Seven ways to get a grip on using participant observation in medical education research

Auteurs-es

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.81494

Résumé

Medical education phenomena are complex, and researchers need to use diverse methods to explore topics. Participant observation is a qualitative research method that connects researchers to human interactions, allowing them to experience firsthand behaviours, conversations, characteristics, and qualities related to the phenomenon under study. It can provide unique insights, beyond those of participant narratives, and enhance understanding. However, this method is rarely used in medical education research; it is challenging and resource-intensive to implement, which likely discourages researchers from using it. To help researchers get a grip on using it in medical education research, we offer seven recommendations for planning participant observation: Determine the study setting(s), Identify key interest-holders and establish relationships, Determine the researcher-participant relationship to be established, Take steps to minimize reactivity to research, Use knowledge to guide data collection procedures, Use knowledge to inform instrument development, and Anticipate possible dilemmas and be mindful of unanticipated ones. We urge researchers to consider participant observation when appropriate to advance methods in medical education research.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Kaylee Eady, University of Ottawa

Associate Professor, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Katherine A Moreau, University of Ottawa

Professor, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Références

1. Morse JM. Perspectives of the observer and the observed. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(2):155-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302239595

2. Guest G, Namey EE, Mitchell ML. Collecting qualitative data: a field manual for applied research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Inc. 2013. Chapter 3, Participant observation; p. 75-112. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781506374680.n3

3. DeWalt KM, DeWalt BR. Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers. 2nd ed. Plymouth (UK): AltaMira Press, 2011.

4. Blevins MD. Participant observation. In: Allen M, editor. The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Inc; 2017; p. 1188-1190. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411.n412

5. Merriam SB. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1998.

6. Jorgensen DL. Participant observation: a methodology for human studies. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Inc. 1989. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412985376

7. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed.; Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Inc.; 2013.

8. Paradis E, Sutkin G. Beyond a good story: from Hawthorne effect to reactivity in health professions education research. Med Educ. 2017;51:31-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13122

9. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Inc.; 2009.

10. Reid AM, Brown JM, Smith JM, Cope AC, Jamieson S. Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7:69-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2025-09-29

Comment citer

1.
Eady K, Moreau KA. Seven ways to get a grip on using participant observation in medical education research. Can. Med. Ed. J [Internet]. 29 sept. 2025 [cité 13 déc. 2025];. Disponible à: https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/81494

Numéro

Rubrique

Terrain glissant

Articles les plus lus du,de la,des même-s auteur-e-s