Impact of Program Review in Canadian Post-secondary Education: A Qualitative Case Study

Auteurs-es

  • Claire Sauve Vancouver Community College
  • Alana Hoare Thompson Rivers University
  • Gloria Ramirez Thompson Rivers University

Mots-clés :

program review, qulity assurance, post-secondary education, strategic planning, faculty agency

Résumé

Using a qualitative case study research design, this study examined the phenomenon of program review at a mid-sized vocational college in British Columbia, Canada, and the experiences of five department leaders and program coordinators engaging in program review. The study sought to answer the following questions: What is the experience of faculty and program coordinators leading the program review process? Is the program review meaningful? Is the program review manageable? Can a program review process be both meaningful and manageable? Are the meaningfulness and manageability of program review in conflict with one another? Participants recognized the potential impact of program review in terms of creating space for analytic and critical reflection to interrogate the influence of reviews on institutional strategic planning, advocacy for departmental and institutional resources, and assessment of program viability within the broader academic mission of the institution. However, complex power dynamics at play within program review for improvement versus for accountability were highlighted as a point of tension and resistance that prevents the realization of the ideals of program review.

Références

Barak, R. J. (2007). Thirty years of academic review and approval by state postsecondary coordinating and governing boards. State Higher Education Executive Officers. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED502182

Barak, R. J., & Breier, B. E. (1990). Successful program review: A practical guide to evaluating programs in academic settings (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Bresciani, M. J. (2010). Data-driven planning: Using assessment in strategic planning. New Directions for Student Services, 2010(132), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.374

Conrad, C. F., & Wilson, R. F. (1985). Academic program reviews: Institutional approaches, expectations, and controversies. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED264806.pdf

Coombs, V. (2017, February 6). Institutions should link program reviews to strategic plans. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/call-action-marketing-and-communications-higher-education/institutions-should-link-program

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802756

Davison, D., Patton, J., Eng, M., Hanna, K., Grimes-Hillman, M., Watson, I., Jackson, J., & Vazquez, U. (2009). Program review. California Community College, Academic Senate. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510580.pdf

de Valenzuela, J. S., Copeland, S. R., & Blalock, G. A. (2005). Unfulfilled expectations: Faculty participation and voice in university program evaluation. Teachers College Record, 107(10), 2227-2247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.005

Eastman, J., Jones, G. A., Trottier, C., & Bégin-Caouette, O. (2022). University governance in Canada: Navigating complexity. McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Ebersole, T. E. (2009). Postsecondary assessment: Faculty attitudes and levels of engagement. Assessment Update, 21(2), 2–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/au.212

Groen, J. F. (2017). Engaging in enhancement: Implications of participatory approaches in higher education quality assurance. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v10i0.4728

Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. (2016). Connecting theory and practice in qualitative research. In Theory and method in higher education research (Vol. 2, pp. 115-133). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220160000002006

Harlan, B. (2012). Meta-review: Systematic assessment of program review. US-China Education Review, A8, 740-754. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED536464

Hoare, A. (2024). Ethic of critique. In A. Hoare, O. B. Osuntade, & R. Patel (Eds.), Ethical educational leadership: Untangling ethical dilemmas and imagining alternative futures. TRU Open Press. https://leadershipethics.pressbooks.tru.ca/chapter/ethic-of-critique/

Hoare, A., Wagner, S., & Dishke Hondzel, C. (2024). Description of an approach for analyzing external program reviews to inform educational planning. Educational Planning Journal, 31(2), 39-50. https://isep.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Vol-31-No-2-Web-Version.pdf

Hoare, A., Dishke Hondzel, C., & Wagner, S. (2022). Forming an academic program review learning community: Description of a conceptual model. Quality Assurance in Education, 30(4), p. 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-01-2022-0023

Hoare A., Dishke Hondzel, C., Wagner, S., & Church, S. (2024). A course-based approach to conducting program review. Discover Education, 3, Article 5 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217-023-00085-4

Jarrell, L., & Kirby, D. (2024). Managing quality assurance at community colleges in Ontario, Canada: Experiences and perspectives of front-line quality managers. Quality Assurance in Education, 32(2), 274-290. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-11-2023-0194

Jayachandran, J., Neufeldt, C., Smythe, E., & Franke, O. (2019). Practical measures for institutional program reviews: A case study of a small post-secondary institution. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 49(2), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v49i2.188229

Jones, S. R., Torres, V., & Arminio, J. (2022). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Essential elements and issues (3rd edition). Routledge.

Kelchen, R. (2018). Higher education accountability. John Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.58123

Kleniewski, N. (2003). Program review as a win-win opportunity. AAHE Bulletin, 55(9). https://www.aahea.org/articles/win-win.htm

Lindauer, J. R., & Coward, P. A. (2021). Assessment of student learning in the arts, humanities, social sciences, and sciences. In J. R. Lindauer & P. A. Coward (Eds.), Exemplars of Assessment in Higher Education Diverse Approaches to Addressing Accreditation Standards (pp. 26–38). Stylus Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444701-4

Lock, J., Hill, S. L., & Dyjur, P. (2018). Living the curriculum review: Perspectives from three leaders. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 48(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v48i1.187975

McGowan, V. (2019). Not too small to be strategic: The state of academic program review guidelines and instrumentation in public institutions. Administrative Issues Journal Education Practice and Research, 9(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1221214

Mets, L. A. (1995). Lessons learned from program review experiences. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995(86), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.37019958608

Merriam S. & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.) Jossey-Bass.

Ministry of Postsecondary Education and Future Skills. (2024, September). Quality assessment process and criteria: BC public postsecondary institutions. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/education/post-secondary-education/institution-resources-administration/degree-authorization/bc_public_institution_quality_assessment_handbook.pdf

Mourad, R. P. (2017). Social control and free inquiry: Consequences of Foucault for the pursuit of knowledge in higher education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 66(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1379593

Mussawy, S. A. J., & Rossman, G. B. (2018). Quality assurance and accreditation in Afghanistan: Faculty members’ perceptions from selected universities. Higher Learning Research Communications, 8(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1201352

Neufeldt, C., Smythe, E., Jayachandran, J., & Franke, O. (2023). Cyclical program reviews at smaller post-secondary institutions: Can the time and effort be justified? The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), Article 9, https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.2.14417

Openo, J. A., Laverty, C., Kolomitro, K., Borin, P., Goff, L., Stranach, M., & Gomaa, N. (2017). Bridging the divide: Leveraging the scholarship of teaching and learning for quality enhancement. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.2.6

Senter, M. S., Ciabattari, T., & Amaya, N. V. (2020). Sociology departments and program review: Chair perspectives on process and outcomes. Teaching Sociology, 49(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X20970268

Skolnik, M. L. (2016). How academic program review can foster intellectual conformity and stifle diversity of thought and method. The Journal of Higher Education, 60(6), 619–643. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981945

Sonday, A., Ramugondo, E., & Kathard, H. (2020). Case study and narrative inquiry as merged methodologies: A critical narrative perspective. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940692093788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937880

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.

Sullivan, P. (2012). Qualitative data analysis using a dialogical approach. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268391

Vettori, O. (2018). Shared misunderstandings? Competing and conflicting meaning structures in quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 24(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2018.1491786

Weiner, W. F. (2009). Establishing a culture of assessment. Academe, 95(4), 28–32. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2009/JA/Feat/wein.htm

Whedbee, J. C. (2009). A narrative analysis using multiple case studies of nursing graduates who overcame academic adversity (Publication No. 1538) [Doctoral dissertation, Andrews University]. Andrews University. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/1538

Téléchargements

Publié

2026-05-15

Numéro

No. 208 (2026)

Rubrique

Articles

Licence

© Claire Sauve, Alana Hoare, Gloria Ramirez 2026

Licence Creative Commons

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

Les auteurs dont les articles sont publiés dans la Revue acceptent les conditions suivantes :

  1. Les auteurs conservent leurs droits d’auteur et accordent à la Revue un droit de première publication, les travaux faisant en même temps l’objet d’une licence d'attribution Creative Commons  autorisant d’autres parties à diffuser les travaux, sous réserve d’une mention de l’auteur et de la publication initiale dans la RCAPE.

  2. Il est permis aux auteurs de conclure des ententes contractuelles distinctes additionnelles en vue de la diffusion non exclusive de la version de travaux parus dans la Revue (p. ex. pour enregistrement dans un dépôt institutionnel ou inclusion dans un ouvrage), à la condition d’inclure une mention de la parution initiale dans la RCAPE.

  3. Les auteurs sont autorisés et encouragés à faire paraître leurs travaux en ligne (p. ex. dans des dépôts institutionnels ou dans leurs sites Web) avant et pendant le processus d’évaluation, ce qui peut déboucher sur des échanges productifs et favoriser et faire que les travaux publiés soient cités plus tôt et plus fréquemment