Synergistic Research in Medical Education: Some Philosophical Reflections

  • Richard B Hovey McGill University
  • Charo Rodríguez McGill University
  • Steven Jordan McGill University
  • Angela Morck Independent Researcher
Keywords: Synergistic research, medical education, philosophy of science, hermeneutic wager, person-centred care, research methods.

Abstract

In this paper, we present and discuss the “synergistic research approach,” from quantitative and qualitative through mixed methods, as a term that refers to an academic endeavour in which researchers are not only committed to comprehensiveness and rigor, but also – and importantly – to excellence in peer processes that further enhance knowledge generation by emphasizing the philosophical underpinnings thereof. We outline the hermeneutic wager, which provides the philosophical grounds for synergistic research, and explain the reasons why we consider this perspective to be of particular interest in the health profession education field of inquiry.

 

 

Author Biographies

Richard B Hovey, McGill University

Dr. Hovey is an Associate Professor of Oral Health and Society, and Director of Faculty Development at the Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University.

Chair, McGill Group on Transformational Learning in Health (TLH)

Charo Rodríguez, McGill University

Dr. Rodríguez is an Associate Professor of Family Medicine, and Director of the Family Medicine Educational Research Group (FMER), Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University. She is also FRQ-S Senior Research Scholar.

McGill Group on Transformational Learning in Health (TLH)

Steven Jordan, McGill University

Dr. Jordan is an Associate Professor and Chair, Integrated Studies in Education, Department of Education, Faculty of Education, McGill University.

McGill Group on Transformational Learning in Health (TLH)

References

Bergman, M.M. (2011). The good, the bad, and the ugly in mixed methods research and design. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5, 271-275.

Creswell, J.W., & Garrett, A.L. (2008). The “movement” of mixed methods research and the role of educators. South African Journal of Education, 28, 321-333.

Creswell, J.W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. (In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 269-281). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Davey, N. (2006). Unquiet understanding: Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Denzin N.K. (2010). Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 419. doi: 10.1177/1077800410364608

Denzin, N.K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6, 80-88.

Gadamer, H-G. (2001). Gadamer in conversation: Reflections and commentary (R. E. Palmer, Ed. & Trans). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Gadamer, H-G. (1999). Praise of theory: Speeches and Essays. (C. Dawson, Trans.) New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Gadamer, H-G. (1992). Hans-Georg Gadamer on education, poetry, and history: Applied hermeneutics. (D. Misgeld & G. Nicholson, Trans.) Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Gadamer, H-G. (1960/1989). Truth and method (2nd ed.; J. Weinsheimer & D.G. Marshall, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.

Giddings, L.S. (2006). Mixed-methods research – Positivism dressed in drag? Journal of Research in Nursing, 11, 195-203.

Hovey, R., & Craig, R. (2011). Understanding the relational aspects of learning with, from, and about the other. Nursing Philosophy, 12(4), 262-270.

Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Research, 33, 14-26.

Kearney, R. (2011). Anatheism: Returning to God after God. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Lavelle, E., Vuk, J., & Barber, C. (2013). Twelve tips for getting started using mixed methods in medical education research. Medical Teacher, 35, 272-276.

Lund, D. E., Panayotidis, E. L., Smits, H., & Towers, J. (2012). Provoking conversation on inquiry in teacher education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Morgan, D.L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 48-76.

Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J.W. (2007). The new era of mixed methods. [Editorial]. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 3-7.

Tavakol, M., & Sandars, J. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE Guide No 90: Part I. Medical Teacher, 36, 746-756.

Symonds, J., & Gorard, S. (2010). Death of mixed methods? Or the rebirth of research as a craft. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23, 121-136.

Synergy (n.d.) In Online etymology dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=synergy

Treanor, B. (2010). The anatheistic wager: Faith after faith. Religion and the Arts, 14(1), 547-560.

Vattimo, G. (2011). Farewell to truth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations (4th ed.; G.E.M. Anscombe, M.S. Hacker, & J. Schulte, Trans.). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Published
2016-06-07
Issue
Section
Articles