Visions of the Possible: Engaging with Librarians in SoTL

Keywords: Collaboration, scholarship of teaching and learning, librarianship, cross-disciplinary, engagement

Abstract

This article encourages thoughtful discussion on cross-disciplinary partnerships among those researchers, practitioners, and librarians engaged in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Through personal experiences, examples from the literature, and the goal of meaningful collaboration, the authors describe four models of engagement with librarians in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. We propose that it is time for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and its practitioners to more fully engage with librarians because they bring complementary perspectives, powerful areas of expertise, and significant insights into students’ learning experiences.

Author Biographies

Caitlin McClurg, University of Calgary

Caitlin McClurg is an associated librarian for teaching and learning at the University of Calgary (CAN). She is currently supporting engineering and geoscience subject areas.

Margy MacMillan, Mount Royal University

Margy MacMillan is a retired librarian and professor emerita of Mount Royal University (CAN), who is still playing in the busy intersection of SoTL and librarianship.

Nancy Chick, Rollins College

Nancy Chick is Co-President Elect (with Chng Huang Hoon) of the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and Director of the Endeavor Foundation Center for Faculty Development at Rollins College in Winter Park, Florida (USA).

References

Bernstein, D. (2013). How SoTL-active faculty members can be cosmopolitan assets to an institution. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.35

Bernstein, D., & Bass, R. (2005). The scholarship of teaching and learning. Academe, 91(4), 37-43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40253429

Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bradley, C. (2009). The scholarship of teaching and learning opportunities for librarians. College & Research Libraries News, 70(5), 276-278. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.70.5.8181

Chick, N., Poole, G., & Blackman, G. (under review). Building the field: peer reviewers in the scholarship of teaching and learning.

Dunne, S. (2016). How do they research? An ethnographic study of final year undergraduate research behavior in an Irish university. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2016.1168747

Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121

Foster, B., Doyle, M., & Yukmenko, M. (2018). Student Perceptions of Information Literacy Skills (PILS) using the ACRL’s Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved from http://repository.library.fresnostate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.3/201211/_Perception%20of%20Information%20Literacy%20Skills%20%28PILS%29.pdf?sequence=1

Hoseth, A. (2009). Library participation in a campus-wide teaching program. Reference Services Review, 37(4), 371-385.

Hutchings, P. (2000). Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Huber, M. & Hutchings, P. (2005). The advancement of learning: Building the teaching commons. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hutchings, P., & Huber, M. T. (2008a). Editorial: The place—and problem—of theory. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(3), 227-228. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1474022208094408

Hutchings, P., & Huber, M.T. (2008b). Placing theory in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 7(3), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022208094409

Kanuka, H. (2011). Interaction and the online distance classroom: Do instructional methods effect the quality of interaction? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2-3), 143-156.

Knapp, J. A. (2012). Plugging the “whole”: Librarians as interdisciplinary facilitators. Library Review, 61(3), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531211259328

Kuhlthau, C. C. (1994). Students and the information search process: Zones of intervention for librarians. In I. P. Godden (Ed.), Advances in librarianship. Advances in librarianship 18 (pp. 57-72). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

MacMillan, M., & MacKenzie, A. (2012). Strategies for integrating information literacy and academic literacy: Helping undergraduate students make the most of scholarly articles. Library Management, 33(8/9), 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211279885

Manarin, K., Carey, M., Rathburn, M., & Ryland, G. (2015). Critical reading in higher education: Academic goals and social engagement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.

Middendorf, J., & Pace, D. (2004). Decoding the disciplines: A model for helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(98), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.142

Otto, P. (2014). Librarians, libraries, and the scholarship of teaching and learning. New .Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2014(139), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20106

Pace, D. (2004). The amateur in the operating room: History and the scholarship of teaching and learning. American Historical Review, 109(4), 1171-1192. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/109.4.1171

Perruso Brown, C., & Kingsley-Wilson, B. (2010). Assessing organically: turning an assignment into an assessment. Reference Services Review, 38(4), 536-556. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321011090719

Poole, G., & Chick, N. (2016). On the nature of expertise in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.

Rosenblatt, S. (2010). They can find it but they don’t know what to do with it: Describing the use of scholarly literature by undergraduate students. Journal of information literacy, 4(2), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.11645/4.2.1486

Simmons, M. H. (2005). Librarians as disciplinary discourse mediators: Using genre theory to move toward critical information literacy. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 5(3), 297-311.

Simmons, N., Abrahamson, E., Deshler, J., Kensington-Miller, B., Manarin, K., Morón-García, S., Oliver, C., & Renc-Roe, J. (2013). Conflicts and configurations in a liminal space: SoTL scholars’ identity development. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(2), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.9

Taylor, K. L. (2010). Understanding the disciplines within the context of educational development. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 2010(122), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.398

Townsend, L., Brunetti, K., & Hofer, A. R. (2011). Threshold concepts and information literacy. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(3), 853-869. http://muse.jhu.edu/article/444661

Willson, R. (2012). Independent searching during one-shot information literacy instruction sessions: Is it an effective use of time? Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(4), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.18438/B85323

Wishkoski, R., Lundstrom, K., & Davis, E. (2019). Faculty teaching and librarian-facilitated assignment design. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 19(1), 95-126. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/article/715617

Published
2019-09-16
How to Cite
McClurg, C., MacMillan, M., & Chick, N. (2019). Visions of the Possible: Engaging with Librarians in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 7(2), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.1