Legitimating Reflective Writing in SoTL: “Dysfunctional Illusions of Rigor” Revisited

  • Alison Cook-Sather Bryn Mawr College
  • Sophia Abbot Elon University
  • Peter Felten Elon University
Keywords: reflection, reflective writing, rigor, SoTL, student-faculty partnerships

Abstract

In a classic 2010 article, Craig Nelson critiques his own previously held “dysfunctional illusions of rigor” that for years had constrained his teaching. He demonstrates that certain “rigorous” pedagogical practices disadvantage rather than support learners, and he argues for an expansion of what counts as legitimate pedagogical approaches. We evoke Nelson’s assertions to make a parallel argument regarding the traditional conventions of academic discourse. While formal scholarly writing may be well suited to capturing some of the outcomes of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), these genres can also be exclusive; inadequate to the task of conveying the complex, incomplete, and messy aspects of the work; and neither interesting nor accessible to those who are not required to produce or to read publications focused on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. We propose that reflective writing be legitimated as a form of writing for SoTL, and we use examples from a growing body of reflective writing about pedagogical partnership to illustrate our points. Echoing Nelson, we offer four reasons for this expansion of legitimacy: (1) the process of reflection is an essential component of learning; (2) reflective writing captures the complexity of learning; (3) reflection is an accessible form of writing for both new and experienced SoTL authors; and (4) reflective writing is accessible to a wide range of readers. We conclude by emphasizing the potential of including reflective writing among those modes of analysis valued in SoTL to expand what counts as rigor in the construction and representation of knowledge about teaching and learning.

Author Biographies

Alison Cook-Sather, Bryn Mawr College

Alison Cook-Sather is Mary Katharine Woodworth Professor of Education at Bryn Mawr College and Director of the Teaching and Learning Institute at Bryn Mawr and Haverford Colleges (USA). She has published widely on student voice and pedagogical partnership work and serves as founding editor of Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education and founding co-editor of International Journal for Students as Partners, both of which publish reflective essays.

Sophia Abbot, Elon University

Sophia Abbot is a graduate student in a Masters of Higher Education program and Graduate Apprentice in the Center for Engaged Learning at Elon University (USA). She is finalizing a co-edited collection (forthcoming, fall 2019) about pedagogical partnership written in a diverse range of genres, including many reflective pieces.

Peter Felten, Elon University

Peter Felten is Executive Director of the Center for Engaged Learning, Professor of History, and Assistant Provost for Teaching and Learning at Elon University (USA). In 2020, he and co-author Leo Lambert will publish a book on relationship-rich undergraduate education.

References

Arao, B., & Clemens, K. (2013). From safe spaces to brave spaces: A new way to frame dialogue around diversity and social justice. In L. M. Landreman (Ed.), The art of effective facilitation: Reflections from social justice educators (pp. 135-150). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2000). Teaching to promote intellectual and personal maturity: Incorporating students’ worldviews and identities into the learning process. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Bernstein, D. & Bass, R. (2005). The scholarship of teaching and learning. Academe, 91(4), 37-43.

Bostow, R., Brewer, S., Chick, N., Galina, B., McGrath, A., Mendoza, K, . . . Valle-Ruiz, L. (2015). Introduction to this guide. In Bostow et al., A guide to feminist pedagogy. Vanderbilt Center for Teaching. Retrieved from https://my.vanderbilt.edu/femped/

Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.) (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Routledge.

Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2016). Cultivating student-staff partnerships through research and practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2016.1124965

Bryson, C. (Ed.) (2014). Understanding and developing student engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.

Cates, R. M., Madigan, M. R., & Reitenauer, V. L. (2018). “Locations of possibility”: Critical perspectives on partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3341

CELatElon (2013, September 18). The big tent debate in SoTL. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM9dEwG_5eI

Cook-Sather, A. (2008). “What you get is looking in a mirror, only better”: Inviting students to reflect (on) college teaching. Reflective Practice, 9(4), 473–83.

Cook-Sather, A. (2016). Creating brave spaces within and through student-faculty pedagogical partnerships. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(18), http://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss18/1

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Dauphinee, E. (2010). The ethics of autoethnography. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 799-818. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000690

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. New York, NY: D. C. Heath

Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121

Felten, P. (2017). Emotion and partnerships. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3070

Gravett, E. O., & Bernhagen, L. (2018). Ways of doing: Feminist educational development. To Improve the Academy, 37(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/tia2.20068

Hamshire, C., Forsyth, R., Bell, A. Benton, M., Kelly-Laubscher, R., Paxton M., & Wolfgramm-Foliaki, E. (2017). The potential of student narratives to enhance quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 23(1), 50-64, https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2017.1294407

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3

Hutchings, P. (2002). Informal handout and remarks at the SoTL Community of Practice. Annual meeting of the American Association of Higher Education, Chicago, Illinois.

Hutchings, P., Huber, M. T., & Ciccone, T. (2011). The scholarship of teaching and learning reconsidered: Institutional integration and impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.

International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. (2017, December 13). Helen Sword “Writing to the heights and from the heart.” Plenary address at the meeting of the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Calgary, Alberta. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52WT2YlxpI0&feature=youtu.be

Lesnick, A. (2005). The mirror in motion: Redefining reflective practice in an undergraduate field work seminar. Reflective Practice, 6(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462394042000326798

Manarin, K. (2017). Reading the stories of teaching and learning—ISSOTL 2016 opening keynote. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.1.13

Matthews, K. E. (2016). Students as partners as the future of student engagement. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1), 1-5.

Mauer, T. (2017). Guidelines for authorship credit, order, and co-inquirer learning in collaborative faculty-student SoTL projects. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.1.9

McKinney, K. (2007). Enhancing learning through the scholarship of teaching and learning: The challenges and joys of juggling. Bolton, MA: Anker Press.

McKinney, K. (2011). What is the scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education? Retrieved from http://uca.edu/cte/files/2011/06/6whatdefinesotl.pdf

McKinney, K. (2012). Increasing the impact of SoTL: Two sometimes neglected opportunities. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1). Article 3. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060103

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, L. S., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., . . . Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal of Students as Partners, 1(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119

Nelson, C. (2010). Dysfunctional illusions of rigor: Lessons from the scholarship of teaching and learning. To Improve the Academy, 28 (1), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2010.tb00602.x

Ng, L., & Carney, M. (2017). Scholarly personal narrative in the SoTL tent. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.1.10

Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Sword, H. (2009). Writing higher education differently: A manifesto on style. Studies in Higher Education, 34(3), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597101

Werder, C., & Otis, M. (Eds.) (2010). Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Werder, C., Pope-Ruark, R., & Verwoord, R. (2016). Students as co-inquirers. (Special Section Guest Editors’ Introduction). Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2) 1-3. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2

Woolmer, C. 2018. “Exploring Dimensions of Risk in Pedagogical Partnerships in Higher Education.” Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(24). https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss24/1

Published
2019-09-16
How to Cite
Cook-Sather, A., Abbot, S., & Felten, P. (2019). Legitimating Reflective Writing in SoTL: “Dysfunctional Illusions of Rigor” Revisited. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 7(2), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.2