Writing Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Articles for Peer-Reviewed Journals

Keywords: Keywords, SoTL, academic journal writing, SoTL identity, writing genres, writing as a value-based process, discourse conversational communities

Abstract

There are many general books and articles on publishing in peer-reviewed journals, but few specifically address issues around writing for journals focused on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). One of the challenges of beginning to write about teaching and learning is that most scholars have become interested in exploring these issues in higher education alongside their disciplinary interests and have to grapple with a new literature and sometimes unfamiliar methods and genres, as well. Hence, for many, as they write about their projects, they are simultaneously forging their identities as scholars of teaching and learning. We discuss the process of producing four types of SoTL-focused writing for peer-reviewed journals: empirical research articles, conceptual articles, reflective essays, and opinion pieces. Our goal is to support both new and experienced scholars of teaching and teaching—faculty/academics, professional staff, and students—as they nurture and further develop their voices and their identities as scholars of teaching and learning and strive to contribute to the enhancement of learning and teaching in higher education. We pose three related sets of overarching questions for consideration when writing about teaching and learning for peer-reviewed journals and offer heuristic frameworks for publishing in the four specific writing genres listed above. We also discuss how to get started with writing, preparing to submit, and responding to reviewers, focusing on the importance of contributing to and creating scholarly conversations about teaching and learning. Finally, using the metaphor of being in conversation, we argue that writing is a values-based process that contributes to the identity formation of scholars of teaching and learning and their sense of belonging within the SoTL discourse community.

Author Biographies

Mick Healey, Healey HE ConsultantsUniversity of Gloucestershire

Mick Healey is a higher education consultant and an Emeritus Professor at the University of Gloucestershire (UK).

Kelly E Matthews, University of Queensland

Kelly E Matthews is an Associate Professor in Higher Education at the University of Queensland (AUS).

Alison Cook-Sather, BRYN MAWR COLLEGE

Alison Cook-Sather is Mary Katharine Woodworth Professor of Education at Bryn Mawr College and Director of the Teaching and Learning Institute at Bryn Mawr and Haverford Colleges (USA).

References

Belcher, W. L. (2009). Writing your journal articles in 12 weeks: A guide to academic publishing success. Thousand Islands, CA: Sage.

Bindra, G., Easwaran, K., Firasta, L., Hirsch, M., Kapoor, A., Sosnowski, A., Stec-Marksman, T., & Vatansever, G. (2018). Increasing representation and equity in students as partners initiatives. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3536

Black, D., Brown, S., Day, A., & Race, P. (1998). 500 tips for getting published: A guide for educators, researchers and professionals. London: Kogan Page.

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Brookfield, S. D. (2011). Addressing feedback from reviewers and editors. In T. S. Rocco, & T. Hatcher (Eds.), The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing (pp. 251-261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Brost, C., Lauture, C., Smith, K., & Kersten, S. (2018). Reflections on that-has-been: Snapshots from the students-as-partners movement. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 130-135. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3366

Chick, N. L., Cornell-Swanson, L. V., Lazarides, K., & Meyers, R. (2014). Reconciling apples & oranges: A constructivist SoTL writing program. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080213

Chick, N. & Felten, P. (2018). How to tell a true SoTL story. In ISSOTL18 Toward a Learning Culture: Program and book of abstracts (p.193). Retrieved from https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/files/144403358/ISSOTL18_program_book.pdf

Chick, N., & Poole, G. (2013). Launching TLI: SoTL’s purposes, processes, and people. Editors’ introduction. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.1

Chick, N., & Poole, G. (2018). Editors’ introduction: In defense of microscopes. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 6(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.1.1

Cook-Sather, A. (2015). Dialogue across differences of position, perspective, and identity: Reflective practice in/on a student-faculty pedagogical partnership program. Teachers College Record, 117(2). http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=17784

Cook-Sather, A., Abbot, S., & Felten, P. (2019). Legitimizing reflective writing in SoTL: “Dysfunctional illusions of rigor” revisited. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 7(2), (this issue). https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.2

Day, A. (2016). How to get research published in journals. (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121

Fisher, R., Ross, B., LaFerriere, R., & Maritz, A. (2017). Flipped learning, flipped satisfaction, getting the balance right. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.9.

Goldsmith, M., Hanscom, M., Throop, S., & Young, C. (2017). Growing student-faculty partnerships at Ursinus College: A brief history in dialogue. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3075

Grant, B. M. (2016). Getting my work out there: Writing the journal article. In C. Sugrue, & S. Mertkan (Eds.), Publishing and the academic world: Passion, purpose and possible futures (pp. 75-89). London: Routledge.

Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook. London: Routledge.

Healey, M. (2000). Developing the scholarship of teaching through the disciplines. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943600445637

Healey, M. (2003). The scholarship of teaching: Issues around an evolving concept. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14(2/3), 5-26. Retrieved from http://celt.miamioh.edu/ject/issue.php?v=14&n=2%20and%203

Healey, M. (2017). Reflections on the development of International Collaborative Writing Groups (ICWGs) about teaching and learning in higher education. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(3). Article 3 https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.2.3

Healey, M., & Healey, R. L. (2018). “It depends”: Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472

Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2003). Discipline-based educational development. In H. Eggins, & R. Macdonald (Eds.), The scholarship of academic development (pp. 47-57). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Healey, M., Matthews, K.E., & Cook-Sather, A. (in press). Writing about learning and teaching in higher education: Creating and contributing to public scholarly conversations across a range of genres. Elon, NC: Elon University Center for Engaged Learning Open-Access Books.

Healey, R. L., Lerczak, A., Welsh, K., & France, D. (2019). By any other name? The impacts of differing assumptions, expectations, and misconceptions in bringing about resistance to staff-student “partnerships.” International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 106-122. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3550

Huber, M. T. and Hutchings, P. (2005). The advancement of learning: Building the Teaching Commons. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Johnstone, K., Marquis, E., & Puri, V. (2018). Public pedagogy and representations of higher education in popular film: New ground for the scholarship of teaching and learning. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 6(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.1.4

Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2014). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Kinash, S., & Wood, K. (2012). Workshop on “research questions” (personal communication).

Kreber, C. (2013). The transformative potential of the scholarship of teaching. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.5

Little, D., Green, D. A., & Hoption, C. (2018). A lasting impression: The influence of prior disciplines on educational developers’ research. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1458617

Macfarlane, K., Dennison, J., Delly, P., & Mitric, D. (2018). Sailing through a storm: The importance of dialogue in student partnerships. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3457

Martin, E., Benjamin, J., Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1999). Scholarship of teaching: A study of the approaches of academic staff. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving student learning outcomes (pp. 326-331). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University.

Matthews, K. E. (2018a). Simple publication pro forma: A heuristic framework to shape an empirical publication. Brisbane: University of Queensland. Retrieved from https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:68aebe0

Matthews, K. E. (2018b). Publication pro forma: A heuristic framework to support scholarly research into teaching and learning. Brisbane: University of Queensland. Retrieved from https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:2f9b305

Matthews, K. E., Marquis, E., & Healey, M. (2017). International collaborative writing groups as communities of practice. In J. McDonald & A. Cater-Steel (Eds.), Implementing communities of practice in higher education: Dreamers and schemers (pp. 597-617). Singapore: Springer.

Maurer, T. (2017). Guidelines for authorship credit, order, and co-inquirer learning in collaborative faculty-student SoTL projects. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.1.9

McDonald, F., Reynolds, J., Bixley, A., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2017). Changes in approaches to learning over three years of university undergraduate study. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.6

Miller-Young, J. E., Yeo, M., & Manarin, K. (2018). Challenges to disciplinary knowing and identity: Experiences of scholars in a SoTL development program. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2018.120103

Moore, J. L. (2018). Writing SoTL: Going public for an extended audience. In N. L. Chick (Ed.), SoTL in action: Illuminating critical moments of practice (pp. 119-126). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Murray, R. (2009). Writing for academic journals. (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Nevin, A. I., Thousand, J. S., & Villa, R. A. (2011). Working with coauthors. In T. S. Rocco, & T. E. Hatcher (Eds.), The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing (pp. 274-292). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Noble, K. (1989). Publish or perish: What 23 journal editors have to say. Studies in Higher Education, 14(1), 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078912331377642

O’Shea, S. (2018). Equity and students as partners: The importance of inclusive relationships. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3628

Poole, G. (2013). Square one: What is research? In K. McKinney (Ed.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines (pp. 135-¬151). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Rocco, T. S., & Hatcher, T. (Eds.) (2011). The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Rynes, S. L., Hillman, A., Ireland, R. D., Kirkman, B. L. Law, K. S., Miller, C. C., Rajagopalan, N., & Shapiro, D. (2005). Everything you’ve always wanted to know about AMJ (but may have been afraid to ask). Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 732-737. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.28563879

Sadler, R. (2006). Up the publication road: A guide to publishing in scholarly journals for academics, researchers and graduate students. (3rd ed.). Milperra, NSW: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.

Shulman, L. S. (1999). Taking learning seriously. Change, 31(4), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389909602695

Simmons, N., Abrahamson, E., Deshler, J. M., Kensington-Miller, B., Manarin, K., Morón-García, S., Oliver, C., & Renc-Roe, J. (2013). Conflicts and configurations in a liminal space: SoTL scholars’ identity development. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(2), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.9

Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sword, H. (2016). “Write every day!” A mantra dismantled. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(4), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2016.1210153

Teaching and Learning Inquiry [TLI] (n.d.) Focus and scope. Retrieved from https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/about#focus

Thomson, P. (2017). “Internationalising” a journal article. [Web log post] Retrieved from https://patthomson.net/2017/10/09/internationalising-a-journal-article/

Thomson, P., & Kamler, B. (2013). Writing for peer reviewed journals: Strategies for getting published. London: Routledge.

Published
2019-09-16
How to Cite
Healey, M., Matthews, K. E., & Cook-Sather, A. (2019). Writing Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Articles for Peer-Reviewed Journals. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 7(2), 28-50. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.3