kaitlin Roke, Erin Aspenlieder, and Meagan Troop. 2017. “Graduate Student Perspectives of Interdisciplinary and Disciplinary Programming for Teaching Development.” Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 8, no. 3: 11. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.3.11.

Boice, Robert. 1991. “New Faculty as Teachers.” The Journal of Higher Education 62, no. 2: 150–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1991.11774113.

Bowden, Randall. 2012. “Online Graduate Education: Developing Scholars through Asynchronous Discussion.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 24, no. 1: 42–64.

Boyer, Ernest L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bruff, Derek O., Douglas H. Fisher, Kathryn E. McEwen, and Blaine E. Smith. 2013. “Wrapping a MOOC: Student Perceptions of an Experiment in Blended Learning.” Journal of Online Teaching and Learning 9, no. 2: 187–99. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/bruff_0613.htm.

Condon, William, Ellen R. Iverson, Cathryn A. Manduca, Carol Rutz, and Gudrun Willett. 2016. Faculty Development and Student Learning: Assessing the Connections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Connolly, Mark R., You-Geon Lee, and Julia N. Savoy. 2018. “The Effects of Doctoral Teaching Development on Early-Career STEM Scholars’ College Teaching Self-Efficacy.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 17, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-02-0039.

Connolly, Mark R., Julia N. Savoy, You-Geon Lee, and Lucas B. Hill. 2016. Building a Better Future STEM Faculty: How Doctoral Teaching Programs Can Improve Undergraduate Education. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Cox, Milton D., and Jacquie McDonald. 2017. “Faculty Learning Communities and Communities of Practice Dreamers, Schemers, and Seamers.” In Communities of Practice, edited by J. McDonald and A. Cater-Steel. Singapore: Springer.

Creswell, John W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among the Five Approaches, 77–83. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Fairweather, James S., and Robert A. Rhoads. 1995. “Teaching and the Faculty Role: Enhancing the Commitment to Instruction in American Colleges and Universities.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17, no. 2: 179–94. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737017002179.

Felder, Richard M., Rebecca Brent, and Michael J. Prince. 2011. “Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations.” Journal of Engineering Education 100, no. 1: 89–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00005.x.

Feldon, David F., James Peugh, Briana E. Timmerman, Michelle A. Maher, Melissa Hurst, Denise Strickland, Joanna A. Gilmore and Cindy Stiegelmeyer. 2011. “Graduate Students’ Teaching Experiences Improve Their Methodological Research Skills.” Science 333, no. 6045: 1037–39. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204109.

Fink, Dee, and Melissa Ganus. 2009. “Designing Significant Learning Experiences.” In Aspiring Academics: A Resource Book for Graduate Students and Early Career Faculty, edited by Michael Solem, Kenneth Foote, and Janice Monk, 70–85. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Fleet, Christine M., Meredith F. N. Rosser, Rebecca A. Zufall, Marney C. Pratt, Tracy S. Feldman, and Paula P. Lemons. 2006. “Hiring Criteria in Biology Departments of Academic Institutions.” BioScience 56, no. 5: 430–36. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0430:HCIBDO]2.0.CO;2.

Golde, Chris M., and Timothy M. Dore. 2001. At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Today’s Doctoral Students Reveal about Doctoral Education. Philadelphia: Pew Charitable Trusts.

Hill, Lucas B., Julia N. Savoy, Ann E. Austin, and Bipana Bantawa, B. 2019. “The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL.” Innovative Higher Education 44: 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-9461-7.

Hoffmann, Darren S., and Susan Lenoch. 2013. “Teaching Your Research: A Workshop to Teach Curriculum Design to Graduate Students and Post-doctoral Fellows.” Medical Science Educator 23, no. 3: 336–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341645.

Huisman, Bart, Nadira Saab, Jan van Driel, and Paul van den Broek. 2018. “Peer Feedback on Academic Writing: Undergraduate Students’ Peer Feedback Role, Peer Feedback Perceptions and Essay Performance.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43, no. 6: 955–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318.

Irons, Alastair. 2008. Enhancing Learning through Formative Assessment and Feedback. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934333.

Jordan, Katy. 2013. “MOOC Completion Rates: The Data.” [Website]. Retrieved from: http://www.katyjordan.com/MOOCproject.html.

Kabes, Sharon, Dennis Lamb, and John Engstrom. 2010. “Graduate Learning Communities: Transforming Educators.” Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC) 7, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v7i5.121.

Kirkpatrick, Donald L., and James D. Kirkpatrick. 2006. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Kizilcec, René F., Chris Piech, and Emily Schneider. 2013. “Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses.” In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 170–79.

Kulkarni, Chinmay, Julia Cambre, Yasmine Kotturi, Michael S. Bernstein, and Scott Klemmer. 2016. “Talkabout: Making Distance Matter with Small Groups in Massive Classes.” Design Thinking Research, 67–92. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2675133.2675166.

Li, Nan, Himanshu Verma, Afroditi Skevi, Guillaume Zufferey, Jan Blom, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2014. “Watching MOOCs Together: Investigating Co-located MOOC Study Groups.” Distance Education 35, no. 2: 217–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917708.

Macleod, Hamish, Jeff Haywood, Amy Woodgate, and Mubarak Alkhatnai. 2014. “Emerging Patterns in MOOCs: Learners, Course Designs and Directions.” TechTrends 59, no. 1: 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0821-y.

Marincovich, Michele, Jack Prostko, and Frederic Stout. (eds.). 1998. The Professional Development of Graduate Teaching Assistants. Bolton, MA: Anker.

Onah, Daniel F. O., Jane Sinclair, and Russell Boyatt. 2014. “Dropout Rates of Massive Open Online Courses: Behavioral Patterns.” EDULEARN14 Proceedings 8525-34. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2402.0009.

Palmer, Michael S. 2011. “Graduate Student Professional Development: A Decade After Calls for National Reform.” In Studies in Graduate and Professional Student Development 14, edited by Laura L. B. Border, 1–18. New Forums Press: Stillwater, OK.

Palmer, Michael S., Adriana C. Streifer, Stacy Williams-Duncan. 2016. “Systematic Assessment of a High-Impact Course Design Institute.” To Improve the Academy 35 no. 2: 339–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/tia2.20041.

Parr, Chris. 2013. “MOOC Completion Rates ‘Below 7 %’.” Retrieved from: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/mooc-completion-rates-below-7/2003710.article.

Seaton, Daniel T., Yoav Bergner, Isaac Chuang, Piotr Mitros, and David E. Pritchard. 2014. “Who Does What in a Massive Open Online Course?” Communications of the ACM 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500876.

Shortlidge, Erin E., and Sarah L. Eddy. 2018. “The Trade-Off between Graduate Student Research and Teaching: A Myth?” PLOS One 13, no. 6 e0199576. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199576.

Skeff, Kelley M., Georgetite A. Stratos, and Merlynn R. Bergen. 1992. “Evaluation of a Medical Faculty Development Program: A Comparison of Traditional Pre/Post and Retrospective Pre/Post Self-Assessment Ratings.” Evaluation & the Health Professions 15, no. 3: 350–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/016327879201500307.

Tice, Stacey Lane. 1997. The Relationships between Faculty Preparation Programs and Teaching Assistant Development Programs [Occasional paper] Number 4. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Trigwell, Keith. 2013. “Evidence of the Impact of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Purposes.” Teaching and Learning Inquiry 1, no. 1: 95–105. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.95.

Wenger, Etienne. 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wiggins, Grant, and Jay McTighe. 2005. Understanding by Design. 5th ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Yang, Miao, Richard Badger, and Yu Zhen. 2006. “A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback in a Chinese EFL Writing Class.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15, no. 3: 179–200. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004.

Yarbro Jessica, Kari M. Arfstrom, Katherine McKnight, and Patrick McKnight. 2014. Extension of a Review of Flipped Learning. 1st Ed. Fairfax, VA: Flipped Learning Network, Pearson, George Mason University. https://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Extension-of-FLipped-Learning-LIt-Review-June-2014.pdf.

Zheng, Zhilin, Tim Vogelsang, and Niels Pinkwart, N. 2015. “The Impact of Small Learning Group Composition on Student Engagement and Success in a MOOC.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Educational Data Mining, 500–503.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-07

How to Cite

Hoffmann, Darren S., Katherine Kearns, Karen M. Bovenmyer, W. F. Preston Cumming, Leslie E. Drane, Madeleine Gonin, Lisa Kelly, Lisa Rohde, Shawana Tabassum, and Riley Blay. 2021. “Benefits of a Multi-Institutional, Hybrid Approach to Teaching Course Design for Graduate Students, Postdoctoral Scholars, and Leaders”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 9 (1):218-40. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.15.