Creative Crossroads: Combining Engineering and Arts for Creative Development
AbstractThe significant global challenges faced in the world today require innovative solutions and creative thinking. In traditional postsecondary education, technical programs such as engineering often focus on technical competencies as opposed to creative thinking. However, as industry demands for creative technical employees continue to increase, postsecondary institutions must adapt their education accordingly. This work combines ideation and creative writing techniques with engineering design to turn initial ideas into significant ideas using an avant-garde literary device referred to as `pataphysics. Tested by both faculty and student demographics, the final three-module framework uses disruptive thinking that leads to the accelerated development of creative solutions.
Daly, Shanna R., Mosyjowski, Erika A., & Seifert, Colleen M. (2014). Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 103, No. 3, pp. 417-449. American Society for Engineering Education.
George Lucas Educational Foundation. (2008). Randy Nelson on Learning and Working in the Collaborative Age. Edutopia video. Accessed online: https://www.edutopia.org/video/randy-nelson-learning-and-working-collaborative-age
Gomez Puente, S.M., van Eijck, M., Jochems, W. (2013). A samples literature review of design-based learning approaches: a search for key characteristics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, V23, Issue 3, pp. 717 – 732.
Grand Challenges Canada. (2018). Accessed online: http://www.grandchallenges.ca/
Hugill, A. (2012). `Pataphysics: A Useless Guide. MIT Press.
Intel Corporation. Intel education: inspiring the future, 2012. Accessed online: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/education/intel-in-education.html
Kelly, R. (2016). Creative Development: Transforming Education Through Design Thinking, Innovation and Invention. Brush Education, 2016
Liu, Z., & Schonwetter, D. (2004). Teaching creativity in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, V20, Issue 5, pp. 801 – 808.
Mann, C. (2000). The end of Moore’s law? MIT Technology Review. Accessed online: http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/400710/the-end-of-moores-law/
Plattner, H. (2011). An Introduction to Design Thinking Process Guide. Institute of Design at Stanford.
Robinson, K., & Azzam, A. M. (2009). Why creativity now? (interview). Educational Leadership, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 22-26.
UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO and Sustainable Development Goals. https://en.unesco.org/sdgs
University of Calgary Education. Imperial Oil science technology engineering mathematics education initiative, 2018. Accessed online: http://www.ucalgary.ca/IOSTEM/.
Wilson, L.O. (2018). Anderson and Krathwohl – Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised. Accessed online: https://thesecondprinciple.com/teaching-essentials/beyond-bloom-cognitive-taxonomy-revised/
Copyright (c) 2019 Emily Marasco, Laleh Behjat, Robert Kelly, Shannon Maguire
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-NC-ND) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.