The Helping Model of Interpersonal Communication: Viable Alternatives for Teacher Education Programs

Abstract

This article criticizes the extensive use of the helping model for interpersonal communication courses in teacher training programs. As one of several alternative models, the helping model is endorsed; as the sole model, it is criticized. While the humane goals of the helping model may be retained, it is argued that diverse means for attaining humane goals be utilized. The alternatives to the helping model discussed include the psychological perspectives of Maslow and Clarizio and Goldstein , the perspectives involving the management of human and public relations of Galleraman and Cutlip and Rapaport, and the rhetorical perspectives of Frye and Andersen and Freely. The article concludes with a reminder of the benefits associated with a limited use of the helping model for interpersonal courses in teaching programs and the burdens associated with the unlimited use of the helping model.