Student voice in work integrated learning scholarship: A review of teacher education and geographical sciences
Keywords:student voice, work integrated learning, problem based learning, teacher education, geographical sciences, students as researchers
Work integrated learning is an umbrella term that refers to the opportunities provided to university students to integrate knowledge of theory and practice as part of their degree program. As the role of students in higher education is evolving, we sought to develop our understanding of the role of students in the work integrated learning (WIL) space through exploring current literature on student voice. In this paper, we consider what has been reported about WIL in relation to student voice, how it has been represented, and how this has influenced practice. We undertook a systematic literature review for two different disciplines, one which represented an example of a professionally accredited undergraduate degree program (teacher education), and the other an example of a program with no professional accreditation (geographical sciences). The teacher education literature demonstrated more clearly the use of student voice to inform WIL within curriculum design. However, the geographical sciences literature did include examples of student voice being incorporated within the design of collaborative community-based forms of WIL. A role for students as researchers, who lead research and initiate curriculum change into WIL, was noticeably absent in both disciplinary sets of literature. The lack of evidence of the inclusion of students in the design, conduct, and analysis of WIL provides an invitation for SoTL scholars to redefine the role of students in this space.
Billett, S. (2009). Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 827-843.
Bradwell, J. (2009). The edgeless university: why higher education must enhance technology. London: Demos.
Conrad, P., Sketris, I., & Langille-Ingram, E. (2013). Participants’ perceptions of a multidisciplinary training program for graduate and postgraduate students in drug use management and policy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(5), 102.
Cook-Sather, A. (2006a). ‘Change based on what students say:’ Preparing teachers for a paradoxical model of leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(4), 345-358.
Cook-Sather, A. (2006b). Sound, presence and power: ‘Student voice’ in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359-390.
Cook-Sather, A. (2007). Translating researchers: Re-imagining the work of investigating students’ experiences in school. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 829-871). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Cook-Sather, A. (2014). The trajectory of student voice in educational research. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 49(2), 131-148.
Cooper, L., Orrell, J., & Bowden, M. (2010). Work integrated learning: A guide to effective practice. London: Routledge.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience in education. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Dunne, E., & Zandstra, R. (2011). Students as change agents—New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education.
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 121-125.
Fielding, M. (2004a). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295-311.
Fielding, M. (2004b). ‘New Wave’ student voice and the renewal of civic society. London Review of Education, 2(3), 197-217.
Fine, M., Torre, M. E., Burns, A., & Payne, Y. A. (2007). Youth research/participatory methods for reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 805-828). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Flint, A., & Oxley, A. (2009). Learning from internal change academy processes. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University, Learning and Teaching Institute.
Freeman, R. (2016). Is student voice necessarily empowering? Problematising student voice as a form of higher education governance. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(4), 859-962.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Givelber, D. J., Baker, B. K., McDevitt, J., & Miliano, R. (1995). Learning through work: An empirical study of legal internship. Journal of Legal Education, 45(1), 1-48.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.
Guile, D., & Griffiths, T. (2001). Learning through work experience. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 113-131.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
Holdsworth, R. (2000). Schools that create real roles of value for young people. UNESCO International Prospect, 3, 349-362.
Kay, J., Dunne, E., & Hutchinson, J. (2010). Rethinking the values of higher education—Students as change agents?
Kindon, S., & Elwood, S. (2009). Introduction: More than methods—Reflections on participatory action research in geography teaching, learning and research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(1), 19-32.
Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1020-1041.
Ku, H. B., Yuan-Tsang, A. W. K., & Liu, H. C. (2009). Triple capacity building as a critical pedagogy: A rural social work practicum in China. Journal of Transformative Education, 7(2), 146-163.
Levin, B. (1994). Educational reform and the treatment of students in schools. Journal of Educational Thought, 28(1), 88-101.
Lodge, C. (2005). From hearing voices to engaging dialogue: Problematising student participation in school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 125-146.
Matthews, K., Mercer-Mapstone, L., Marquis, B., McDonald, J., & Healey, M. (2015, 27-30 October). Learning and leading in international collaborative writing groups: Student, academic, facilitator & coordinator perspectives. Paper presented at the twelfth annual conference of the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL), Melbourne, Australia.
McKenna, L., Wray, N., & McCall, L. (2009). Exploring continuous clinical placement for undergraduate students. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(3), 327-335.
Mitra, D. (2007). Student voice in school reform: From listening to leadership. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 727-744). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
Monk, J. (2001). Teaching the «other»: Linking knowledge, emotion and action in geographical education. Treballs de Societat de Geografia, 52, 383-392.
Mulrow, C. D. (1994). Systematic reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 309, 597-599.
Neary, M. (2008). Student as producer: Risk, responsibility and rich learning environments in higher education. In J. Barlow, G. Louw, & M. Price (Eds.), Articles from the learning and teaching conference 2008 (pp. 6-13): University of Brighton Press.
NUS. (2012). A manifesto for partnership. London: National Union of Students.
Oldfather, P. (1995). Introduction to “learning from student voices.” Theory into Practice, 43, 84-87.
Orrell, J. (2011). Good practice report: Work-integrated learning.
Partridge, L., & Sandover, S. (2010). Beyond ‘listening’ to the student voice: The undergraduate researcher’s contribution to the enhancement of teaching and learning. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 7(2).
Patrick, P. J., Peach, D., Pocknee, C., Webb, F., Fletcher, M., & Pretto, G. (2008). The WIL [Work Integrated Learning] report: A national scoping study [Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) Final report].
QAA. (2014). Geography: Subject Benchmark Statement. Gloucester, UK: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
Raelin, J. A. (2007). Toward an epistemology of practice. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(4), 495-519.
Richardson, D., & Solis, P. (2004). Confronted by insurmountable opportunities: Geography in society at the AAG’s centennial. The Professional Geographer, 56(1), 4-11.
Roberts, C., Daly, M., Kumar, K., Perkins, D., Richards, D., & Garne, D. (2012). A longitudinal integrated placement and medical students’ intentions to practice rurally. Medical Education, 46(2), 179-191.
Rodger, S., Fitzgerald, C., Davila, W., Millar, F., & Allison, H. (2011). What makes a quality occupational therapy practice placement? Students’ and practice educators’ perspectives. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58, 195-202.
Rosaen, C., & Florio-Ruane, S. (2008). The metaphors by which we teach: Experience, metaphor, and culture in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Fieman-Marcus, J. McIntyre, & C. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts. New York: Routledge.
Sandover, S., Partridge, L., Dunne, E., & Burkill, S. (2012). Undergraduate researchers change learning and teaching: A case of two universities in Australia and the UK. CUR Quarterly, 33(1), 33-39.
Sattler, P. (2011). Work-integrated Learning in Ontario’s Postsecondary Sector. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
Thiessen, D. (2007). Researching student experiences in elementary and secondary school: An evolving field of study. In D. Thiessen, Cook-Sather, A. (Ed.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 1-76). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Watson, D., Hollister, R., Stroud, S., & Babcock, E. (2013). The engaged university: International perspectives on civic engagement. London: Routledge.