The transformative potential of the scholarship of teaching

Authors

  • Carolin Kreber University of Edinburgh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.5

Keywords:

SoTL, social justice, transformative potential, profesionalism

Abstract

In discussing personal stances professionals might take towards their practice, Hoyle contrasts two orientations that can be placed at the ends of a continuum. The first pole, the so-called ‘restricted’ stance, is characterised by teachers relying principally on experience and intuition, and focusing on daily classroom practicalities. The second pole, the so-called ‘extended’ stance, is characterised by teachers valuing the theory underpinning practice, taking a more intellectual and rationally-based approach and holding a broader vision of education. I argue in this article that the scholarship of teaching and learning, when enacted in its ‘extended’ form, would be distinguished by two important features: a wider sense of what counts as relevant theory and a broader vision of what university teaching, and the education it is there to support, is for. The argument is built around three additional claims: (1) engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning authentically means to be motivated by a commitment to serve the important interests of students; (2) what is in the important interests of students is their own development towards greater authenticity; (3) promoting students’ authenticity has implications not just for students’ academic learning and personal flourishing but also for creating greater social justice in the world. These claims are substantiated by reference to theories of “authenticity” and learning as well as the capabilities approach to human development.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Carolin Kreber, University of Edinburgh

Carolin Kreber is Professor of Higher Education and Director of the Higher Education Research Group at the University of Edinburgh.

References

Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Barnett, R. (2005). Recapturing the universal in the university. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(6), 785-796.

Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(3), 247-260.

Barnett, R. (1990). The idea of higher education. Buckingham,UK: The Society of Research into Higher Education & open University Press.

Barrie, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 439-458.

Baxter-Magolda, M. (2009). Educating students for self-authorship: Learning partnerships to achieve complex outcomes. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines (pp. 143-156). New York and London: Routledge.

Baxter-Magolda, M. (1999). Creating contexts for learning and self-authorship: Constructivedevelopmental pedagogy. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

Bonnett, M., & Cuypers, S. (2003). Autonomy and authenticity in education. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith and P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education (pp. 326-340). Blackwell Philosophy Guides. Oxford, UL: Blackwell Publishing.

Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Brookfield, S. (1990). The skilful teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Brookfield, S. (2005). The power of critical theory. Liberating adult learning and teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Buber, M. (1958). I and thou (2nd ed.; R. G. Smith, Trans.). Edinburgh, UK: T. & T. Clark.

Collini, S. (2012). What are universities for? London and New York: Penguin Book.

Cortese, A. (2003). The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 15–22

Cranton, P.A. (2011). A transformative perspective on the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(1), 75-86.

Cross, K. P., & Steadman, M. H. (1996). Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Eagleton, T. (2007). The meaning of life. A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Elton, L. (2000). Turning academics into teachers: A discourse on love. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2), 257-260.

Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Entwistle, N. (1988). Styles of learning and teaching. An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.

Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (2009). The disposition to understand for oneself at university and beyond: Learning processes, the will to learn and sensitivity to context. In L-F. Zang & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles (pp. 29-62). New York: Springer.

Evans, L. (2002). Reflective practice in educational research: Developing advanced skills. London: Continuum.

Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20-38.

Fanghanel, J. (2011). Being an academic. New York: Routledge.

Freire, P. (1971). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (2009). Higher education and social justice. Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

Gale, R. (2009). Asking questions that matter…Asking questions of value. International Journal for the Scholarship of teaching and learning, 3(2). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v3n2/invited_essays/_Gale/index.htm Accessed on 18 August 2012

Grimmet, P., & Neufeld, J. (Ed.) (1994). Teacher development and the struggle for authenticity. Professional growth and restructuring in the context of change. Teacher College, Columbia University, NY : Teachers College Press.

Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.

Healey, M. (2000) Developing the scholarship of teaching and learning through the disciplines. Higher Education Research and Development, 19, 169-189.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time (trans. By John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. London: SCM Press. (Original work published in 1927) Henkel, M. (2005). Academic Identity and Autonomy in a Changing Policy Environment, Higher Education, 49(1), 155-76.

Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T.C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59-71.

hooks, b. (2003). Teaching community. A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge.

Hounsell, D. (2011). Graduates for the 21st Century: Integrating the Enhancement Themes. Synthesis of work of the theme 2010-2011. QAA paper graduate attributes http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/docs/resources/synthesis-of-work-of-the-theme-2010-2011-end-of-year-report-dai-hounsell.pdf Accessed 18 August 2012

Hoyle, E. (1975). Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching. In V. Houghton et al., (Eds.), Management in Education: The management of organisations and individuals (pp. 314-320). London: Ward Lock Educational in association with Open University Press.

Huber , M., & Hutchings, P. (2008). Placing theory in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7, 229-244.

Huber, M., & Morreale, S.P. (2002). Situating the scholarship of teaching and learning: A crossdisciplinary conversation. In M. Huber and S.P. Morreale (eds), Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground (pp. 1-24). Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and The American Association for Higher Education.

Hutchings, P. (2007). Theory: The elephant in the scholarship of teaching and learning room. International Journal for the Scholarship of teaching and learning, 1(1). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/2007_v1n1.htm Accessed on 18 August 2012.

Hutchings, P., Huber, M.Y., & Ciccone, A. (2011). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning reconsidered: Institutional integration and impact. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kreber, C. (2013). Authenticity in and through teaching in higher education: The transformative potential of the scholarship of teaching and learning. London and New York: Routledge.

Kreber, C. (2010). Academics’ teacher identities, authenticity and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 35(2), 171-194.

Kreber, C. (2009). Supporting student learning in the context of diversity, complexity and uncertainty. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The University and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 3-19). London, New York: Routledge.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Leibowitz, B. (2010). Towards SOTL as critical engagement: A perspective from the “South”. International Journal for the Scholarship of teaching and learning, 4(2). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v4n2/invited_essays/PDFs/_Leibowitz.pdf Accessed on 18 August 2012

McLean, M. (2006). Pedagogy and the university: Critical theory and practice. London & New York: Continuum Studies in Education.

Meyer, J.H.F., & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts: An introduction. In J.H.F. Meyer, and R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp.3-18). London: Routledge Falmer.

Neumann, F., King, M., & Carmichael, D.L. (2007). Authentic instruction and assessment. Common standards for rigor and relevance in teaching academic subjects. http://www.smallschoolsproject.org/PDFS/meetings/auth_instr_assess.pdf Accessed on 17 August 2012

Neumann, F.M., Marks, H.M., & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104, 280-312.

Nicholls, G. (2005). The challenge to scholarship. Rethinking learning, teaching and research.New York: Routledge.

Nixon, J. (2011). Higher Education and the Public Good: Imagining the University. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Nixon, J. (2008). Towards the virtuous university. The moral bases of academic practice. New York, NY : Routledge.

Nussbaum, M. (2011). Developing capabilities. Cambridge, New York: The Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, M. (2004). Upheavals of thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development. The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.

Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (Eds.). (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Palmer, P. (1998). The courage to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Perkins , D. (2005). Theories of difficulty. Presentation at the British Journal of Educational Psychology Conference, The University of Edinburgh, 20 May, 2005.

Roxa, T., Olsson, T., & Martensson, K. (2008). Appropriate use of theory in the scholarship of teaching and learning as a strategy for institutional development. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7, 276-294

Shulman, L., Signature pedagogies of the professions. Dædalus, Summer 2005, pp. 52-59.

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.

Splitter, L.J. (2009). Authenticity and constructivism in education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(2), 135-151.

Svinicki M. (2005). Authentic assessment: testing in reality. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 100, 23-29.

Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.

Trigwell, K. , Martin, E. , Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching and learning: A model . Higher Education Research and Development 19(2), 155-68.

Walker, M., & McLean, M. (2013). Professional education, capabilities and contributions to the public good: The role of universities in promoting human development. London and New York: Routledge.

Walker, M (2010). A human development and capabilities ‘prospective analysis’ of global higher education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 485-501.

Walker, M. (2009). ‘Making a world that is worth living in’: Humanities teaching and the formation of practical reasoning. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 8(3), 231-246.

Walker. M. (2006). Higher education pedagogies. A capabilities approach. Maidenhead, Berkshire: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Weimer, M. (1997). Assumptions that devalue university teaching. International Journal ofAcademic Development, 2(1), 52-59.

Downloads

Published

2013-03-01

How to Cite

Kreber, Carolin. 2013. “The Transformative Potential of the Scholarship of Teaching”. Teaching &Amp; Learning Inquiry 1 (1):5-18. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.5.