Flipped vs. traditional: An analysis of teaching techniques in finance and psychology

Keywords: confounding variables, finance, flipped classroom, psychologyp, video lecture


Recently there has been a surge of interest in technology-aided teaching strategies such as the flipped classroom. Given the growing interest in these techniques, it is important to critically evaluate their effectiveness and to begin to examine factors that might shape how effective the flipped classroom will be in a given educational setting. Although most existing research on the flipped classroom suggests an advantage of the flipped approach over a more traditional lecture approach, most of this research has been conducted in a single educational setting at a time and in ways that preclude definitive conclusions about the relative effectiveness of the flipped approach. We present the results of a study that addressed many of these methodological limitations and compared the effectiveness of the flipped approach to a traditional lecture approach across two semesters in courses from two different disciplines, finance and psychology. We found that the effectiveness of the flipped versus the traditional approach varied across the two courses. In particular, in the psychology courses the flipped approach resulted in superior performance on quizzes administered immediately after exposure to course material, but resulted in similar performance on exams administered some time after initial exposure. In contrast, in the finance courses the flipped approach resulted in similar performance on immediately administered quizzes, but superior performance on later-administered exams. These results contribute to the burgeoning literature on the flipped classroom both by addressing methodological limitations found in previous work and by identifying some of the specific conditions under which the flipped approach may be a good pedagogical choice.

Author Biographies

Michael Robert Andreychik, Fairfield University

Michael Andreychik is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Fairfield University (USA). He is a social psychologist studying attitudes and emotions and works with colleagues at the intersection of research and pedagogy as a faculty liaison in Fairfield’s Center for Academic Excellence.

Valeria Martinez, Fairfield University

Valeria Martinez is an Associate Professor of Finance at Fairfield University (USA). Her research focuses on empirical finance and pedagogy; her goal in the classroom is for students to become inspired and learn.


Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of research. Paper presented at the 2013 Annual Conference & Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta, Georgia. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/22585

Day, J. A., & Foley, J. D. (2006). Evaluating a web lecture intervention in a human–computer interaction course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(4), 420–431. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4012664

Drouin, M. A. (2014). If you record it, some won’t come: Using lecture capture in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 41(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628313514172

Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 63-71. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2331035

Fisher, R., Ross, B., LaFerriere, R. & Maritz, A. (2017). Flipped, learning, flipped satisfaction, getting the balance right. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.9

Ford, M. B., Burns, C. E., Mitch, N., & Gomez, M. M. (2012). The effectiveness of classroom capture technology. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412452982

Harjoto, M. A. (2016). MBA students perceptions on pre-lecture videos for corporate finance core course. Journal of Financial Education, 42 (1/2), 81-101. http://www.jstor.org/stable/90000837

He, Y., Swenson, S., & Lents, N. (2012). Online video tutorials increase learning of difficult concepts in an undergraduate analytical chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(9), 1128–1132. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200685p

Kay, R., & Kletskin, I. (2012). Evaluating the use of problem-based video podcasts to teach mathematics in higher education. Computers & Education, 59(2), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.007

Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O. & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22 (July), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003.

Lloyd, S. A. & Robertson, C. L. (2012). Screencast tutorials enhance student learning of statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 39(1), 67-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311430640

Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O’Dowd, D.K. (2010). Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-04-0063

Ruddick, K. W. (2012). Improving chemical education from high school to college using a more hands-on approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.

Strayer, J. F. (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1189523914

Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., & Lee, H. (2009, June). “Flipping” the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education, Austin, Texas. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/4545

How to Cite
AndreychikM. R., & MartinezV. (2019). Flipped vs. traditional: An analysis of teaching techniques in finance and psychology. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 7(2), 154-167. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.10