“Epic-Genetics”: An exploration of preservice helping professionals’ (mis)understanding of epigenetic influences on human development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.1.9Keywords:
epigenetics, misconceptions, motivation, human development, educational psychologyAbstract
Mental health researchers emphasize the importance of practitioner understanding of biology-environment interplay. Accordingly, our goal of the study described in this article was to understand students’ preconceptions and misconceptions about biological and environmental influences on development through investigating their conceptions of epigenetics. Using a short-term longitudinal design, we explored preservice helping professionals’ conceptions and misconceptions pertaining to epigenetics within the framework of a graduate level human development course. Baseline knowledge about epigenetics was low. Students developed multiple misconceptions about epigenetics and how the phenomenon relates to biological and environmental influences on human development. Students reported feeling highly efficacious for detecting and resolving misconceptions related to biology-environment interactions but varied in their perceptions of interest for learning about the content. Findings support the use of open-ended questions to detect misconceptions about epigenetics and are discussed in light of how to teach students about this phenomenon. Overall, this research speaks to the importance of understanding the misconceptions students believe and instructional strategies that may assist in correcting them.
Metrics
References
Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20099
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Schulze, S. K. (1994). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 313-337. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031002313
Badenhorst, E., Mamede, S., Hartman, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2015). Exploring lecturers’ views of first-year health science students’ misconceptions in biomedical domains. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(2), 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9535-3
Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3, 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1490798
Balkissoon, R., Blossfield, K., Salud, L., Ford, D., & Pugh, C. (2009). Lost in translation: unfolding medical students’ misconceptions of how to perform a clinical digital rectal examination. The American Journal of Surgery, 197(4), 525-532 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.025
Barbier, E., Johnstone, A. L., Khomtchouk, B. B., Tapocik, J. D., Pitcairn, C., Rehman, F., . . . Heilig, M. (2017). Dependence-induced increase of alcohol self-administration and compulsive drinking mediated by the histone methyltransferase PRDM2. Molecular Psychiatry, 22(12), 1746-1758. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2016.131
Bensley, D. A., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2017). Psychological misconceptions: Recent scientific advances and unresolved issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 377-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417699026
Bernier, A., Matte-Gagné, C., & Bouvette-Turcot, A. A. (2014). Examining the interface of children’s sleep, executive functioning, and caregiving relationships: A plea against silos in the study of biology, cognition, and relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(4), 284-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414534852
Bonasio, R., Tu, S., & Reinberg, D. (2010). Molecular signals of epigenetic states. Science, 330(6004), 612-616. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1191078
Brumby, M. N. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68(4), 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730680412
Cacioppo, J. T. (2013). Psychological science in the 21st century. Teaching of Psychology, 40(4), 304-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628313501041
Champagne, F. A., & Mashoodh, R. (2009). Genes in context: Gene–environment interplay and the origins of individual differences in behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 127-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01622.x
Chi, M. T. H, & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 3-27). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2009). Conceptual change—Multiple routes, multiple mechanisms: A commentary on Ohlsson (2009). Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 48-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520802616291
Cordova, J. R., Sinatra, G. M., Jones, S. H., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Lombardi, D. (2014). Confidence in prior knowledge, self-efficacy, interest and prior knowledge: Influences on conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 164-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.006
diSessa, A. A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In R. K.
Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 265–281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dodge, K. A. (2004). The nature-nurture debate and public policy. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(4), 418-427. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23096214
Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3302&3_5
Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00509.x
Feder, A., Nestler, E. J., & Charney, D. S. (2009). Psychobiology and molecular genetics of resilience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 446-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2649
Feil, R., & Fraga, M. F. (2012). Epigenetics and the environment: Emerging patterns and implications. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13, 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3142
Furnham, A., & Hughes, D. J. (2014). Myths and misconceptions in popular psychology: Comparing psychology students and the general public. Teaching of Psychology, 41(3), 256-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628314537984
Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10(1), 61-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268308559905
Heijmans, B. T., Tobi, E. W., Stein, A. D., Putter, H., Blauw, G. J., Susser, E. S., . . . Lumey, L. H. (2008). Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(44), 17046-17049. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806560105
Henikoff, S., & Greally, J. M. (2016). Epigenetics, cellular memory and gene regulation. Current Biology, 26, R644-R648. Retrieved from https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(16)30623-6.pdf
Hughes, S., Lyddy, F., & Lambe, S. (2013). Misconceptions about psychological science: A review. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 12(1), 20-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/plat.2013.12.1.20
Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K. (2009). The effect of refuting misconceptions in the introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902959986
Kuhle, B. X., Barber, J. M., & Bristol, A. S. (2009). Predicting students’ performance in introductory psychology from their psychology misconceptions. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(2), 119-124.
Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In R. M. Lerner, W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed.): Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 1-17). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012). Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. American Psychologist, 67(2), 111-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023963
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Ruscio, J., & Beyerstein, B. L. (2010). Mythbusting in introductory psychology courses: The whys and the hows. In S. A. Meyers, J. R. Stowell, S. A. Meyers, J. R. Stowell (Eds.), Essays from “E-xcellence in Teaching” (Vol. 9, pp. 55-61.) Retrieved from http://teachpsych.org/Resources/Documents/ebooks/eit2009.pdf
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Pugh, K. J., Koskey, K. L. K., & Stewart, V. C. (2012). Developing conceptual understanding of natural selection: The role of interest, efficacy, and basic prior knowledge. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.559491
Lyddy, F., & Hughes, S. (2012). Attitudes toward psychology as a science and the persistence of psychological misconceptions in psychology undergraduates. In S. McCarthy, K. L. Dickson, J. Cranny, A. Trapp, & V. Karandashev (Eds.), Teaching Psychology around the World (Vol. 3, pp. 330-349. Newcastle upon Tune: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Meaney, M. J. (2001). Nature, nurture, and the disunity of knowledge. Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences, 935(1), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03470.x
Meaney, M. J., & Szyf, M. (2005). Environmental programming of stress responses through
DNA methylation: Life at the interface between a dynamic environment and a fixed genome. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 7(2), 103-123. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181727/
Morris, C. V., DiNieri, J. A., Szutorisz, H., & Hurd, Y. L. (2011). Molecular mechanisms of maternal cannabis and cigarette use on human neurodevelopment. European Journal of Neuroscience, 34(10), 1574-1583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07884.x
Nestler, E. J., Peña, C. J., Kundakovic, M., Mitchell, A., & Akbarian, S. (2016). Epigenetic basis of mental illness. Neuroscientist, 22 (5), 447-463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858415608147
Park, A. (2015, June 8). Explaining “epigenetics”: The health buzzword you need to know. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/3911161/explaining-epigenetics-the-health-buzzword-you-need-to-know/
Peter, C. J., Fischer, L. K., Kundakovic, M., Garg, P., Jakovcevski, M., Dincer, A., . . . Akbarian, S. (2016). DNA methylation signatures of early childhood malnutrition associated with impairments in attention and cognition. Biological Psychiatry, 80(10), 765-774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.03.2100
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1170472
Robison, A. J., & Nestler, E. J. (2011). Transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of addiction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 623-637. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3111
Rogoff, B., & Wertsch, J.W. (Eds.). (1984). Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Roseboom, T. J., De Rooij, S., & Painter, R. (2006). The Dutch famine and its long-term consequences for adult health. Early Human Development, 82(8), 485-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.07.001
Roseboom, T. J., Painter, R. C., Van Abeelen, A. F., Veenendaal, M. V., & De Rooij, S. R. (2011). Hungry in the womb: What are the consequences? Lessons from the Dutch famine. Maturitas, 70, 141-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.06.017
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 32, 37-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.002
Saçkes, M., Trundle, K. C., Tuckman, B. Q., & Krissek, L. A. (2012). Development of the
efficacy beliefs for conceptual change learning questionnaire. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(4), 338-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.600355
Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 13-27). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016619705184
Sheldon, J. P. (2018). Incorporating a discussion of genetic attributions into psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 45(1), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317745463
Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The “warming trend” in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 107-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_5
Sonuga-Barke, E. J. (2010). ‘It’s the environment stupid!’ On epigenetics, programming and plasticity in child mental health. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(2), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02213.x
Spencer, J. P., Blumberg, M. S., McMurray, B., Robinson, S. R., Samuelson, L. K., & Tomblin, J. B. (2009). Short arms and talking eggs: Why we should no longer abide the nativist–empiricist debate. Child Development Perspectives, 3(2), 79-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00081.x
Thompson, F., & Logue, S. (2006). An exploration of common student misconceptions in science. International Education Journal, 7(4), 553-559. Retrieved from http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/education/iej/articles/mainframe.htm
Thompson, R. A., & Zamboanga, B. L. (2004). Academic aptitude and prior knowledge as predictors of student achievement in introduction to psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 778-784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.778
Tobi, E. W., Goeman, J. J., Monajemi, R., Gu, H., Putter, H., Zhang, Y., . . . Heijmans, B. T. (2014). DNA methylation signatures link prenatal famine exposure to growth and metabolism. Nature Communications, 5, 5592-5605. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6592
Tomasiewicz, H. C., Jacobs, M. M., Wilkinson, M. B., Wilson, S. P., Nestler, E. J., & Hurd, Y. L. (2012). Proenkephalin mediates the enduring effects of adolescent cannabis exposure associated with adult opiate vulnerability. Biological Psychiatry, 72(10), 803-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.026
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Kate E. Snyder, Caroline M. Pittard, Allison Fowler, Corey T. Watson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
