Visions of the possible: Engaging with librarians in the scholarship of teaching and learning
This article encourages thoughtful discussion on cross-disciplinary partnerships among those researchers, practitioners, and librarians engaged in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Through personal experiences, examples from the literature, and the goal of meaningful collaboration, the authors describe four models of engagement with librarians in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. We propose that it is time for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and its practitioners to more fully engage with librarians because they bring complementary perspectives, powerful areas of expertise, and significant insights into students’ learning experiences.
Bernstein, D. (2013). How SoTL-active faculty members can be cosmopolitan assets to an institution. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.35
Bernstein, D., & Bass, R. (2005). The scholarship of teaching and learning. Academe, 91(4), 37-43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40253429
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bradley, C. (2009). The scholarship of teaching and learning opportunities for librarians. College & Research Libraries News, 70(5), 276-278. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.70.5.8181
Chick, N., Poole, G., & Blackman, G. (under review). Building the field: peer reviewers in the scholarship of teaching and learning.
Dunne, S. (2016). How do they research? An ethnographic study of final year undergraduate research behavior in an Irish university. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2016.1168747
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121
Foster, B., Doyle, M., & Yukmenko, M. (2018). Student Perceptions of Information Literacy Skills (PILS) using the ACRL’s Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved from http://repository.library.fresnostate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.3/201211/_Perception%20of%20Information%20Literacy%20Skills%20%28PILS%29.pdf?sequence=1
Hoseth, A. (2009). Library participation in a campus-wide teaching program. Reference Services Review, 37(4), 371-385.
Hutchings, P. (2000). Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Huber, M. & Hutchings, P. (2005). The advancement of learning: Building the teaching commons. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hutchings, P., & Huber, M. T. (2008a). Editorial: The place—and problem—of theory. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(3), 227-228. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1474022208094408
Hutchings, P., & Huber, M.T. (2008b). Placing theory in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 7(3), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022208094409
Kanuka, H. (2011). Interaction and the online distance classroom: Do instructional methods effect the quality of interaction? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2-3), 143-156.
Knapp, J. A. (2012). Plugging the “whole”: Librarians as interdisciplinary facilitators. Library Review, 61(3), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531211259328
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1994). Students and the information search process: Zones of intervention for librarians. In I. P. Godden (Ed.), Advances in librarianship. Advances in librarianship 18 (pp. 57-72). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
MacMillan, M., & MacKenzie, A. (2012). Strategies for integrating information literacy and academic literacy: Helping undergraduate students make the most of scholarly articles. Library Management, 33(8/9), 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211279885
Manarin, K., Carey, M., Rathburn, M., & Ryland, G. (2015). Critical reading in higher education: Academic goals and social engagement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.
Middendorf, J., & Pace, D. (2004). Decoding the disciplines: A model for helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(98), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.142
Otto, P. (2014). Librarians, libraries, and the scholarship of teaching and learning. New .Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2014(139), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20106
Pace, D. (2004). The amateur in the operating room: History and the scholarship of teaching and learning. American Historical Review, 109(4), 1171-1192. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/109.4.1171
Perruso Brown, C., & Kingsley-Wilson, B. (2010). Assessing organically: turning an assignment into an assessment. Reference Services Review, 38(4), 536-556. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321011090719
Poole, G., & Chick, N. (2016). On the nature of expertise in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.
Rosenblatt, S. (2010). They can find it but they don’t know what to do with it: Describing the use of scholarly literature by undergraduate students. Journal of information literacy, 4(2), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.11645/4.2.1486
Simmons, M. H. (2005). Librarians as disciplinary discourse mediators: Using genre theory to move toward critical information literacy. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 5(3), 297-311.
Simmons, N., Abrahamson, E., Deshler, J., Kensington-Miller, B., Manarin, K., Morón-García, S., Oliver, C., & Renc-Roe, J. (2013). Conflicts and configurations in a liminal space: SoTL scholars’ identity development. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(2), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.9
Taylor, K. L. (2010). Understanding the disciplines within the context of educational development. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 2010(122), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.398
Townsend, L., Brunetti, K., & Hofer, A. R. (2011). Threshold concepts and information literacy. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(3), 853-869. http://muse.jhu.edu/article/444661
Willson, R. (2012). Independent searching during one-shot information literacy instruction sessions: Is it an effective use of time? Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(4), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.18438/B85323
Wishkoski, R., Lundstrom, K., & Davis, E. (2019). Faculty teaching and librarian-facilitated assignment design. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 19(1), 95-126. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/article/715617
Copyright (c) 2019 Caitlin McClurg, Margy MacMillan, Nancy Chick
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.