Local Values in Governance: Legacy of Choho in Forest and School Management in a Tamang Community in Nepal

  • Mahesh Nath Parajuli Kathmandu University
  • Indra Mani Rai Kathmandu University
  • Prakash C Bhattarai Kathmandu University
  • Suresh Gautam Kathmandu University

Abstract

The political modernization in Nepal accelerated since 1951 when the country changed its course owing to a popular movement that was acclaimed as the beginning of democracy in the country. However, the governments continued cultural and political homogenization.  This has been so in the case of local governance practices as well. Modern governing structures/institutions are guided by the state formed policies and elite-based power structures despite the fact that different ethnic groups in Nepal have their own traditional self-governance systems. In this context, this article unfolds the inheritance of traditional practices of the Tamang community (one of the major ethnic groups of Nepal), in a village, in the district adjoining Kathmandu valley, within the modern structures of governance of forest and school management systems. The paper argues that there is a legacy of the traditional institution, the Choho, though the system of Choho itself has now largely disappeared. This paper, based on ethnographic fieldwork, presents the accounts of Choho and examples of how the particular norms, values, beliefs, and practices are still in practice challenging and denying the modern/state formed mechanisms of governing the forests and schools in the village. The paper further argues that given the modern governance system, the traditional souvenir exchange practice that was rooted in the notion of honour and respect has now shifted towards the practice of giving and receiving gifts based upon the principle of reciprocal benefits that could be described as a bribe.

References

Acharya, K. K. (2018). Local governance restructuring in Nepal: From government to governmentality. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 12, 37-49.

Bhatta, P., Adhikari, L., Thada, M., & Rai, R. (2008). Structures of denial: Student representation in Nepal’s higher education. Studies in Nepali History and Society, 13(2), 235-263.

Bhattachan, K. (2002). Traditional local governance in Nepal. Paper presented at a national seminar on Strengthening Decentralization and Good Governance in Nepal organized by the Political Science Association of Nepal (POLSAN) and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES), Kathmandu, Nepal.

Bhattachan, Y. K. (2007). Democracies in the indigenous organizations of Nepal. In B. N. Koirala, A. Khadka, & R. Khadka (Eds.), Democratic indigenous practices of Nepal (pp. 7-13). Kathmandu, Nepal: Nepal Center for Creative Research.

Brewer, J. D. (2000). Ethnography. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

Central Bureau of Statistics. (2012). National population and housing census 2011: National report. Kathmandu, Nepal: Author.

Collins P., & Gallinat, A. (2010). The ethnographic self as resource: An introduction. In P. Collins & A. Gallinat (Eds.), The ethnographic self as resource: Writing memory and experience into ethnography (pp. 1-24). Oxford, England: Berghahn Books.

Dapilah, F., Bonye, S. Z., & Dawda, T. D. (2013). From conquerors to development partners: The changing roles of traditional authorities in local level development and governance in Ghana. Scottish Journal of Arts, Social Sciences and Scientific Studies, 11(2), 3-16.

Day, G. (2006). Community and everyday life. New York, NY: Routledge.

Forsey, M. G. (2010). Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography, 11(4), 558 - 572.

Government of Nepal. (2013). Forest nationalization act 2013. Kathmandu, Nepal: Author.

Government of Nepal. (2002). Leasehold forest policy 2002. Kathmandu, Nepal: Author.

Government of Nepal. (1995). Forest rules 1995. Kathmandu, Nepal: Author.

Government of Nepal. (1993). Forest act 1993. Kathmandu, Nepal: Author.

Government of Nepal. (1971a). Education act 1971. Kathmandu, Nepal: Author.

Government of Nepal. (1971b). National education system plan 1971. Kathmandu, Nepal: Author.

Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Holmberg, D. (2016). Tamang Lhochhar and new Nepal. In N. D. Gellner, L. S. Hausner, & C. Letizia (Eds.), Religion, secularism, and ethnicity in contemporary Nepal (pp. 302-325). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

Holmberg, D. H. (1989). Order in paradox: Myth, ritual, and exchange among Nepal’s Tamang. New Delhi, India: Totilal Banarsidass Publishers.

Khan, O. (2007). Policy, identity, and community cohesion: How race equality fits. In M. Wetherell, M. Lafleche, & R. Berkeley (Eds.), Identity, ethnic diversity, and community cohesion (pp. 40-58). London, England: Sage.

Kukuczka, A. (2011). Negotiating ethnic identity in the Himalaya. The Tamang in Nepal. South Asia Chronicle, 1, 393-437.

Levine, N. E. (1987). Caste, state, and ethnic boundaries in Nepal. The Journal of Asian Studies, 46(1), 71-88.

Macionis, J., & Parrillo, V. N. (2011). Cities and urban life (5th ed.). New Delhi, India: PHI Learning.

Mauss, M. (2002). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London, England: Routledge.

Murchison, J. (2010). Ethnography essentials: Designing, conducting, and presenting your research. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Musharbash, Y. (2008). Yuendumu everyday: Contemporary life in remote aboriginal Australia. Canberra, Australia: Aboriginal Studies Press.

Non-Governmental Organization Federation of Nepalese Indigenous Nationalities. (2011). Situation analysis of traditional local governance system (Choho Ghanba) of Tamang ethnic group. Kathmandu, Nepal: Author.

Oppong, S. H. (2013). Migration and reconstruction of identity. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 2(2), 163-169.

Shrestha, N.R. (1997). In the name of development: A reflection on Nepal. Kathmandu: Educational Enterprise.

Stiller, F. L., S.J. and Yadav, R. P. (1979). Planning for people. Kathmandu: Sahayogi Prakashan

Tamang, M. S. (2009). Tamang activism, history, and territorial consciousness. In D. N. Gellner (Ed.), Ethnic activism and civil society in South Asia (pp. 269–290). New Delhi, India: Sage.

Tamang, P. (2003). Customary law and conservation in the Himalaya: The case of Nepal. Paper presented at the 5th World Parks Congress, Durban, South Africa.

Thapa, N. (2009). Country profile of excluded groups of Nepal. (Unpublished manuscript).

Whitehead, T. L. (2005). Basic classical ethnographic research methods: Secondary data analysis, fieldwork, observation/participant observation, and informal and semi‑structured interviewing. Retrieved from http://www.cusag.umd.edu/documents/workingpapers/classicalethnomethods.pdf

Winkler Prins, A. M. G. A., & Souza, P. S. (2005). Surviving the city: Urban home gardens and the economy of affection in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Latin American Geography, 4(1), 107-126.

Zemach-Bersin, T. (2005). Change in motion: Tradition, modernity, and a shifting Tamang identity. Kathmandu, Nepal: Dharma Dhatu Foundation.

Published
2019-08-04
Section
Articles