The power of social networks: A model for weaving the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning into institutional culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.49Keywords:
model for integrating SoTL, SoTL and institutional culture, social networks in higher education, change in higher educationAbstract
This paper offers a guide for those seeking to integrate the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) into higher education institutions to improve the quality of student learning. The authors posit that weaving SoTL into institutional cultures requires the coordinated actions of individuals working in linked social networks rather than individuals acting in isolation. Analyzing both the barriers and potential pathways to integrating SoTL into institutional cultures, the authors provide a conceptual model along with examples of practical strategies for overcoming resistance to change within institutions. The paper provides examples from a variety of different international contexts to show how incentives and other non-coercive measures can motivate faculty and administrators to weave SoTL into institutional fabrics.
Drawing on social network theory and the concept of communities of practice, the paper presents a model with attendant strategies for disseminating SoTL values and practices across all three levels of postsecondary institutions: the micro, the meso, and the macro. The authors argue that for SoTL to take root in organizational cultures, there must be 1) effective communication and dissemination of SoTL activity across all levels, 2) well established social networks and links between these levels (nodes), and 3) sustained support by senior administration. The authors conclude by suggesting ways their model could be tested.
Metrics
References
Asmar. C (2004). Innovations in scholarship at a student-centered research university: An Australian example. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 49-65. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/higher+education/journal/10755
Biagioli, M. (2002). From book censorship to academic peer review. Emergences: Journal for the Study of Media & Composite Cultures, 12(1), 11-45. doi: 10.1080/1045722022000003435
Billot, J., West, D., Khong, L., Skorobohacz, C., Roxå, T., Murray, S., & Gayle, B. (2013). Followership in higher education: Academic teachers and their formal leaders. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 2(1).
Christensen Hughes, J. M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006). Academic misconduct within higher education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(2), 1-21. Retrieved from http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/cjhe/article/view/183537
Craig, C. (2004). Higher education culture and organizational change in the 21st century. The Community College Enterprise: A Journal of Research & Practice, 10(1), 79-87. Retrieved from http://www.schoolcraft.edu/cce/
Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society. The report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (The Dearing Report). Retrieved from https://bei.leeds.ac.uk/Partners/NCIHE/
Edinburgh Napier University. (2012). Teaching Fellowship Scheme. Retrieved from http://staff.napier.ac.uk/services/academicdevelopment/TFscheme/Pages/welcome.aspx
Freeman, M., Clarkeburn, H., and Treleaven, L. (2007). A collaborative approach to improving academic honesty. In A. Brew and J. Sachs (Eds.) Transforming a university: The scholarship of teaching and learning in practice (pp.153-161). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
Gibbs, G., Knapper, C., & Piccinin, S. (2008). Disciplinary and contextually appropriate approaches to leadership of teaching in research-intensive academic departments in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62, 416–436. doi: 10.1111/j.14682273.2008.00402.x
Ginsberg, S.M., & Bernstein, J.L. (2011). Growing the scholarship of teaching and learning through institutional culture change. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 1-12. Retrieved from http://josotl.indiana.edu/article/view/1806/1803
Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little Brown.
Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380. doi:10.1086/225469 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
Haigh, N. Gossman, P. & Jiao, X. (2011). Undertaking an institutional ‘stock-take’ of SoTL: New Zealand University case studies. Higher Education Research & Development: Journal of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, 30, 9-23. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.536969
Healey, M., Bradford, M., Roberts, C. & Yolande, K. (2013). Collaborative discipline-based curriculum change: Applying Change Academy processes at department level, International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 31-44.
Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment, Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 49(1/2), 155-176. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/higher+education/journal/10734
Kennedy, J. (1998). Thinking is social: Experiments with the adaptive culture model. The Journal of Conflict Resolution: Journal of the Peace Science Society (International), 42(1), 56-76. doi:10.1177/0022002798042001003
Kezar, A., & Eckel, P.D. (2002). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 435-460. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0038
Kezar, A., Gallant, T.B., & Lester, J. (2011). Everyday people making a difference on college campuses: The tempered grassroots leadership tactics of faculty and staff. Studies in Higher Education, 36(2), 129-151. doi:10.1080/03075070903532304
Major, C.H. & Palmer, B. (2006). Reshaping teaching and learning: The transformation of faculty pedagogical content knowledge. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 51, 619-647. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-1391-2
Martensson, K., Roxå, T., & Olsson, T. (2011). Developing a quality culture through the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development: Journal of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, 30(1), 51-62. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.536972
McCabe, D. (2004). Ten (updated) principles of academic integrity: How faculty can foster student honesty. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 36(3). 10-15. doi:10.1080/00091380409605574
McCabe, D., & Trevino, L. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multi-campus investigation. Research in Higher Education: Journal of the Association for Institutional Research, 38, 379-396. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A%3A1024954224675
Mooney, C. (2011, May/June) The science of why we don’t believe science. Retrieved from http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/03/denial-science-chris-mooney
Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2011). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science: Research, Theory, & Application in Psychology and Related Sciences, 23(1) 13-17. doi:10.1177/0956797611421018
Peterson, M. & Spencer, M. (1991). Understanding academic culture and climate. In M. Peterson (Ed.), ASHE reader on organization and governance (pp. 140-155). Needham Heights, MA: Simon and Schuster.
Poole, G., & Simmons, N. (in press). Contributions of the scholarship of teaching and learning to quality enhancement in Canada. In R. Land & G. Gordon (Eds.) Enhancing quality in higher education: International perspectives. London: Routledge.
Ramsden, P. (1992.) Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Roxå, T. & Martensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks—exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 547-559. doi:10.1080/03075070802597200
Roxå, T., & Martensson, K. (in press). How leaders can influence higher education cultures. Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.ulster.ac.uk/centrehep/journal.html
Roy, D. Borin, P. & Kustra, E. (2007). Assisting curriculum change through departmental initiatives. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 112, 21-32. doi: 10.1002/tl.295
Schein, E.H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist: Journal of the American Psychological Association, 45(2), 109-119. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.109
Simkins, S. (2012, October). Addressing faculty resistance to change: Broadening and extending SoTL’s impact on teaching and learning. Paper presented at the Conference for the International Society for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Strickland K., McLatchie J., & Pelik, R. (2011) Reflections on the development of a dynamic learning, teaching and assessment strategy. Campus Wide Information Systems: The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 28, 294-298. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650741111162761
Tagg, J. (2012). Why does the faculty resist change? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. Retrieved from http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2012/JanuaryFebruary%202012/facultychange-full.html.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
