Towards a Conscious Integration of EDI Values on Canadian Campuses: A Case Study Analysis
Mots-clés :
equity, diversity, inclusion, policies, higher education, championsRésumé
Campuses are focusing on Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) initiatives and programs as a response to urgent calls for higher education institutions to exemplify these principles. This study focused on determining the current environment for embedding EDI principles to identify next steps in galvanizing efforts in this work. This qualitative multi-case study had two phases. In the first phase, we conducted an environmental scan of the websites of the 15 research-intensive universities in Canada (U15) to determine how EDI efforts were included in any publicly available documents and on the websites. In the second phase, we conducted semi-structured interviews with members of an EDI Champions committee at one campus to explore how the EDI commitments were being actualized on that campus. Participants confirmed that work was ongoing but that determining a shared understanding of EDI, articulating a strategy for implementation, and promoting EDI efforts on campus faced many challenges including creating understanding and commitment across campus to further the EDI strategies. Campuses need a well-articulated strategy complete with processes and targets to inform campus members about EDI, determine ways to support action, and articulate ways to measure progress against EDI goals.
Téléchargements
Références
Abbot, D., Bikfalvi, A., Bleske-Rechek, A. L., Bodmer, W., Boghossian, P., Carvalho, C. M., ... & West, J. D. (2023). In defense of merit in science. Journal of Controversial Ideas, 3(1) 1-26. https://doi.org/10.35995/jci03010001.
Aldrich, M. C., Cust, A. E., & Raynes-Greenow, C. (2019). Gender equity in epidemiology: A policy brief. Annals of Epidemiology, 35, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.03.010
Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2016). Governance of higher education: Global perspectives, theories, and practices. Routledge.
Berry, M., Inge, B. A., Gross, J. P., Colston, J., & Bowers, A. M. (2018). Planning for diversity: The inclusion of diversity goals in postsecondary statewide strategic plan. Higher Education Politics & Economics, 4(1), 262-280.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/13620-004
Burrell Storms, S. (2012). Preparing students for social action in a social justice education course: What works? Equity & Excellence in Education 45(4), 547-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2012.719424
Caldicott, C. V., & Faber-Langendoen, K. (2005). Deception, discrimination, and fear of reprisal: Lessons in ethics from third-year medical students. Academic Medicine, 80(9), 866-873.
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10, 807-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
Chan, A. S. (2005). Policy discourses and changing practice: Diversity and the university-college. Higher Education, 50(1), 129–157.
Choo, C. W. (2008). Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational knowing. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 2(1), 1-27. http://aisel.aisnet.org/sprouts_all/18
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2016). Why diversity programs fail and what works better. Harvard Business Review, 94(7-8), 52-60. https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail
Feder, T. (2024). State anti-DEI laws sow uncertainty in public colleges and universities. Physics Today, 77(4), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1063/pt.xkpj.fvsv
Fuentes, R., Chanthongthi, L., & Rios, F. (2010). Teaching and learning social justice as an ‘Intellectual Community’ requirement: Pedagogical opportunities and student understandings. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(3), 357-374.
Government of Canada. (n.d.). Guide to addressing equity, diversity and inclusion considerations in partnership grant applications. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. https://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/apply-demande/guides/partnership_edi_guide-partenariats_guide_edi-eng.aspx
Green, D. O. N. (2018). Integrating equity, diversity, and inclusion into the DNA of public universities: Reflections of a chief diversity officer. In S. Thompson (Ed.), Campus diversity triumphs, diversity in higher education (Vol. 20, pp. 185–199). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-364420180000020016
Gurin, P., Nagda, B. R. A., & Lopez, G. E. (2004). The benefits of diversity in education for democratic citizenship. Journal of Social Issues, 60(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00097.x
Hardy Cox, D., & Strange, C. C. (2010). Foundations of student services in Canadian higher education. In D. Hardy Cox & C. C. Strange (Eds.), Achieving student success: Effective student services in Canadian higher education (pp. 5-17). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Harris, J. C., Barone, R. P., & Davis, L. P. (2015). Who benefits? A critical race analysis of the (d) evolving language of inclusion in higher education. Thought & Action, 31(2), 21-38.
Hartwell, E. E., Cole, K., Donovan, S. K., Greene, R. L., Storms, S. L. B., & Williams, T. (2017). Breaking down silos: Teaching for equity, diversity, and inclusion across disciplines. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 39, 143-162.
Hoffman, G. D., & Mitchell, T. D. (2016). Making diversity “everyone’s business”: A discourse analysis of institutional responses to student activism for equity and inclusion. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000037
Hoppe, T. A., Litovitz, A., Willis, K. A., Meseroll, R. A., Perkins, M. J., Hutchins, B. I., Davis, A. F., Lauer, M. S., Valantine, H. A., Anderson, J. M., & Santangelo, G. M. (2019). Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. Science Advances, 5(10), https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw7238
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles & policy subsystems (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Iverson, S. V. (2012). Multicultural competence for doing social justice: Expanding our awareness, knowledge, and skills. Journal of Critical Thought and Praxis 1(1), 62-87.
Krupnick, M. (2018, October 2). Divided we learn: After colleges promised to increase it, hiring of Black faculty declined. The Hechinger Report. https://hechingerreport.org/after-colleges-promised-to-increase-it-hiring-of-black-faculty-declined/
LePeau, L. A., Hurtado, S. S., & Davis, R. J. (2018). What institutional websites reveal about diversity-related partnerships between academic and student affairs. Innovative Higher Education, 43(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9412-0
Loden, M., & Rosener, J. B. (1991). Workforce America: Managing employee diversity as a vital resource. McGraw-Hill.
MacKenzie, M., Sensoy, Ö., Fuji Johnson, G., Sinclair, N., & Weldon, L. (2023). How universities gaslight EDI&I initiatives: Mapping institutional resistance to structural change. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 19(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2023v19n1a1303
McMaster University. (2020). Policy on recruitment and selection of faculty members. Retrieved from https://secretariat.mcmaster.ca/app/uploads/SPS-A1-Recruitment-and- Selection-of-Faculty-Members.pdf
Medjuck, A. (2014, August 20). Causes of abuse, why it goes unreported. The National Benefit Authority. https://www.thenba.ca/disability-blog/causes-abuse-goes-unreported/#:~:text=Fear%3A%20People%20might%20fear%20reporting,as%20a%20result%20of%20reporting.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Morphew, C. C., & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778934.
Multiculturalism, British Columbia (2000). Framework for diversity: Multiculturalism, human rights, employment equity and social justice. Multiculturalism BC.
Pidgeon, M. (2016). More than a checklist: Meaningful Indigenous inclusion in higher education. Social Inclusion, 4(1), 77-91
Pitts, D. W., & Recascino Wise, L. (2010). Workforce diversity in the new millennium: Prospects for research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(1), 44-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X09351823
Queen’s University. (2001, April 19). Educational equity policy statement. https://www.queensu.ca/secretariat/policies/senate/educational-equity-policy/educational-equity-policy-statement
Queen’s University. (2011, January 20). Safe Disclosure Reporting and Investigation Policy and Procedures. Queen’s University Secretariat. https://www.queensu.ca/risk/sites/rsswww/files/uploaded_files/RSS/Safe_Disclosure_Policy.pdf
Saichaie, K., & Morphew, C. C. (2014). What college and university websites reveal about the purposes of higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 499-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777338.
Salmi, J., & D’Addio, A. (2021). Policies for achieving inclusion in higher education. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 47-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1835529
Scott, C. (2020). Managing and regulating commitments to equality, diversity and inclusion in higher education. Irish Educational Studies, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2020.1754879.
Sursock, A. (2018). A transatlantic view on openness, democracy and engagement. European University Association.
Tamtik, M., & Guenter, M. (2019). Policy analysis of equity, diversity and inclusion strategies in Canadian universities – How far have we come? Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 49(3), 41 – 56. https://doi.org/10.7202/1066634ar
Universities Canada. (2019, November 4). Equity, diversity and inclusion at Canadian universities: Report on the 2019 national survey. https://univcan.ca/publication/equity-diversity-and-inclusion-at-canadian-universities-report-on-the-2019-survey
University of British Columbia. (2019). Employment advertising policy. https://universitycounsel.ubc.ca/files/2024/12/Employment-Advertising-Policy_HR11.pdf
University of Calgary. (2005). Aboriginal student admissions policy. https://www.ucalgary.ca/legal-services/sites/default/files/teams/1/Policies-Aboriginal-Student-Admissions-Policy.pdf
University of Calgary. (2015). Procedure for protected disclosure. https://www.ucalgary.ca/legal-services/sites/default/files/teams/1/Policies-Protected-Disclosure-Procedure.pdf
University of Saskatchewan. (2012, May 1). Policy on admission to degree programs. https://policies.usask.ca/policies/academic-affairs/policy-on-admission-to-degree-programs.php
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
West, M. A., Hwang, S., Maier, R. V., Ahuja, N., Angelos, P., Bass, B. L., ... & Wren, S. M. (2018). Ensuring equity, diversity, and inclusion in academic surgery: An American Surgical Association white paper. Annals of Surgery, 268(3), 403-407.
Williams, D. A., & Clowney, C. (2007). Strategic planning for diversity and organizational change. Effective Practices for Academic Leaders, 2(3), 1-16.
Wilson, J. L., Meyer, K. A., & McNeal, L. (2012). Mission and diversity statements: What they do and do not say. Innovative Higher Education, 37(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9194-8.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Vicki Squires, Alexander Gavu, Hannah Moore, Rohan Gopakumar 2025
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Les auteurs dont les articles sont publiés dans la Revue acceptent les conditions suivantes :
-
Les auteurs conservent leurs droits d’auteur et accordent à la Revue un droit de première publication, les travaux faisant en même temps l’objet d’une licence d'attribution Creative Commons autorisant d’autres parties à diffuser les travaux, sous réserve d’une mention de l’auteur et de la publication initiale dans la RCAPE.
-
Il est permis aux auteurs de conclure des ententes contractuelles distinctes additionnelles en vue de la diffusion non exclusive de la version de travaux parus dans la Revue (p. ex. pour enregistrement dans un dépôt institutionnel ou inclusion dans un ouvrage), à la condition d’inclure une mention de la parution initiale dans la RCAPE.
-
Les auteurs sont autorisés et encouragés à faire paraître leurs travaux en ligne (p. ex. dans des dépôts institutionnels ou dans leurs sites Web) avant et pendant le processus d’évaluation, ce qui peut déboucher sur des échanges productifs et favoriser et faire que les travaux publiés soient cités plus tôt et plus fréquemment
