Indigenist and Decolonizing Memory Work Research Method

Authors

  • Gail Baikie

Keywords:

Indigenist; decolonizing; critical reflection; Inuit

Abstract

Indigenous researchers innovate and forge their own methodological paths within the realm of academic research. I developed an Indigenist and Decolonizing Memory Work method when I was unable to find a pre-existing approach for investigating phenomenon in-between Indigenous and Euro-western worldviews. This method is informed by the Euro-western methods of autoethnography, memory work, and collective biography. Furthermore, the Indigenous story work method along with other Indigenous research principles and practices are central features. In particular, I recognize and acknowledge that any Indigenous research project is situated from and within an Indigenist standpoint, in this case my own Labrador Inuit worldview.  However, there is consistency with other Indigenous principles and together these influence the research process. It also was imperative that the methodology account for the colonizing features of both academic research and the fact that Indigenous research participants have been influenced in varying degrees by dominant Euro-western discourses.  To account for this reality, a central feature of this method is the Decolonizing Critical Reflection (DCR) approach that replaces the typical interview and is intended to elicit decolonized data, or memories that research participants analyze themselves using Indigenizing and decolonizing theory and perspectives. The DCR approach is explained and described.

References

Absolon, K.E. (2011). Kaandossiwin: How we come to know. Winnipeg, MB: Fernwood.

Absolon, K.E. (2010). Indigenous wholistic theory: A knowledge set for practice. First Peoples Child and Family Review, 5(2), 74-87.

Archibald, J. (2008). Indigenous storywork. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.

Arnakak, J. (2002). Incorporation of Inuit Qaujimanituqangit, or Inuit Traditional Knowledge, into the Government of Nunavut. The Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development, 3(1), 33-39.

Ayala, J. (2009). Split scenes, converging visions: The ethical terrains where PAR and borderlands scholarship meet. Urban Review, 41, 66-84.

Battiste, M. (2000). Maintaining Aboriginal identity, language and culture in modern society. In. M. Battiste (Ed.). Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision (pp.192-208). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.

Bartlett, C., Marshall, M., Marshall, A., & Iwama, M. (2012). Integrative science and two-eyed seeing: Enriching the discussion framework for healthy communities. Beyond intractability: convergence and opportunity at the interface of environmental, health and social issues. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press. Retrieved from: http:// www. integrativescience. ca/ uploads/ articles.

Butz, D. & Besio, K. (2004). The value of autoethnography for field research in transcultural settings. The Professional Geographer, 56(3), 350-360.

Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light Publishers.

Clandinin, D.J. & Connelly, F.M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Corntassel, J., Chaw-win-is, & T’lakwadzi. (2009). Indigenous storytelling, truth-telling, and community approaches to reconciliation. English Studies in Canada, 35(1), 137-159.

Crawford, J., Kippax, S., Onyx, J., Gault, U. & Benton, P. (1992). Emotion and gender: Constructing meaning and memory. London, UK: Sage Publications.

Cruikshank, J. (1998). The social life of stories: Narrative and knowledge in the Yukon territory. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Davis, B. & Gannon, S. (Eds.). (2006). Doing collective biography. New York, NY: Open University Press.

Duran, E. (2006). Healing the soul wound. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Fook, J. (2002). Social Work: Critical theory and practice. London, UK: Sage Publications.

Fook, J. & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection: A resource handbook. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

Geniusz, W.M. (2009). Our knowledge is not primitive. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

Gross, L. W. (2003). Cultural sovereignty and Native American hermeneutics in the interpretation of the sacred stories of the Anishinaabe. Wicazo Sa Review, 18(3), 127-134.

Hart, M.A. (2002). Seeking mino-pimatisiwin: An Aboriginal approach to helping. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.

Haug, F. & Others. (1987). Female sexualization: A collective work of memory. London, UK: Verso.

Inuit Circumpolar Council. (2014) Inuit: United voice of the Arctic. Retrieved from: http://www.inuitcircumpolar.com

Iwama, M., Marshall, M., Marshall, A., & Bartlett, C. (2009). Two-eyed seeing and the language of healing in community-based research. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 32(2), 3-23.

Jackson, M.G. (2008). Transformative learning for a new world view. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

Kaufman, S.J., Ewing, M.S., Hyle, A. E., Montgomery, D., & Self, P. A. (2003). Women and nature: Using memory work to rethink our relationship to the natural world. Environmental Education Research, 7(4), 359-377.

Kemppainen, J.K. (2000). The critical incident technique and nursing care quality research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(5), 1264-1271.

Kuokkanen, R. (2007). Reshaping the university: Responsibility, Indigenous epistemes, and the logic of the gift. Toronto, ON: UBC Press.

Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257-278.

Stephenson, N., & Papadopoulos, D. (2006). Analysing everyday experience: Social research and political change. Basingstoke, UK & New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Loppie, S., Reading, C. & de Leeuw, S. (2014). Aboriginal experiences with racism and its impacts. National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health. Retrieved from www.ccnsa-nccah.ca/publications/lists/publications/attachments/131/2014_07_09_fs_2426_racismpart2_experiencesimpacts_en_web.pdf

Martin, K. (2003). Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and indigenist re‐search. Voicing Dissent, New Talents 21C: Next Generation Australian Studies Journal of Australian Studies, 27(76), 203-214

McGrath, J.T. (2011). Isumaksaqsiurutigijakka: Conversations with Aupilaarjuk towards a theory of Inuktitut knowledge renewal (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Carleton University, Ottawa, ON. Retrieved from: https://curve.carleton.ca/4c28533b-efed-4916-8a04-0dceb591265c

McGregor, H. E. (2012). Curriculum change in Nunavut: Towards Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit. McGill Journal of Education, 47(3), 285-302.

McKee, M. (2003). Excavating our frames of mind: The key to dialogue and collaboration. Social Work, 48(3), 401-408.

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5-12.

Montalvo, F.F. (1999). The critical incident interview and ethnoracial identity. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 7(3/4), 19-42.

Newhouse, D. (2008). Ganigonhi:oh: The Good Mind meets the academy. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 31(1), 184-197.

Pauktuutit. (2006). The Inuit way: A guide to Inuit culture. Ottawa, ON: Pauktuutit.

Phillips, D.K. & Carr, K. (2006). Becoming a teacher through action research: Process, context, and self-study. New York, NY: Routledge.

Pratt, M.L. (2008). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Scott, J. (1992). Experience. In J. Butler & J.W. Scott (Eds.). Feminists theorize the political (pp. 22-40). New York, NY: Routledge.

Tagalik, S. (2009-2010). Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit: The role of Indigenous knowledge in supporting wellness in Inuit communities in Nunavut. National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health. Prince George B.C.: University of Northern British Columbia. Retrieved from: https://www.ccnsa nccah.ca/docs/health/FS-InuitQaujimajatuqangitWellnessNunavut-Tagalik-EN.pdf

Vessey, D. (2009). Gadamer and the fusion of horizons. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 17(4), 525-536.

Watts, M. & Lawson, M. (2009). Using a meta-analysis activity to make critical reflection explicit in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 609-616.

Weaver, H.N. (2001). Indigenous People and the social work profession: Defining culturally competent services. In J.M. Schriver (Ed.), Human Behaviour and the Social Environment: Shifting paradigms in essential knowledge for social work practice, 3rd Ed, (pp. 158-167). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Whiak, C. (2004). Psychologists in Nunavut: A comparison of the principles underlying Inuit Qaujimanituqangit and the Canadian Psychological Association Code of Ethics. Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 2(1), 29-40.

Whitinui, P. (2014). Indigenous autoethnography: Exploring, engaging, and experiencing “self” as a Native method of inquiry. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(4), 456- 487.

Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing.

Wood, P.J. and Schwass, M. (1993). Cultural safety: A framework for changing attitudes. Nursing Praxis, 8(1), 4-15.

Yip, K. (2006). Self-reflection in reflective practice: A note of caution. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 777-788.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-20