Assessment might dictate the curriculum, but what dictates assessment?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.107Keywords:
assessment, decision-making, design, research, evidenceAbstract
Almost all tertiary educators make assessment choices, for example, when they create an assessment task, design a rubric, or write multiple-choice items. Educators potentially have access to a variety of evidence and materials regarding good assessment practice but may not choose to consult them or be successful in translating these into practice. In this article, we propose a new challenge for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: the need to study the disjunction between proposals for assessment “best practice” and assessment in practice by examining the assessment decision-making of teachers. We suggest that assessment decision-making involves almost all university teachers, occurs at multiple levels, and is influenced by expertise, trust, culture, and policy. Assessment may dictate the curriculum from the student’s perspective, and we argue that assessment decision-making dictates assessment.
Metrics
References
Bennett, S., Thomas, L., Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L., Jones, J., & Harper, B. (2011). Understanding the design context for Australian university teachers: Implications for the future of learning design. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(2), 151-167. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2011.553622
Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary. In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for Learning in Higher Education (pp. 35-48). London: Kogan Page.
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151-167. doi: 10.1080/713695728
Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 14-28). London: Routledge.
Carless, D. (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79-89. doi: 10.1080/02602930801895786
Eley, M. (2006). Teachers’ conceptions of teaching, and the making of specific decisions in planning to teach. Higher Education, 51(2), 191-214. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6382-9
Joughin, G. (2009). Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education: A critical review. In G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education (pp. 13-27): Springer Netherlands.
Kreber, C. (2002). Teaching excellence, teaching expertise, and the scholarship of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 27(1), 5-23. doi: 10.1023/a:1020464222360
Marsh, E., Roediger, H., Bjork, R., & Bjork, E. (2007). The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 194-199. doi: 10.3758/bf03194051
Offerdahl, E. G., & Tomanek, D. (2011). Changes in instructors’ assessment thinking related to experimentation with new strategies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(7), 781-795. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.488794
Price, M., Carroll, J., O’Donovan, B., & Rust, C. (2011). If I was going there I wouldn’t start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 479-492. doi: 10.1080/02602930903512883
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Straus, S.E., Tetroe, J., & Graham, I. (2009) Defining knowledge translation. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 181(3-4), 165-168.
