Looking in the mirror of inquiry: Knowledge in our students and in ourselves
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.2.1.7Keywords:
collaborative inquiry, second person inquiry, action research, experiential learning, transformative learningAbstract
At a large, urban community college located in the Northeastern United States, a group of faculty interested in helping students assume agency in their own learning used the methodology of Collaborative Inquiry (CI) as a way to examine the factors that help or hinder this process. Unexpected was the epistemological shift they underwent as a result of the CI process. The group had hoped to find ways to make students less passive, starting with the question “How do we make students into makers of knowledge?” The CI methodology, however, required the faculty to examine themselves and their own relationship with the process of knowledge-making. Through the inquiry process, which required participants to question their own assumptions, they realized that, even though they considered themselves makers of knowledge within their respective fields, they had approached this knowledge-making process quite passively. The group members thus found themselves involved in a Collaborative Inquiry process that they hadn’t initially fully understood but which required that they become active makers of knowledge. As a result, members rejected many of the assumptions implicit in the original question and began to approach the challenge of teaching and learning more actively, more respectfully, and with more humility. This article offers a narrative of this group’s process, the conclusions they reached, a set of reflections, and considerations that others using the CI process for professional development oriented inquiries may find useful.
References
Bray, J., Lee, J., Smith, L.L., & Yorks, L. (2000). Collaborative inquiry in practice: Action, reflection, and making meaning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Brookfield, S. D. (1980). The nature of independent adult learning. Continuing Education, 3.
Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2005). Doing action research in your own organization (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Coryell, J. E. (2013). Collaborative, comparative inquiry and transformative cross-cultural adult learning and teaching: A western education metanarrative and inspiring a global vision. Adult Education Quarterly. 63(4), 299-320.
Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social science for social change (2nd. ed.). London: Sage.
Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. London: Sage Publications.
Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2001) The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research “with” rather than “on” people. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 179 – 189). London: Sage.
Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2008). Extending epistemology within a co-operative inquiry. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.) (pp. 366-380). London: Sage.
Kasl., E., & Yorks, L. (2012). Learning to be what we know: The pivotal role of presentational knowing in transformative learning. In E. W. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.), Handbook of transformative education (pp. 503-519). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kovari, V., Hicks, R.T., Ferlazzo, L., McGarvey, G., Ochs, M., Alcántara, L., & Yorks, L. (2005). Don’t just do something, sit there: Helping others become more strategic, conceptual and creative: A cooperative inquiry. Retrieved from http://www.nyu.edu/wagner/leadership/reports/files/LeadersLearnersGuide.pdf.
Mankey, R. (2007). Understanding holistic leadership: A collaborative inquiry. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Teachers College, Columbia University, NY , NY .
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Reason, P. (1988). Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research. London: Sage.
Reason, P. (1992). Comments made during a meeting with doctoral students at Teachers College. Columbia University, New York.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (eds.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Torbert, W.R., & Taylor S.S. (2008). Action Inquiry: Interweaving multiple qualities of attention for timely action. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 239-252). London: Sage Publications.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. London: Harvard University Press.
Yorks, L., & Kasl, E. (2002). Toward a theory and practice for whole-person learning: Reconceptualizing experience and the role of affect. Adult Education Quarterly 52(3), 176-192.
Yorks, L., & Kasl, E. (2006). I know more than I can say: A taxonomy for using expressive ways of knowing to foster transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Learning. 4(1), 43-64.
