A Critical Discourse Analysis of the University of Ottawa’s Internationalization Strategy Report from a Third World perspective
This paper analyzes the Internationalization Strategy of the University of Ottawa according to the Third World Approach to International Law (TWAIL) methodology. It argues that the Strategy silences global unevenness, avoids any pedagogical discussion and reproduces the neoliberal rationality about globalization. Also, the liberal multiculturalism evoked in the Strategy hinders the incorporation of marginal cultural narratives and it is driven by the promotion of economic assets for the university. As the internationalization of the curriculum is not prioritized, it does not consider the reproduction of developed countries’ academic canons and the obstacles to the incorporation of knowledge produced in Third World countries, indicating no concerns with the prevalence of a neocolonial bias. Alternatives to balance this situation are offered, such as administrative recommendations, the strengthening of the public debate, and the attention to diversity as a criterion for research funding.
Copyright (c) 2020 Vinicius Alves Barreto da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.