Ndehl Heehl G̱oodin? (Translation from Gitxsan: “How are you feeling? What is your heart telling you?”) Centring Gitxsan Worldviews in Midterm Course Experience Surveys
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55016/hedy8k09Keywords:
Storywork, Quantitative Data, Language Revitalization, Gitxsan Worldview, Indigenous Pedagogy, Decolonial Education, Midterm EvaluationAbstract
Background: Ndehl Heehl G̱oodin? (“How are you feeling? What is your heart telling you?”), funded by an internal teaching and research grant within the faculty of Human and Social Development at the University of Victoria, explores how Gitxsan worldviews can inform midterm course evaluations. Conventional evaluations rely on standardized metrics, with little consideration for how Indigenous pedagogies and relationality shape reflective learning. This study examined how Gitxsan ways of being can inform and affirm culturally grounded approaches to course feedback surveys.
Methods: Two former students of an asynchronous social work course and four Gitxsan community members participated in 30-60-minute interviews. Student interviews were recorded and transcribed, while community interviews followed Storywork with interviewer journaling. Purposeful sampling supported trust and relational connection. Data were thematically analyzed, and a Gitxsan Elder and fluent speaker translated thematic headings into Gitxanimx.
Results: Seven themes emerged: Nada k’i’yhl t’il ts’iipxwit (Engagement/Connection), Hosim ho sag̱ayt k’i’yhl g̱ag̱oodiit (Relationality), Sityeekwsit (Transformation), Wila sawitxwt (Identity), Luu hoksxwit (Belonging), Lax̱ yip (Land), Aluut’aa siwilaaksa (Teachings), and Heeḵ’al (Responsibility). Participants emphasized relational and land-based approaches that deepen reflection, strengthen community connection, and counter harms linked to quantitative systems.
Conclusions: Integrating Gitxsan ways of being into assessment can enhance reflective learning while honouring Indigenous worldviews. This pilot project offers groundwork for culturally grounded feedback tools in education.
References
Absolon, K. (2011). Kaandossiwin: How we come to know. Fernwood Publishing.
Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.
Archibald, J. (2008). Indigenous Storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. UBC Press.
Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Clear Light Publishers.
David-Chavez, D., & Layden, T. (2022). Understanding roles and positionality in Indigenous science & education. Indigenous Land and Data Stewards Lab. https://www.indigenouslandstewards.org/resource-hub-blogs/understanding-roles-and-positionality-in-indigenous-science-and-education
Currie, S., & Kind, S. (2008). First Nations pedagogy for online learning. BCcampus. https://firstnationspedagogy.com/FN_Pedagogy.html
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.
Heffernan, T., & Harpur, P. (2023). Discrimination against academics and career implications of student evaluations: university policy versus legal compliance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(8), 1283–1294. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/10.1080/02602938.2023.2225806
Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
Justice Canada. (2020). Indigenous approaches to evaluation and research. Government of Canada. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/eiaer-eaame/docs/rsd_rr2020-indigenous-approaches-to-evaluation-and-research-eng.pdf
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press.
Nwe Jinan. (2023, April 20). N’we Jinan artists – “Here we come” // Hazelton Secondary School, BC [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rli375oP9c8
Reconciliation Education. (2025). 4 Seasons of Reconciliation. Reconciliation Education. https://www.reconciliationeducation.ca/4-seasons-of-reconciliation-professional-development-course
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
Smith, M. J. (2004). Placing Gitxsan stories in text: Returning the feathers, Guuxs Mak’am mik’aax [Master’s thesis, University of British Columbia]. UBC Open Collections. https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0054675
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Truth and reconciliation commission of Canada: Calls to action. http://trc.ca/assets/pdf/Calls_to_Action_English2.pdf
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/18630/15554
University of Northern British Columbia. (2025). Koh-Learning in our watersheds: Transforming education connecting students, communities, and waterways. UNBC Integrated Watershed Research Group. https://www.unbc.ca/integrated-watershed-research-group/koh-learning-our-watersheds-transforming-education-connecting-students-communities-and-waterways
University of Victoria. (2023). Indigenous plan. https://www.uvic.ca/ovpi/_assets/docs/uvic-indigenous-plan-2023.pdf
Wale, J. D., & Parrott, L. (2024). A framework for Indigenous climate resilience: A Gitxsan case study. Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien, 68(3), 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12897
Well Living House. (2025). Indigenous evaluation. St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto. http://www.welllivinghouse.com/
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.