(Re)thinking the Adoption of Inclusive Education Policy: A Conceptual Shift
Keywords:
Inclusive education policy, implementation, enactment, context, schools, policy actors, practiceAbstract
The purpose of this article is to advance a proposal for the analysis of the adoption of inclusive education policies. In particular, I use the notion of ‘Policy Enactment’ to re-conceptualize the process of putting inclusive education policies into practice. The argument is that the traditional ‘implementation’ model to analyze the adoption of inclusive education policies devalues the significant role of context in both policy analysis research and practice. Analyzing education policies based on the construct of ‘enactment’ offers a context-informed approach that can help policy actors and researchers to better understand how inclusive education policies are incorporated into practices. The paper concludes that a policy enactment perspective empowered by a Neo-Institutional lens, is a more robust tool for analyzing inclusive education policies as their translation is far from being a mere upfront conversion of text into action.
References
Ahmmed, M., & Mullick, J. (2014). Implementing inclusive education in primary schools in Bangladesh: Recommended strategies. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 13(2), 167-180. doi:10.1007/s10671-013-9156-2
Ainscow, M. (2007). From special education to effective schools for all: A review of progress so far. In L. Florian (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education (pp. 146-159). London: SAGE.
Ainscow, M. (2012). Developing equitable education systems. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Ball, S.J. (1994). Education reform. A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Ball, S. J. (2015). What is policy? 21 years later: Reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(3), 306-313. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1015279
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bidwell, C. (2006). Varieties of institutional theory: Traditions and prospects for educational research. In H. D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 33-50). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585. doi:10.1080/01596306.2011.601555
Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547-560. doi:10.1080/02680931003698544.
Bourke, P. E. (2010). Inclusive education reform in Queensland: Implications for policy and practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(2), 183-193. doi:10.1080/13603110802504200
Council of Ministers of Education in Canada (2008). “Report Two: Inclusive Education in Canada: The Way of the Future.” Retrieved from Council of Ministers of Education Canada website. http://www.cmec.ca/Publications/Lists/Publications/Attachments/122/ICE2008-reportscanada.en.pdf
DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Engelbrecht, P., Nel, M., Smit, S., & van Deventer, M. (2016). The idealism of education policies and the realities in schools: The implementation of inclusive education in South Africa. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(5), 520-535. doi:10.1080/13603116.2015.1095250
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
Florian, L. (1998). An examination of the practical problems associated with the implementation of inclusive education policies. Support for Learning, 13(3), 105-108. doi:10.1111/1467-9604.00069
Forlin, C. (2010). Teacher education for inclusion: Changing paradigms and innovative approaches. C. Forlin (Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Forlin, C. (2010a). Developing and implementing quality inclusive education in Hong Kong: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 10, 177-184. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01162.x
Hamdan, A. R., Anuar, M. K., & Khan, A. (2016). Implementation of co-teaching approach in an inclusive classroom: Overview of the challenges, readiness, and role of special education teacher. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 289-298. doi:10.1007/s12564-016-9419-8
Heimans, S. (2012). Coming to matter in practice: Enacting education policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33, 313–326. doi:10.1080/01596306.2012.666083
Heimans, S. (2014). Education policy enactment research: Disrupting continuities. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(2), 307-316. doi:10.1080/01596306.2013.832566
Immergut, E. M. (1998). The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics & Society, 26(1), 5-34.
Ineland, J., Pedagogiska institutionen, Umeå universitet, & Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten. (2015). Logics and ambivalence – professional dilemmas during implementation of an inclusive education practice. Education Inquiry, 6(1), 53. doi:10.3402/edui.v6.26157
Jepperson, R. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143-163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnstone, C. J., & Chapman, D. W. (2009). Contributions and constraints to the implementation of inclusive education in Lesotho. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 56(2), 131-148. doi:10.1080/10349120902868582
Keefe, E. B., Rossi, P. J., de Valenzuela, J. S., & Howarth, S. (2000). Reconceptualizing teacher preparation for inclusive classrooms: A description of the dual license program at the University of New Mexico. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25(2), 72–82.
Kelly, A., Devitt, C., O'Keffee, D., & Donovan, A. M. (2014). Challenges in implementing inclusive education in Ireland: Principal's views of the reasons students aged 12+ are seeking enrollment to special schools. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 11(1), 68-81. doi:10.1111/jppi.12073
Kim, Y. W. (2013). Inclusive education in Korea: Policy, practice, and challenges. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 10(2), 79-81. doi:10.1111/jppi.12034
Koyama, J. (2015). When things come undone: The promise of dissembling education policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 548–559.
Lawrence, T. (2008). Power, institutions, and organizations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 170-197). London; Los Angeles: SAGE.
Loreman, T. (2010). Essential inclusive education-related outcomes for Alberta preservice teachers. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 56(2), 124.
Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Ball, S. (2015). 'Where you stand depends on where you sit': The social construction of policy enactments in the (English) secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 485-499. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.977022
March J. G. & Olsen J. P. (2006). Elaborating the “new institutionalism”. In R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions (pp. 3-22). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
May, P. J. (2015). Implementation failures revisited: Policy regime perspectives. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3-4), 277-299. doi:10.1177/0952076714561505
Meyer, J. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 5577.
Mittler, P. J. (2000). Working towards inclusive education: Social contexts. London: D. Fulton Publishers.
Mosia, P. A. (2014). Threats to inclusive education in Lesotho: An overview of policy and implementation challenges. Africa Education Review, 11(3), 292-292. doi:10.1080/18146627.2014.934989
Mulcahy, D. (2015). Re/assembling spaces of learning in Victorian government schools: Policy enactments, pedagogic encounters and micropolitics. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 500–514.
Naicker, S. (2007). From policy to practice: A South-African perspective on implementing inclusive education policy. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 3(1), 1.
Ontario College of Teachers (2013). Looking at...Enhanced Teacher Education. Toronto, ON: Ontario College of Teachers.
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2014). Equity and inclusive education in Ontario schools: Guidelines for policy development and implementation: realizing the promise of diversity. Toronto: Ministry of Education.
Palmer, D., Biggart, N., & Dick, B. (2008). Is the new institutionalism a theory? In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 739-768). London; Los Angeles: SAGE.
Peters, S. J. (2007). Education for all? A historical analysis of international inclusive education policy and individuals with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 18(2), 98-108. doi:10.1177/10442073070180020601
Poon-McBrayer, K. F., & Wong, P. (2013). Inclusive education services for children and youth with disabilities: Values, roles and challenges of school leaders. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(9), 1520-1525. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.06.009
Powell, W. W. (2007). The new institutionalism. In The international encyclopedia of organization studies: Sage Publishers. Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/group/song/papers/NewInstitutionalism.pdf
Powell, W. W. & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276-298). London; Los Angeles: SAGE.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Radaelli, C. M., Dente, B., & Dossi, S. (2012). Recasting institutionalism: Institutional analysis and public policy. European Political Science, 11(4), 537.
Riveros, A. & Viczko, M. (2016). The enactment of professional learning policies: performativity and multiple ontologies. In M.Viczko & A. Riveros (Eds.). Assemblage, enactment and Agency: Educational policy perspectives. (pp. 55-69). New York: Routledge
Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1-25.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Scott, W. R. & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization of societal sectors: propositions and early evidence. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108-140). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sehring, J. (2009). The politics of water institutional reform in neo-patrimonial states: A comparative analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. GWV: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Sin, C. (2013). Lost in translation: The meaning of learning outcomes across national and institutional policy contexts. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.806463.
Sin, C. (2014). The policy object: A different perspective on policy enactment in higher education. Higher Education, 68(3), 435-448. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9721-5
Singh, P., Heimans, S., & Glasswell, K. (2014). Policy enactment, context and performativity: Ontological politics and researching Australian national partnership policies. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 826-844. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.891763
Slee, R. (2010). Political economy, inclusive education and teacher education. In C. Forlin (Ed.),Teacher education for inclusion: Changing paradigms and innovative approaches (pp. 13-22). New York, NY: Routledge.
Thompson, S. A., Lyons, W., & Timmons, V. (2015). Inclusive education policy: What the leadership of canadian teacher associations has to say about it. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(2), 121-140. doi:10.1080/13603116.2014.908964
Vekeman, E., Devos, G., & Tuytens, M. (2015). The influence of teachers’ expectations on principals’ implementation of a new teacher evaluation policy in Flemish secondary education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 27(2), 129-151. doi:10.1007/s11092-014-9203-4
Viczko, M., & Riveros, A. (2015). Assemblage, enactment and agency: Educational policy perspectives. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 479-484. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.980488
Vorapanya, S., & Dunlap, D. (2014). Inclusive education in Thailand: Practices and challenges. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(10), 1014-1028. doi:10.1080/13603116.2012.693400
Werts, A. B., & Brewer, C. A. (2015). Reframing the study of policy implementation: Lived experience as politics. Educational Policy, 29(1), 206-229. doi:10.1177/0895904814559247
Young, T., & Lewis, W. D. (2015). Educational policy implementation revisited. Educational Policy, 29(1), 3-17. doi:10.1177/0895904815568936
Zucker, L. G. (1991). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 83-107). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
