Putting Theory of Change into Use in Complex Settings

Authors

  • Boru Douthwaite Boru-Consult
  • Farid Ahmad
  • Ghulam-Muhammad Shah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.43168

Keywords:

Accountability, learning, results-based management, participation, impact pathways, adaptive management

Abstract

This paper argues that theory of change can be used to help stakeholders in agricultural research for development projects collectively agree on problems and visions of success. This helps them feel greater ownership for their project, motivation to achieve outcomes, and understanding of how to do so. However, the dynamic is damaged if projects are pushed to be too specific too early about the outcomes for which they are to be held accountable. This is most likely to happen when system response to project intervention is uncertain, as opposed to projects that work with existing pathways and partnerships where the role of research is well established.

Author Biographies

Boru Douthwaite, Boru-Consult

Boru Douthwaite is an independent researcher and evaluator based in Ireland and former principal scientist and impact and innovation director in the CGIAR

Farid Ahmad

Farid Ahmad is head of the Strategic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit at ICIMOD in Nepal

Ghulam-Muhammad Shah

Ghulam-Muhammad Shah is an impact, monitoring and evaluation specialist at ICIMOD in Nepal

Downloads

Published

2020-05-28

Issue

Vol. 35 No. 1 (2020): Spring 2020 / printemps 2020

Section

Articles- English

License

The Canadian Evaluation Society (CES) owns the copyright to all material published in the Journal. Authors are informed of this policy prior to submission of the final copy for publication. Requests for permission to reprint, post or distribute copies of articles (electronic or hardcopy) come to the Editor-in-chief, who has the authority to decide on behalf of CES.