Enhancing the design and analysis of flipped learning strategies
There are numerous calls in the literature for research into the flipped learning approach to match the flood of popular media articles praising its impact on student learning and educational outcomes. This paper addresses those calls by proposing pedagogical strategies that promote active learning in ‘flipped’ approaches and improved practice of educational design in ICT supported learning environments. This paper makes two main contributions. It situates flipped learning strategies within a pedagogical framework, thus linking them to higher-level pedagogy. Additionally, it proposes an approach to both analysing and designing flipped learning strategies. This exploratory approach provides a guide for educators to map how their tactics fit amongst other instances of flipped learning. Examples of flipped learning approaches are provided to illustrate this mapping. The Flipped Learning Matrix, developed by this SoTL inquiry, is a tool for both critical reflection of existing approaches and course design, empowering the educator to design their own flipped version that is pedagogically sound and fit for purpose.
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale
and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14.
Berens, K. I. (2014, January 23). Double flip: 3 insights flipping the humanities seminar. Hybrid Pedagogy.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene, Or: International Society for Technology in Education.
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. (1982), Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.
Educause Learning Initiative. (2012). 7 Things You Should Know About Flipped Classrooms. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI).
Flipped Learning Network. (2015, November 23).
Flynn A. B. (2012), Development of an online, post-class question method and its integration with teaching strategies, Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 456-464.
Flynn, A. B. (2015). Structure and evaluation of flipped chemistry courses: Organic & spectroscopy, large and small, first to third year, English and French. Chemistry Education Research and Practice (1109-4028), 16(2), p. 198-211.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson A. T., & Archer W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 5-9.
Gerstein, J. (2012). The flipped classroom: The full picture. Amazon Digital Services, Incorporated.
Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), p.82-101.
Graham, C. R., Henri, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for blended learning research. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives, volume 12 (pp. 13-38). New York. NY: Routledge.
Healey, M. (2005) Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching, (pp. 67-78). Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: FT Press.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, (Winter 2000), 30-43.
Levy, P. (2015). Technology-supported design for inquiry-based learning. In M. Li & Y. Shao (Eds.), Exploring learning and teaching in higher education (pp. 289-304). Berlin: Springer.
Levy, P., Little, S., McKinney, P., Nibbs, A., & Wood, J. (2009). The Sheffield companion to inquiry-based learning. Sheffield, UK: CILASS.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mason, G., Shuman, T., & Cook, K. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430-435.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
Redekopp, M. W., & Ragusa, G. (2013). Evaluating flipped classroom strategies and tools for computer engineering. In Proceedings of the 120th American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA.
Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731.
Shea, P., Hayes, S., Smith, S. U., Vickers, J., Bidjerano T, Pickett. A., & Shoubang, J. (2012). Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 89-95.
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying k-12 blended learning. Mountain View, CA: Innosight Institute.
Westermann, E. B. (2014). A half-flipped classroom or an alternative approach? Primary sources and blended learning. Educational Research Quarterly, 38(2), 43-57.
Wood, J., Bell, E., Hill, K., Huntington, J., & Scorpo, A. L. (2014). Making digital history: Students as partners in online learning, teaching and research. Making Digital History, University of Lincoln.
Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., & Lee, H. (2009). “Flipping” the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. In Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition. Austin, TX.
Copyright (c) 2017 Martin Jenkins
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.