Distrust, Relationality and Equity: A Response to Lacourt Suárez’s Trust, Learning and Social Growth Continuum
Keywords:
trust, school leadership, relationality, equityAbstract
My encounter with Lacourt Suárez’s (2026) Positive Leadership and its Impact on Improving the Climate in Chilean Schools. A Comparison between Teachers and School Leaders (Lacourt Suárez, 2026), compelled me to raise considerations for the role of trust in leadership and implications for effective teaching, successful students, and the achievement of social democratic goals. I wondered about how this equation manifests in contexts characterized by power differentials and intergenerational distrust. By reframing from a linear cause-and-effect to a cycle of negotiating trust and its implications for effectiveness, learning, and equity, we can not only recognize and encounter distrust but also embrace it in dissonance. Considering distrust as an attribute of calibrating relationships informed by social conditions that lie beneath the veneer of the certainty of trust, school leaders can discover the liberating discourse that results from interrogating trust and embracing the complexity and conditions that instigate distrust. Accepting these conditions as norms in building relationships based on authenticity has the potential to disrupt lingering power relationships in schools and society.
References
Bassil-Morozow, H. V. (2015). The trickster and the system: Identity and agency in contemporary society. Routledge.
Bird, C. P., Lee, T. S., & Lopez, N. (2013). Leadership and accountability in American Indian education: Voices from New Mexico. American Journal of Education, 119, 539-564. https://doi.org/10.1086/670965
Bird, J. J., Wang, C., Watson, J. R., & Murray, L. (2009). Relationships among principal authentic leadership and teacher trust and engagement levels. Journal of School Leadership, 19(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460901900202
Buckmiller, T. (2015). Seagulls and eagles: Indian principals’ perceptions of school leadership for Indian students. Journal of School Leadership, 25(5), 876–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500504
Cockrum-Murphy, L. (2010). Stronger at the broken places: Heuristic inquiry growing up in chaos and the journey from suffering to self-actualization. Lambert Academic Publishing.
Cunliffe, A. L., & Eriksen, M. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64(11), 1425-1449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711418388
Henderson, D., Carjuzaa, J., & Ruff, W. G. (2015). Reconciling leadership paradigms: Authenticity as practiced by American Indian school leaders. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 17(1), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v17i1.940
Jones, K. (2019). Trust, distrust, and affective looping. Philosophical Studies, 176(4), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1221-5
Lacourt Suárez, L. (2026). Positive leadership and its impact on improving the climate in Chilean schools. A cross look between teachers and school leaders. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, (208), 123-135.
Lim, L. (2019). Positive school leadership: Building capacity and strengthening relationships. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1631857
Louis, K. S., & Murphy, J. (2017). Trust, caring and organizational learning: the leader’s role. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2016-0077
Lowe, K., Harrison, N., Tennent, C., Guenther, J., Vass, G., & Moodie, N. (2019). Factors affecting the development of school and Indigenous community engagement: A systematic review. Australian Educational Researcher, 46(2), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00314-6
Lu, H., Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., & Tan, L. (2021). Does distrust motivate or discourage employees? The double-edged sword of feeling ability-distrusted by supervisors. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(12), 1376–1392. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.01376
Massari, G. F., Giannoccaro, I., & Carbone, G. (2019). Are distrust relationships beneficial for group performance? The influence of the scope of distrust on the emergence of collective intelligence. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.005
Schul, Y., Mayo, R., & Burnstein, E. (2008). The value of distrust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.003
Strega, S. (2005). The view from the poststructural margins: Epistemology and methodology reconsidered. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, Indigenous, & anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 199-235). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Szakolczai, Á. (2022). Post-truth society: A political anthropology of trickster logic. Routledge.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (1998). Trust in schools: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239810211518
Zoller, H. & Fairhurst, G.T. (2007). Resistance leadership: The overlooked potential in critical organization and leadership studies. Human Relations, 60(9), 1331-1360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707082850
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gordon Martell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
