Improving the Acquisition Process in Canada
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v8i0.42515Résumé
Flaws in Canada’s military procurement processes are a perennial burden on both government and industry. The release of the Defence Procurement Strategy this year signified Ottawa’s inclination toward change. Among other things, the DPS promises to consult industry and outside experts earlier, create a specialist acquisition branch within Public Works & Government Services Canada and use military equipment projects to generate domestic jobs and growth. The DPS is a good start, but more focused solutions are required. The defence market has too few buyers and sellers to be truly competitive — especially in Canada. Government must share information with industry at every step, clearly and comprehensively, if Canadian firms are to win contracts fairly, keeping the economic benefits at home. A sweeping, end-to-end review of procurement is also required to identify current practices that work and others in need of improvement. Preliminary cost estimates can’t be too firm because prices shift as projects develop, and all too often, capabilities are downgraded in response. Government has to be transparent about how far into the future lifecycle costs run, or stop trying to establish them altogether, so as to avoid the consequences of embarrassingly unrealistic assessments. A separate procurement organization should also be established outside of the DND and PWGSC to make better use of the people with the skills to run complex military procurement projects. Canada’s military procurement system is not as broken as its most strident critics allege, but it is coming under increasing fiscal and policy pressures. This brief fleshes out the issues that would-be reformers should take into account and surveys procedures among allied nations to offer a roadmap for change.Références
Australian Department of Defence. Public Capability Plan.
Byers, Michael. “Canada’s military procurement like a Monty Python movie,” Toronto Star Opinion Piece. 9 October 2013. Available at http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2013/10/09/canadas_ military_procurement_like_a_monty_python_movie.html#.
Canadian Association of Defence Security Industries. CADSI Policy Priorities 2011. Ottawa: CADSI, 2011. Available at https://www.defenceandsecurity.ca/UserFiles/File/2011/CADSIPolicyPriorities11.pdf.
Canadian Association of Defence and Security Industries. Canada’s Defence Industry: A Vital Partner Supporting Canada’s Economic and National Interests. Ottawa: CADSI, December 2009.
Department of National Defence. 1994 Defence White Paper. Ottawa: Canada Communications Group, 1994.
Department of National Defence. Canada First Defence Strategy Ottawa: DND, 2008.
Department of National Defence, Chief of Review Services. Internal Audit of Joint Support Ship (JSS) Project. Ottawa: DND November 2011.
Emerson, The Honourable David. Beyond the Horizon: Canada’s Interests and Future and Aerospace Volume 1. Aerospace Review Mandated by the Government of Canada. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, November, 2012.
Fetterly, Ross. Defence Procurement Reform in Other Nations. The Claxton Papers 10. Kingston: School of Policy Studies Queen’s University, 2009.
Gansler, Jacques. The Defense Industry. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1980. Gray, Bernard. Review of Acquisition for the Secretary of State for Defence: An Independent Report by Bernard Gray. London: Bernard Gray, October 2009.
Jenkins, Tom. Canada First: Leveraging Defence Procurement Through Key Industrial Capabilities Report of the Special Advisor to the Minister of Public Works and Government Services. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, February 2013.
Kirkpatrick, David L. I. “The Rising Unit Cost of Defence Equipment-The Reasons and the Results.” Defence and Peace Economics 6, no. 3(1996): 263-288.
Kirkpatrick, David L. I. “Trends in the Costs of Weapon Systems and the Consequences.” Defence and Peace Economics 15, no. 3, (June 2004): 259–273.
McParland, Kelly. “Demanding cost certainty for new Navy vessels is an exercise in fantasy.” National Post 14 November 2013. Available at http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2013/11/14/kelly-mcparlanddemanding-cost-certainty-for-new-navy-vessels-is-an-exercise-in-fantasy.
Office of the Auditor General. Report of the Auditor General of Canada Chapter 3 National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy Ottawa: PWGSC Fall 2013; available at http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/ internet/docs/parl_oag_201311_03_e.pdf.
Peck, Merton and Frederic Scherer. The Weapons Acquisition Process: An Economic Analysis. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School, 1962.
Public Works and Government Services Canada, Leveraging Defence Procurement to Create Jobs and Benefit the Economy Press Release February 5, 2014 (Ottawa; PWGSC, 2014); available at http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?mthd=tp&crtr.page=1&nid=813789&crtr.tp1D=1.
Pugh, P.G. “The Procurement Nexus.” Defence Economics 4 (1993): 179-194;
Scherer, Frederic. The Weapons Acquisition Process: Economic Incentives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1964.
Wylie, Robert. “Defence Industry and Innovation Policy’ Security Challenges 9, no 2. (2013): 107-119.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
The following is the copyright statement of SPPP.
Copyright © <Author name> <year>. This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows non-commercial sharing and redistribution so long as the original author and publisher are credited.
Publication Copyright and Licensing
The following guidelines and information, provided in six sections, are intended for authors (the “Author”) who are invited to write a paper (the “Work”) for The School of Public Policy Publications (the “Publisher”). The rights and responsibilities conveyed in the SPP Author Agreement will only apply once your paper is accepted for publication. At that point in the publication process, you will be asked to download the form and return a signed copy via e-mail to spppublications@ucalgary.ca. Please review the below information to ensure agreement with SPPP policies.
Section 1: Author’s Grant of Rights
In consideration of the Publisher’s agreeing to publish the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications, the Author hereby grants to the Publisher the following:
1.1 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format;
1.2 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials related to the Work; and
1.3 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Section 2: Prior Publication & Publication by Others
2.1 The Author agrees not to publish the Work, or authorize any third party to publish the Work, either in print or electronically, prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher.
2.2 The Author agrees not to publish the Work in any publication outlet which is substantially similar to The School of Public Policy Publications for a period of six (6) months after publication of the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications. Substantially similar is defined as a non-subscription, open-access publication outlet with a similar mandate/vision and intended audience.
2.3 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to contact The School of Public Policy Publications to inform them of the subsequent publication.
2.4 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to make reasonable efforts to ensure that any such additional publication cites the publication in The School of Public Policy Publications by author, title, and publisher, through a tagline, author bibliography, or similar means. A sample acknowledgement would be:
“Reprinted with permission from the author. Originally published in the The School of Public Policy Publications, http://www.policyschool.ca/publications/.”
Section 3: Editing and Formatting
The Author authorizes the Publisher to edit the Work and to make such modifications as are technically necessary or desirable to exercise the rights in Section 1 in differing media and formats. The Publisher will make no material modification to the content of the Work without the Author’s consent.
Section 4: Author’s Ownership of Copyright and Reservation of Rights
4.1 Nothing in this agreement constitutes a transfer of the copyright by the Author, and the copyright in the Work is subject to the rights granted by this agreement.
4.2 The Author retains the following rights, including but not limited to, the right:
4.2.1 To reproduce and distribute the Work, and to authorize others to reproduce and distribute the Work, in any format;
4.2.2 To post a version of the Work in an institutional repository or the Author’s personal or departmental web page so long as The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.2.3 To include the Work, in whole or in part, in another work, subject to Section 2 above and provided that The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.3 The Editors and Editorial Board of The School of Public Policy Publications requires authors to publish the Work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the Work for noncommercial purposes, and ensures the Author is credited for the original creation. This onward licensing is subject to section 2.4 of this agreement, which further ensures that the original publisher is credited.
Section 5: Author’s Warranties and Undertakings
The Author warrants that:
5.1 The Author is the sole author of the Work, or if a joint author, the Author has identified within the Work the other authors, and holds the copyright, either solely or jointly, and has the power to convey the rights granted in this agreement.
5.2 The Work has not previously been published, in whole or in part, except as follows:
5.3 Any textual, graphic or multimedia material included in the Work that is the property or work of another is either explicitly identified by source and cited in the Work or is otherwise identified as follows:
5.4 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not contain matter that is obscene, libelous, or defamatory; it does not violate another’s civil right, right of privacy, right of publicity, or other legal right; and it is otherwise not unlawful.
5.5 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not infringe the copyright or other intellectual property or literary rights of another.
5.6 The Author will indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss, damages, expenses, awards, and judgments arising from breach of any such warranties.
Section 6: The Reuse of Third-Party Works
The Publisher requires that the Author determine, prior to publication, whether it is necessary to obtain permissions from any third party who holds rights with respect to any photographs, illustrations, drawings, text, or any other material (“third-party work”) to be published with or in connection with your Work. Copyright permission will not be necessary if the use is determined to be fair dealing, if the work is in the public domain, or if the rights-holder has granted a Creative Commons or other licence. If either the Author or Publisher determines for any reason that permission is required to include any thirdparty work, the Author will obtain written permission from the rightsholder.
