Unsettling Methodologies/Decolonizing Movements

  • Craig Fortier University of Waterloo
Keywords: research methodologies, settler decolonization, social movement research, home and belonging

Abstract

As movements for social justice within settler colonial states like Canada and the United States begin to centralize Indigenous struggles for sovereignty as foundational to liberation, non-Indigenous movement participants are challenged to contend with what it means to decolonize within their respective movements. This article explores the potential to engage in decolonizing research methodologies among non-Indigenous anti-authoritarian activist groups. Based on an ethnographic and qualitative research with activists, this paper highlights three core themes emerging out of an attempt to assert a decolonizing methodological approach to research in non-Indigenous activist communities, including: identity and belonging, accountability and consent, and responsibility and appropriation.

References

Alfred, T. (2005). Wasáse: Indigenous Pathways of Action and Freedom. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Amadahy, Z. & Lawrence, B. (2009). Indigenous Peoples and Black People in Canada: Settlers or Allies? In Kempf, A. (Ed.). Breaching the Colonial Contract: Anti-Colonialism in the US and Canada. New York: Springer.

Barker, A.J. (2009). The Contemporary Reality of Canadian Imperialism: Settler Colonialism and the Hybrid Colonial State. American Indian Quarterly, 33(3), 325-351.

Bevington, D. & Dixon, C. (2005). Movement-relevant Theory: Rethinking Social Movement Scholarship and Activism. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest, 4(3), 185-208.

Cruz, M.R. (2008). What if I Just Cite Graciela? Working Toward Decolonizing Knowledge Through a Critical Ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(4), 651-658.

Davis, L. & Shpuniarsky, H.Y. (2010). The Spirit of Relationships: What We Have Learned about Indigenous/Non-Indigenous Alliances and Coalitions. In Davis, L. (Ed.), Alliances: Re/Envisioning Indigenous-non-Indigenous Relationships. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. & Smith, L.T. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dixon, C. (2012). Building ‘Another Politics’: The Contemporary Anti-Authoritarian Current in the US and Canada. Anarchist Studies, 20(1), 32-60.

Evans, M., Hole, R., Berg, L.D., Hutchinson, P. & Sookraj, D. (2009). Common Insights, Differing Methodologies: Toward a Fusion of Indigenous Methodologies, Participatory Action Research, and White Studies in an Urban Aboriginal Research Agenda. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(5), 893-910.

Fine, M., Tuck, E. & Zeller-Berkman, S. (2008). Do you Believe in Geneva? Methods and Ethics at the Global-Local Nexus. In N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln, & L.T. Smith (Eds) (2008). Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Hart, Michael Anthony (2010). Indigenous Worldviews, Knowledge, and Research: The Development of an Indigenous Research Paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work, 1(1), 1-16.

Hunt, Sarah (2013). Ontologies of Indigeneity: the politics of embodying a concept. Cultural Geographies, 0(0), 1-6.

Jafri, B. (2012). Privilege vs. Complicity: People of Colour and Settler Colonialism. Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences website. Retrieved: http://www.ideas-idees.ca/blog/privilege-vs-complicity-people-colour-and-settler-colonialism

Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Context. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Lincoln, Y.S. & González y González, E.M. (2008). The Search for Emerging Decolonizing Methodologies in Qualitative Research: Further Strategies for Liberatory and Democratic Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(5), 784-805.

Simpson, L. (2011). Dancing on Our Turtle’s Back: Stories of Nishnaabeg re-creation, resurgence and a new emergence. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring.

Simpson, A. (2014). Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life Across the Borders of Settler States. Durham: Duke University Press.

Sium, A., Desai, C. & Ritskes, E. (2012). Towards the ‘tangible unknown’: Decolonization and the Indigenous Future.

Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), I-XIII.

Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.

Smith, A. (2014). Native Studies at the Horizon of Death: Theorizing Ethnographic Entrapment and Settler Self-Reflexivity. In Simpson, A. & Smith, A (Eds.). Theorizing Native Studies. Durham: Duke University Press.

Snelgrove, C., Dhamoon, R. & Corntassel, J. (2014). Unsettling settler colonialism: The discourse and politics of settlers, and solidarity with Indigenous nations. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(2), 1-32.

Stanton, C.R. (2014). Crossing Methodological Borders: Decolonizing Community-Based Participatory Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(5), 573-583.

Unsettling Resistance (2013). Responses and Reflections. Unsettling Resistance. Retrieved: http://unsettlingresistance.wordpress.com/responses-and-reflections/

Urbanski, C. (2013). Stuck in Place: Some thoughts on Belonging. Lansing, KS: Pioneers Press.

Walia, H. (2013). Undoing Border Imperialism. Oakland: AK Press.

Walia, H. (2014). Decolonizing Together: Moving Beyond a Politics of Solidarity Toward a Practice of Decolonization. In Kino-nda-niimi Collective (Eds.). The Winter We Danced: Voices from the Past, The Future, and the Idle No More Movement. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring.

Wallace, R. (2013). Merging Fires: Grassroots Peacebuilding Between Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Peoples. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.

Section
Articles