Navigating Turbulent Waters: Leading One Manitoba School in a Time of Crisis
Keywords:
leadership adaptations, environmental pressures, COVID-19Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly changed the practice of school leadership, requiring greater flexibility, creativity, and innovation. Guided by institutional theory, this paper suggests that leadership adaptations are influenced by environmental pressures such as coercive (e.g., from governmental or regulatory agencies), mimetic (e.g., attempts to emulate best practices from other schools), and normative pressures (e.g., professional standards endorsed by professional societies or unions). By using a qualitative co-constructed autoethnographic approach (See Kempster & Iszatt-White, 2012), the paper presents the Covid-19 timeline in Manitoba, identifying stakeholders and associated environmental pressures. It also features the personal leadership adaptations experienced by a school principal (Susan). The findings suggest that coercive pressures are mostly associated with creativity and inventive leadership practices. Mimetic pressures may lead to copying behaviours, and normative pressures are associated with enhanced foundational knowledges, all depending on contextual factors. The findings also highlight the significant emotional and physical toll the pandemic has taken on school principals.a
References
Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 373–395.
Ashworth, R. E., Boyne, G., & Delbridge, R. (2005). Institutional pressures on public sector organizations: An empirical test of isomorphism. ORCA. http://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/53116
Azorín, C. (2020). Beyond COVID-19 supernova. Is another education coming? Journal of
Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 381-390.
Bagwell, J. (2020). Leading through a pandemic: Adaptive leadership and purposeful action. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 5, 30–34. https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v5iSl.2781
Bartlett, N., & Freeze, T. (2019). Assess, sort, classify: “Othering” of Indigenous students in Manitoba’s schools. Exceptionality Education International, 29(2), 91–109.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Boyle, M., & Parry, K. (2007). Telling the whole story: The case for organizational
autoethnography. Culture and Organization, 13(3), 185–190.
Brock, S. E. (2002). Estimating the appropriate crisis response. In S. E. Brock, P. J. Lazarus, & S. R. Jimerson (Eds.), Best practices in school crisis prevention and intervention (pp. 355-366). National Association of School Psychologists.
Burch, P., Bingham, A. J., & Miglani, N. (2020). Combining institutional and distributed frameworks in studies of school leadership. Peabody Journal of Education, 95, 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2020.1800176
Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11, 461–466.
Caravella, K. (2011). Mimetic, coercive and normative influences in institutionalization of organizational practices: The case of distance learning in higher education [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Florida Atlantic University Digital Library. https://fau.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/fau%3A3618/datastream/OBJ/view/Mimetic_coercive__and_normative_influences_in_institutionalization_of_organizational_practices.pdf
Coombs, W. T. (2014). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. SAGE Publications.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2002). Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 33(1), 35-61.
Darmody, M., & Smyth, E. (2016). Primary school principals’ job satisfaction and occupational stress. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 115–128.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224892279_’The_Iron_Cage_Revisited__in _Organizational_Fields
Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Rowman Altamira.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische sozialforschung, 12(1), Article 10.
Fernandez, A. A., & Shaw, G. P. (2020). Academic leadership in a time of crisis: The coronavirus and COVID-19. Journal of Leadership Studies, 14(1), 39–45.
Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2020). Call for papers for a special issue on COVID-19 and novel mixed methods methodological approaches during catastrophic social changes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 281-287.
Government of Manitoba. (2020a). Manitoba pandemic response system. https://www.gov.mb.ca/covid19/restartmb/prs/
Government of Manitoba. (2020b). Enrolment report September 30, 2020. https://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/finance/sch_enrol/enrolment_2020.pdf
Government of Manitoba. (2020c). Schools in Manitoba 2019/2020. https://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/schools/2020_mb_schools_book.pdf
Government of Manitoba. (2020d). Welcoming our students back: Restoring safe schools. https://www.gov.mb.ca/covid19/restoring/rss-practice-guidance.html
Government of Manitoba. (2021). Restoring safe schools: Planning guide for 2021-2022 school year. https://news.gov.mb.ca/asset_library/en/newslinks/2021/08/K-12_FallPlanning_Aug2021_FNL.pdf
Harris, A. (2020). COVID-19: School leadership in crisis? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0045
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). COVID 19–school leadership in disruptive times. School
Leadership Management, 40(4), 243–247 https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811479
Harwati, L. N. (2013). Crisis management: Determining specific strategies and leadership style for effective outcomes. Crisis, 2(2), 170-181.
Hemmer, L., & Elliff, D. S. (2020). Leaders in action: The experiences of seven Texas superintendents before, during, and after Hurricane Harvey. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(6), 964–985.
Hokkanen, S. (2017). Analyzing personal embodied experiences: Autoethnography, feelings, and fieldwork. Translation & Interpreting, 9(1), 24–35.
Jarvis, A., & Mishra, P. K. (2020). Leadership for learning: Lessons from the great lockdown. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1862920
Kempster, S., & Iszatt-White, M. (2012). Towards co-constructed coaching: Exploring the integration of coaching and co-constructed autoethnography in leadership development. Management Learning, 44(4), 319–336.
Kempster, S., & Stewart, J. (2010). Becoming a leader: A co-produced autoethnographic exploration of situated learning of leadership practice. Management Learning, 41(2), 205–219.
Kidson, P., Lipscombe, K., & Tindall-Ford, S. K. (2020). Co-designing educational policy: Professional voice and policy making post-COVID. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1372&context=asshpapers
Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2009). Turnaround schools: Leadership lessons. Education
Canada, 49(2), 26–29.
Maydell, E. (2010). Methodological and analytical dilemmas in autoethnographic research.
Journal of Research Practice, 6(1), 1-13.
Miller, P. W. (2018). The nature of school leadership. Palgrave Macmillan.
Moilanen, J. H. (2015). The wisdom of tacit knowing-in-action and mission command. Adult Learning, 26(3), 101–108.
Netolicky, D. M. (2020). School leadership during a pandemic: Navigating tensions. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0017.
Noppe, R., Yager, S., Webb, C., & Sheng, B. (2013). Decision-making and problem-solving of superintendents confronted by dilemmas. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8(1), 103–120.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
Pollock, K. (2020). School leaders’ work during the COVID-19 pandemic: A two-pronged approach. International Studies in Educational Administration/CCEAM, 48(3), 38–44. http://cceam.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ISEA-2020-48-3.pdf
Smith, L., & Riley, D. (2012). School leadership in times of crisis. School Leadership & Management, 32(1), 57–71.
Statistics Canada. (2016). Aboriginal peoples: Fact sheet for Manitoba. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/89-656-x/89-656-x2016008-eng.htm
Thornton, K. (2021). Leading through COVID-19: New Zealand secondary principals describe their reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 393-409.
Tourish, D. (2020). Introduction to the special issue: Why the coronavirus crisis is also a crisis of leadership. Leadership, 16(3), 261-272.
Van Wart, M. (2005). Dynamics of leadership in public service: Theory and practice. ME Sharpe.
Virella, P. M. (2020). Leading through the “influx”: Leadership responses and the
influence of a political spectacle. Journal of School Leadership, 32(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1052684620972070
Wall, S. (2006). An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 1–11.
Wallin, D. C., & Newton, P. (2014). Teaching principals in small rural schools: “My cup overfloweth”. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 60(4), 708–725.
Wang, F. (2021). Principals’ self- and interpersonal leadership amid work intensification. Journal of School Leadership, 31(5), 396–427.
Wang, F., Hauseman, C., & Pollock, K. (2022). “I am here for the students”: Principals’ perception of accountability amid work intensification. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34, 33-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09368-6
Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential.
Consulting Journal: Practice and Research, 2, 81–93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232567495_Why_flexible_and_adaptive_leadership_is_essential
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Merli Tamtik, Susan Darazsi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
