Who Pays the Corporate Tax? Insights from the Literature and Evidence for Canadian Provinces

Auteurs-es

  • Kenneth J. McKenzie University of Calgary
  • Ergete Ferede Grant MacEwan University

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v10i0.42621

Résumé

Who bears the burden, or incidence, of the corporate income tax (CIT)? This is an important, if not somewhat contentious, policy issue. In this paper we provide a discussion of the existing research on the question, viewing it through a Canadian policy lens. We also use some new results from a companion technical paper, which undertakes one of the few empirical investigations of the issue using Canadian data, to discuss the implications of increases in corporate taxes for wages in Canadian provinces.
While it is clear that people, not corporate entities, ultimately bear the burden of corporate taxes, a key question is which people? The answer to this question has important implications for the equity, or fairness, of the tax system. Much of the recent focus in policy discussions concerns the allocation of the burden of the CIT between owners of capital and labour. Since income from capital tends to be concentrated with wealthier individuals, if the burden of the CIT falls mostly on the owners of capital, it increases the progressivity of the tax system. On the other hand, if the tax is borne mostly by labour through lower wages, the CIT is less progressive.
Much of the research into the incidence of the CIT has employed theoretical simulation models. Early models of this type, which were based on a closed economy with fixed supplies of labour and capital, suggested that most of the burden of the CIT would be borne by the owners of capital throughout the economy, and not just the shareholders of firms in the corporate sector. Subsequent extensions of those models into a small open economy setting, 

where capital and goods are highly mobile between jurisdictions (countries, provinces), predict that most of the burden of the CIT will be borne by other inputs that are relatively inelastic in supply, such as labour. These small open economy models are particularly relevant for Canada. Viewing the results of these models through a Canadian lens, we conclude that there is good reason to expect that much of the burden of corporate taxes in Canada, particularly those levied by provincial governments, will fall on labour through lower wages.
While useful, the predictions of these simulation models should be viewed with caution, largely because of the sensitivity of the results to the underlying assumptions. A nascent empirical literature has emerged that provides econometric-based estimates of the distribution of the burden of corporate taxes. While this research is relatively new, our reading is that the evidence is mounting that corporate taxes are indeed borne to a significant extent by labour through lower wages. However, there is very little empirical work done in an explicitly Canadian context.
In a companion technical paper we employ Canadian data to examine the impact of provincial corporate taxes on wages. Our results suggest that, consistent with the predictions of the open economy simulation models, provincial corporate taxes adversely affect the capital/labour ratio, which lowers the productivity of labour which, in turn, lowers wages. Accounting for the shrinkage in the corporate tax base in response to an increase in the tax rate, we calculate that for every $1 in extra tax revenue generated by an increase in the provincial CIT rate, the associated long-run decrease in aggregate wages ranges from $1.52 for Alberta to $3.85 for Prince Edward Island. Applying our estimates to the recent 2 percentage point increase in the CIT rate in Alberta we calculate that labour earnings for an average two-earner household will decline by the equivalent of approximately $830 per year, which amounts to a $1.12 billion reduction in aggregate labour earnings for the province. By way of comparison, other research has estimated the impact of the recently imposed carbon tax in Alberta – the subject of considerable scrutiny – to be approximately $525 per household.

Références

Arulampalam, Wiji, Michael P. Devereux, and Giorgia Maffini. 2012. “The Direct Incidence of the Corporate Income Tax on Wages.” European Economic Review 56: 1038-1054.

Atkinson, Anthony, and Joseph Stiglitz. 1980. Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Auerbach, Alan J. 2005. “Who Bears the Corporate Tax? A Review of What We Know.” NBER Working Paper no. 11686.

Baldwin, John R., Anthony Fisher, Wulong Gu, Frank Lee, and Benoit Robidoux. 2008. “Capital Intensity in Canada and the United States, 1987 to 2003.” The Canadian Productivity Review, Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 15-206-X -no. 018.

Bayoumi, Tamim, and Michael W. Klein. 1997. “A Provincial View of Capital Mobility.” International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 44(4): 534-556.

Bazel, Phil, and Jack M. Mintz. 2016. “2015 Tax Competitiveness Report: Canada is Losing Its Attractiveness.” SPP Research Paper vol. 9(47). The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary.

Carroll, Robert. 2009. “Corporate Tax and Wages: Evidence from the 50 States.” Tax Foundation Working Paper no. 8.

Chen, Duanjie, and Jack Mintz. 2006. “Federal/Provincial Combined Marginal Effective Tax Rates on Capital 1997-2006.” Supplementary information for Business Tax Reform: More Progress Needed. C.D. Howe Institute e-brief.

Chen, Duanjie, and Jack M. Mintz. 2012. “2012 Annual Global Tax Competitiveness Ranking — a Canadian Good News Story.” SPP Research Paper, vol. 5(28). The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary.

Chen, Duanjie, and Jack M. Mintz. 2015. “The 2014 Global Tax Competitiveness Report: A Proposed Business Tax Reform Agenda.” SPP Research Paper 8(4). The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary.

Clausing, Kimberly A. 2012. “In Search of Corporate Tax Incidence.” Tax Law Review 65: 433-472. Clausing, Kimberly A. 2013. “Who Pays the Corporate Tax in a Global Economy?” National Tax Journal 66(1): 151-184.

Dahlby, Bev. 2000. “Tax Coordination and Tax Externalities,” in “Recent Developments in Tax Coordination: A Panel Discussion by Bev Dahlby, Robert Henry, Michael Keen, and David E. Wildasin.” Canadian Tax Journal 48(2): 399-409.

Dahlby, Bev and Ergete Ferede. 2012. “The Effects of Tax Rate Changes on Tax Bases and the Marginal Cost of Public Funds for Canadian Provincial Governments.” International Tax and Public Finance 19: 844-883.

Desai, M., Fritz Foley, and James Hines.2007. “Labor and Capital Shares of the Corporate Tax Burden: International Evidence.” Available at http://www.people.hbs.edu/mdesai/publications.

Dwenger, Nadja, Pia Rattenhuber, and Viktor Steiner. 2011. “Sharing the Burden: Empirical Evidence on Corporate Tax Incidence.” School of Business & Economics Discussion Paper: Economics, no. 2011/19.

Ebrahimi, P., and F. Vaillancourt. 2016. “The Effect of Corporate Income and Payroll Taxes on the Wages of Canadian Workers.” Vancouver: Fraser Institute.

Feldstein, Martin, and Charles Horioka. 1980. “Domestic Savings and International Capital Flows.” Economic Journal 90: 314-329.

Felix, R. Alison. 2007. “Passing the Burden: Corporate Tax Incidence in Open Economies.” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Working Paper.

Felix, R. Alison. 2009. “Do State Corporate Income Taxes Reduce Wages?” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Working Paper.

Felix, R. Alison, and James R. Hines. 2009. “Corporate Taxes and Union Wages in the United States.” NBER Working Paper no. 15263.

Frankel, Jeffrey A. 1992. “Measuring International Capital Mobility: A Review.” American Economic Review 82(2): 197-202.

Fuest, Clemens, Andreas Peichl, and Sebastian Siegloch. 2015. “Do Higher Corporate Taxes Reduce Wages?” IZA Discussion Paper no. 9606. Bonn, Germany: The Institute for the Study of Labour.

Gouëdard, P., and F. Vaillancourt. 2011. “Taux d’investissement privé et épargne des ménages des provinces candiennes, 1990-2008; y-a-t-il une relation?” Project Report 2011RP-14, Cirano.

Gravelle, Jane G., and Thomas Hungerford. 2008. “Corporate Tax Reform: Should We Really Believe the Research?” Tax Notes no. 419: 429.

Gravelle, Jane G., and Laurence J. Kotlikoff. 1993. “Corporate Tax Incidence and Inefficiency when Corporate and Non-corporate Goods are Close Substitutes.” Economic Inquiry 31(4): 501-516.

Gravelle, Jane G., and Kent A. Smetters. 2006. “Does the Open Economy Assumption Really Mean that Labor Bears the Burden of a Capital Income Tax?” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy 6(1), article 3.

Gravelle, Jennifer. 2013. “Corporate Tax Incidence: Review of General Equilibrium Estimates and Analysis.” National Tax Journal 66(1): 184-214.

Gruber, Jonathan. 2010. Public Finance and Public Policy, 3rd ed. New York: Worth Publishers.

Grubert, Harry, and John Mutti.1985. “The Taxation of Capital Income in an Open Economy: The Importance of Resident-Nonresident Tax Treatment.” Journal of Public Economics 27(3): 291-309.

Harberger, Arnold C. 1962. “The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax.” Journal of Political Economy 70(3): 215-240.

Harberger, Arnold C. 1995. “The ABCs of Corporation Tax Incidence: Insights into the Open-Economy Case,” in Tax Policy and Economic Growth. Washington, D.C.: American Council for Capital Formation.

Harberger, Arnold C. 2008. “Corporate Tax Incidence: Reflections on what is Known, Unknown and Unknowable,” edited by John W. Diamond and George R. Zodrow, in Fundamental Tax Reform: Issues, Choices, and Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 283-308.

Hassett, Kevin A., and Aparna Mathur. 2006. “Taxes and Wages.” American Enterprise Institute Working Paper no. 128, June.

Hassett, Kevin A., and Aparna Mathur. 2015. “A Spatial Model of Corporate Tax Incidence.” Applied Economics 47(13): 1350-1365.

Helliwell, John F., and Ross McKitrick. 1999. “Comparing Capital Mobility Across Provincial and National Borders.” Canadian Journal of Economics 32(5): 1164-1173.

Leontief, Wassily W. 1985. “What It Takes to Preserve Social Equity Amid Dynamic Free Enterprise.” New York Times, Feb. 1, 1985.

Liu, Li, and Rosanne Altshuler. 2013. “Measuring the Burden of the Corporate Income Tax under Imperfect Competition.” National Tax Journal 66(1): 215-238.

McKenzie, Kenneth J. 2015. “The Corporate Income Tax in Canada: Past, Present and Future.” Canadian Tax Journal 63(4): 1011-1026. McKenzie,

Kenneth J., and Ergete Ferede. 2017. “The Incidence of the Corporate Income Tax on Wages: Evidence from Canadian Provinces,” SPP Technical Paper, The School of Public Policy, the University of Calgary.

Parsons, M. 2008. “The Effect of Corporate Taxes on Canadian Investment: An Empirical Investigation.” Working Paper 2008-01. Ottawa: Department of Finance.

Pelgrin, Florian, and Sebastian Pelgrin. 2008. “International Capital Mobility: What do National Saving-Investment Dynamics Tell Us?” Journal of International Money and Finance 27: 332-344.

Randolph, William C. 2006. “International Burdens of the Corporate Income Tax.” CBO Working Paper no. 2006-09. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Budget Office.

Riedel, Nadine. 2011. “Taxing Multinationals under Union Wage Bargaining.” International Tax and Public Finance 18(4): 399-421.

Vanguard. 2014a. “Global Equities: Balancing Home Bias and Diversification — A Canadian Investor’s Perspective.” Vanguard Research, July 2014. Available at https://www. vanguardcanada.ca/documents/global-equities-tlor.pdf)

Vanguard. 2014b. “Global Equities: Balancing Home Bias and Diversification.” Vanguard Research, February 2014. Available at https://www.vanguard.com/pdf/ISGGEB.pdf)

Winter, Jennifer and Sarah Dobson. 2016. “Who is Getting a Carbon Tax Rebate?” SPP Communique Vol. 8, Issue 10, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary.

Wolfson, Michael, Neil Brooks, and Mike Veall. 2014. “Piercing the Veil: Private Corporations and the Income of the Affluent.” Mimeo. Available at https://uwaterloo.ca/ school-of-accounting-and-finance/sites/ca./school-of-accounting-and-finance/files/uploads/ files/wolfson-brooks-veall-_incomes_of_affluent.pdf

Wolfson, Michael, and Scott Legree. 2015. “Policy Forum: Private Companies, Professionals, and Income Splitting — Recent Canadian Experience.” Canadian Tax Journal 63(3): 717-737.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2017-04-20

Numéro

Rubrique

Research Papers