School Principals’ Job Satisfaction: The Effects of Work Intensification

Fei Wang, Katina Pollock, Cameron Hauseman

Abstract


Abstract

This study examines principals’ job satisfaction in relation to their work intensification. Frederick Herzberg’s two-factor theory was used to shed light on how motivating and maintenance factors affect principals’ job satisfaction. Logistic multiple regressions were used in the analysis of survey data that were collected from 2,701 elementary and secondary school principal members of the Ontario Principals’ Council in Ontario, Canada. Approximately1,423 valid cases were used in data analysis. Results show that principals’ work intensification affects their job satisfaction. As a result of work intensification, motivating factors, such as workplace challenge, recognition from the employer, and work demand; and maintenance factors such as external policy influence, organizational support, principals’ relationships with teachers, superintendents, and unions are having a significant impact on principals’ job satisfaction. These factors affect the extent to which they are able to contribute effectively to improving student achievement and school performance.


Keywords


Job satisfaction, work intensification, motivating and maintenance factors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alberta Teachers’ Association. (2014). The future of the principalship in Canada. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Teachers Association.

Alsaeedi, F., & Male, T. (2013). Transformational leadership and globalization: Attitudes of school principals in Kuwait. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 640–657.

Armstrong, D. (2015). Transition to the role of principal and vice-principal: Final report. The Institute for Educational Leadership. Retrieved from https://www.education-leadership-ontario.ca/resources/home/download/97/Role%20of%20Principal_FINAL.pdf.

Bakotic, D. (2016). Relationship between job satisfaction and organizational performance. Economic Research, 29(1), 118–130.

Bauer, S. C., & Brazer, S. D. (2013). The impact of isolation on the job satisfaction of new principals. Journal of School Leadership, 23(1), 152–177.

Bull, I. H. F. (2005). The relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment amongst high school teachers in disadvantaged areas in the Western Cape. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of the Western Cape, Cape Town.

Cardno, C., & Youngs, H. (2013). Leadership development for experienced New Zealand principals: Perceptions of effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(3), 256–271.

Chang, Y. J., Leach, N., & Anderman, E. M. (2015). The role of perceived autonomy support in principals’ affective organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Social Psychology of Education, 18(2), 315–336.

Chaplain, R. P. (2001). Stress and job satisfaction among primary headteachers: A question of balance? Educational Management & Administration, 29(2), 197–215.

Cheng, Y. C. (1994). Principal’s leadership as a critical factor for school performance: Evidence from multi-levels of primary schools. Journal of School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 299–317.

Cherubini, L. (2010). An analysis of Ontario Aboriginal education policy: Critical and interpretive perspectives. McGill Journal of Education, 45(1), 9–26.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. (7th ed.). London: Routledge-Falmer.

Darmody, M., & Smyth, E. (2016). Primary school principals’ job satisfaction and occupational stress. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 115–128.

Drago-Severson, E. (2012). The need for principal renewal: The promise of sustaining principals through principal-to-principal reflective practice. Teachers College Record, 114(12), 1–56.

Drummond, A., & Halsey, R. J. (2013). How hard can it be? The relative job demands of rural, regional and remote Australian educational leaders. Educational Research, 57(1), 19–31.

Earley, P., & Bubb, S. (2013). A day in the life of new headteachers: Learning from observation. Journal of Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 41(6), 782–799.

Eckman, E. W. (2004). Similarities and differences in role conflict, role commitment, and job satisfaction for female and male high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(3), 366–387.

Eckman, E. W., & Kelber, S. T. (2010). Female traditional principals and co-principals: Experiences of role conflict and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Change, 11(3), 205–219.

Federici, R. A., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2012). Principal self-efficacy: Relations with burnout, job satisfaction and motivation to quit. Social Psychology of Education, 15(3), 295–320. doi:10.1007/s11218-012-9183-5

Guterman, J. (2007, March 23). Where have all the principals gone?: The acute school leader shortage. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/where-have-all-principals-gone

Hancock, D. R., & Müller, U. (2014). Disincentives to remaining a school principal: Perspectives of German and U.S. principals. New Waves: Educational Research & Development, 17(1), 66–79.

Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH.: World Publishing Company.

Herzberg, F., Maunser, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York, NY.: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Hulin, C. L., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Job attitudes. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 255–276). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

King, N. (1970). Clarification and evaluation of the two-factor theory of job satisfaction. Psychological Bulletin, 74(1), 18-13.

Kwan, P., & Walker, A. (2008). Vice-principalship in Hong Kong: Aspirations, competencies, and satisfaction. Journal of School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(1), 73–97.

Leithwood, K. (2014). LSA theory of action. Toronto: Leading Student Achievement: Networks for Learning. Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.org/LSA/about.shtml

Leithwood, K., & Azah, V. N. (2014). Executive summary: Elementary and secondary principals’ and vice principals’ workload studies. Catholic Principals’ Council of Ontario. Retrieved from https://www.cpco.on.ca/files/9814/1598/3415/Executive_Summary_October_7_2014_Final.pdf

Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 69(2), 236–247.

Lin, Y. H. (2013). Principal hiring practices: Stories the principals tell (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/4677/

Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.1297–1349). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Markow, D., Macia, L., & Lee, H. (2013). The Metlife survey of the American teacher: Challenges for school leadership. New York, NY: Metlife, Inc.

Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.

Moorman, R. H. (1993). The influence of cognitive and affective based job satisfaction measures on the relationship between satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviour. Human Relations, 46(6), 759–776.

Morris, M. (2004). The public school as workplace: The principal as a key element in teacher satisfaction. Los Angeles: California University.

Muse, M. D., & Abrams, L. M. (2011). An investigation of school leadership priorities. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 77(4), 49.

Mwawasi, F. M. (2014). Technology leadership and ICT use: Strategies for capacity building for ICT integration. Journal of Learning for Development, 1(2), 1–7.

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007a). Aboriginal education strategy.

Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/aboriginal/

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007b). Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit education policy framework. Toronto, ON: Aboriginal Education Office. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/aboriginal/fnmiFramework.pdf

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2009). Ontario equity and inclusive education strategy. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Education.

Oplatka, I., & Mimon, R. (2008). Women principals' conceptions of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction: Alternative view? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(2), 135–153. doi: 10.1080/13603120701576225

Owens, R. G., & Valesky T. C. (2011). Organizational behaviour in education: Leadership and school reform (10th ed.). Boston & Toronto: Allyn & Bacon.

Pollock, K., Wang, F., & Hauseman, C. (2014). The changing nature of principals’ work: Final Report for the Ontario Principals’ Council. Toronto, Canada.

Pollock, K., Wang, F., & Hauseman, D. C. (2015). Complexity and volume: An inquiry into factors that drive principals’ work. Societies, 5, 537–565.

Reames, E., Kochan, F., & Zhu, L. (2014). Factors influencing principals’ retirement decisions: A southern US perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(1), 40–60.

Saiti, A., & Fassoulis, K. (2012). Job satisfaction: Factor analysis of Greek primary school principals’ perceptions. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(4), 370–380.

Smith, D. B., & Shields, J. (2013). Factors related to social service workers' job satisfaction: Revisiting Herzberg's motivation to work. Administration in Social Work. 37(2), 189–198.

Society for Human Resource Management. (2016). Employee job satisfaction and engagement: Revitalizing a changing workforce: A research report by the Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/Documents/2016-Employee-Job-Satisfaction-and-Engagement-Report.pdf

Sodoma, B., & Else, D. (2009). Job satisfaction of Iowa public school principals. Rural Educator, 31(1), 10–18.

Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 173–194.

Zhu, Y. H. (2013). A review of job satisfaction. Asian Social Science, 9(1), 293–298.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Fei Wang, Katina Pollock, Cameron Hauseman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.