The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an age of accountability: Building bridges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.35Keywords:
higher education, scholarship of teaching and learning, accountability, quality improvementAbstract
In recent years, as pressures for accountability have increased in higher education, some members of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) community may worry that the inquiry-based, improvement-focused practices they advocate could be put at risk by easy-to-administer, one-size-fits-all forms of assessment, quality assurance, and administrative control. But while acknowledging both real and perceived tensions between these two movements, we also examine some of the ways and settings in which they are converging, featuring a number of international examples in which external quality and assessment mandates have been employed to support SoTL-like work. We look, too, at the roles that scholars of teaching and learning can play as mediators and brokers between the two movements, helping to translate accountability requirements into opportunities for improvement. In short we argue that these two movements present opportunities for each other. SoTL can contribute to what is, or should be, the central goal of accountability: ensuring and improving the quality of student learning. The accountability movement, for its part, can provide a new context for integrating and valuing SoTL as a force for positive change on campuses and beyond. Taken together, the two approaches can make meaningful contributions to higher learning today. The paper concludes with recommendations to the SoTL community for building bridges between the two movements.
References
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. (n.d.a). About the office for learning and teaching. Retrieved April 9, 2013 from http://www.olt.gov.au/about-olt.
Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. (n.d.b). The discipline scholars. Retrieved April 9, 2013 from http://www.olt.gov.au/june2010-discpline-scholars.
Baird, J. (2011). Accountability in Australia. In B. Stensaker, & L. Harvey, (Eds.), Accountability in higher education: Global perspectives on trust and power. New York: Routledge.
Baker, G. R. (2012). North Carolina A&T State University: A culture of inquiry. (NILOA Examples of Good Assessment Practice). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Banta, T.W. (2010). Impact of addressing accountability demands in the United States. Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), 181-183.
Banta, T.W., & Blaich, C. (2011). Closing the assessment loop. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(1), 22-27.
Bass, R. (1999). The scholarship of teaching and learning: What’s the problem? Inventio: Creative Thinking About Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1-10.
Blaich, C. F., & Wise, K. S. (2011). From gathering to using assessment results: Lessons from the Wabash National Study (NILOA Occasional Paper No.8). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Bok, D. C. (2008). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, N. J.: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (1996). Education, globalization and economic development. Journal of Education Policy, 11(1), 1-25.
Carey, M., Gale, R., Manarin, K., & Rathburn, M. (2010, November). Critically reading the word and the world. Presentation at the Centennial Symposium on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Banff, AB, Canada, Nov. 2010.
Ciccone, A., Huber, M. T., Hutchings, P., & Cambridge, B. (2009). Exploring impact: A survey of participants in the CASTL institutional leadership and affiliates program. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Clark, T. (2009). Impact of reforms on the quality and responsiveness of universities in the United Kingdom. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(2), 107-122.
Cox, R., Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2005). Survey of CASTL scholars. In M. T. Huber and P. Hutchings, The advancement of learning: Building the teaching commons (133-149). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cross, K. P. (1971). Beyond the open door: New students in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dewar, J. M. (2008). An apology for the scholarship of teaching and learning. InSight: A Journal for Scholarly Teaching, 3,17-22.
Fain, P. (2012). Performing under pressure. Inside Higher Education, October 22, 2012. Retrieved January 7, 2013 from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/10/22/bettermeasures-college-performance.
Ferrett, T. A., Geelan, D., Schlegel, W. M., & Stewart, J. L. (Eds.). (2013). Connected science: Strategies for integrative learning in college. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Foot, D. K., & Stoffman, D. (1998). Boom, bust & echo 2000: Profiting from the demographic shift in the new millennium (Rev. ed.). Toronto: Macfarlane Walter & Ross.
Healey, M. (2012). Students as change agents. Retrieved January 7, 2013 from http://www.mickhealey.co.uk/resources.
Hersh, R. H., & Merrow, J. (2005). Declining by degrees: Higher education at risk. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hubball, H., & Gold, N. (2007). The scholarship of curriculum practice and undergraduate program reform: Integrating theory into practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2007(112), 5-14.
Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2005). The advancement of learning: Building the teaching commons. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hutchings, P., Huber, M. T., & Ciccone, A. (2011). The scholarship of teaching and learning reconsidered: Institutional integration and impact. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2012). Standards. Retrieved December 31, 2012 from http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards.htm.
Jacobi, M., Astin, A.W., & Ayala, F. (1987). College student outcomes assessment: A talent development perspective (J-B ASHE Higher Education Report Series (AEHE)) (1sted.).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jankowski, N. A., Ikenberry, S. O., Kinzie, J., Kuh, G. D., Shenoy, G. F., & Baker, G. R. (2012). Transparency & accountability: An evaluation of the VSA college portrait pilot. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Kift, S., & Israel, M. (2011). Learning and teaching academic standards resources for law. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Lines, D. (2010). Enhancement themes: Things that make a difference: Lessons from the enhancement themes. Manchester: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Retrieved April 9, 2013 from http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk.
Marchese, T. (1991). TQM reaches the academy. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 44(3), 3-9.
National Commission on the Future of Higher Education. (2006). A Test of leadership: Charting the future of US higher education. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
Newton, J. (2000). Feeding the beast or improving quality? Academics’ perceptions of quality assurance and quality monitoring. Quality in Higher Education, 6(2), 152-163.
Organization for Economic Co-operationand Development (OECD). [n.d.]. Higher education and adult learning: Testing student and university performance globally. Retrieved December 11, 2012 from http://www.oecd.org/education/highereducationandadultlearning/testingstudentanduniversityperformancegloballyoecdsahelo.htm.
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2012). Education at a glance 2012: OEDC indicators, OECD publishing. Retrieved January 7, 2012 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2012-en.
Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities. (n.d.). Ontario qualifications framework (OQF). Retrieved April 9, 2013 from http://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/pepg/programs/oqf.
Partridge, H., Ponting, D., & McCay, M. (2011). Good practice report: Blended learning. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Poole, G. & Simmons, N. (2013). Contributions of the scholarship of teaching and learning to quality enhancement in Canada. In R. Land & G. Gordon (Eds.), Enhancing quality in higher education: International perspectives. London: Routledge.
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (n.d.). Welcome to the enhancement themes website. Retrieved April 9, 2013 from www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/.
Renc-Roe, J. (2012, October). SOTL travels: Furthering the potential of the scholarship of teaching and learning. Presentation at the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Scharff, L. (2013). Getting at the big picture through SoTL. In K. McKinney (Ed.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Sommers, J. (2004). Two-year college English faculty and the scholarship of teaching and learning: The journey awaits. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 32, 14-25.
Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2011). Accountability in higher education: Global perspectives on trust and power. New York: Routledge.
Trow, M. (1973). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Berkeley, CA: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education Reprint.
Voluntary System of Accountability. (2012). Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA) administration and reporting guidelines: AAC&U VALUE rubrics – demonstration project. Retrieved January 7, 2013 from www.voluntarysystem.org/news
Weingarten, H. P. (2012, October). Integrating the scholarship of teaching and learning into the academy. Presentation at the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Werder, C., & Otis, M. M. (Eds.). (2010). Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Virginia: Stylus.
