Instruments for Forest Habitat Connectivity
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v6i0.42408Résumé
In places such as the boreal forest of Northern Alberta, where demands for energy and forest products are growing, it is necessary to balance economic development activities on the land with the environmental services the land can provide. Wildlife habitat for species such as woodland caribou is one such service. If adequate habitat for species such as woodland caribou is to be maintained, both the quantity of habitat and its configuration matter. Woodland caribou are in decline partly due to habitat fragmentation. For that species, connections between patches of mature forest are crucial to sustaining viable populations. To ensure continued provision of woodland caribou habitat, it is necessary to develop and use some set of regulatory instruments that will limit overall disturbance and preserve a degree of connectivity among mature parcels. The purpose of this report is to present some economic experimental results on a regulatory mechanism that is a combination of tradable disturbance permits and a procurement auction for connectivity, and compare it with the alternative of a stricter cap on disturbance permits. The usual argument is that the latter approach is less costly. We show that, although the combination mechanism can create significant transaction costs, it is not necessarily the more costly approach.
Références
Aumann, C., D. Farr and S. Boutin. “Multiple Use, Overlapping Tenures, and the Challenge of Sustainable Forestry in Alberta.” Forestry Chronicle 83(5) (2007): 642-650.
Ausubel, L. M. and P. Crampton. “Dynamic Auctions in Procurement.” In Handbook of Procurement, edited by N. Dimitri, G. Piga and G. Spagnolo, pp. 220-248. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Banerjee, S., A. M. Kwasnica and J. S. Shortle. “Agglomeration Bonus in Local Networks: A Laboratory Examination of Spatial Coordination Failure.” Stirling Economics Discussion Paper, 2011-18 (2011). https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/handle/1893/3477 (August 22. 2012).
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. Alberta’s Lower Athabasca Regional Plan. (2011). http://www.capp.ca/aboutUs/mediaCentre/issues/Pages/LARP2011.aspx (August 23, 2012).
Cason T., and L. Gangadharan. “A Laboratory Comparison of Uniform and Discriminative Price Auctions for Reducing Non-point Source Pollution.” Land Economics 81 (1) (2005): 51-70.
Dahlman, C. J. “The Problem of Externality.” Journal of Law and Economics 21(2) (1979): 141-162.
Dyer, S., J. Grant, T. Lesak and M. Weber. Catching Up: Conservation and Biodiversity Offsets in Alberta’s Boreal Forest. The Pembina Institute, 2008. http://www.pembina.org/pub/1650 (January 17, 2012).
Fowlie, M. and N. Muller. “Designing Markets for Pollution When Damages Vary Across Sources.” Department of Agricultural Economics, University of California Berkeley, 2010. http://are.berkeley.edu/~fowlie/Fowlie_draft_march_2012_correct.pdf (August 31, 2012).
Fulton, M. and J. Vercammen. “Optimal Two-Part Pricing in a Carbon Offset Market: A Comparison of Organizational Types.” Southern Economic Journal 76(2) (2009): 513-552.
Gerein, Keith. “Plan Could Cancel 19 Oilsands Leases: Compensation for Lost Profits a Complex Issue.” Calgary Herald, August 23, 2012. Accessed August 23, 2012. http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/energyresources/Plan+could+cancel+oilsands+leases/7132388/story.html.
Government of Alberta. Lower Athabasca Regional Plan 2012-2022. https://www.landuse.alberta.ca/RegionalPlans/LowerAthabascaRegion/ (August 10, 2102).
Grant, J., S. Dyer, D. Droitsch and M. Huot. Solving the Puzzle: Environmental Responsibility in Oilsands Development. The Pembina Institute, 2011. http://www.pembina.org/pub/2210 (Jan. 17, 2012).
Hill, M. R. J., D. G. McMaster, T. Harrison, A. Hershmiller and T. Plews. “A Reverse Auction for Wetland Restoration in the Assiniboine River Watershed, Saskatchewan.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(2) (2011): 245-258.
Hong, H. and M. Shum. “Increasing Competition and Winner’s Curse: Evidence from Procurement.” Review of Economic Studies 69(4) (2002): 871-898.
Hung, M.F. and D. Shaw. “A Trading-Ratio System for Trading Water Pollution Discharge,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49(1) (2005): 83-102.
Klemperer, P. “What Really Matters in Auction Design.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(1) (2002): 169-189.
National Roundtable on Environment and Economy. Boreal Futures: Governance, Conservation and Development in Canada’s Boreal (2005). http://ilm.law.uvic.ca/PDF/Boreal_Futures_E.pdf, (August 22, 2012).
Natural Regions Committee. Natural Regions and Subregions of Alberta (2006). http://www.tpr.alberta.ca/parks/heritageinfocentre/docs/NRSRcomplete%20May_06.pdf (August 22, 2012).
O’Brien, D., M. Manseau, A. Fall and M.J. Fortin. “Testing the Importance of Spatial Configuration of Winter Habitat for Woodland Caribou: An Application of Graph Theory.” Biological Conservation 130 (2006): 70-83.
Parkhurst, G. M., J. F. Shogren, C. Bastian, P. Kivi, J. Donner and R. B. W. Smith. “Agglomeration Bonus: An Incentive Mechanism to Reunite Fragmented Habitat for Biodiversity Conservation.” Ecological Economics 41 (2002): 305-328.
Parkhurst, G. M. and J. F. Shogren. “Spatial Incentives to Coordinate Habitat.” Ecological Economics 64(2) (2007): 344-355.
Pembina Institute. Lower Athabasca Regional Plan (LARP): Performance Backgrounder. http://www.pembina.org/pub/2367 (August 10, 2012).
Reeson, A. F., L. C. Rodriguez, S. M. Whitten, K. Williams, K. Nolles, J. Windle and J. Rolfe. “Adaption Auctions for the Provision of Ecosystem Services at the Landscape Scale.” Ecological Economics 70 (2011): 1621-1627.
Rolfe, J., J. Windel, and J. McCosker. “Testing and Implementing the Use of Multiple Bidding Rounds in Conservation Auctions: A Case Study Application.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (2009): 287-303.
Ross, M. “Legal and Institutional Responses to Conflicts Involving the Oil and Gas and Forestry Sectors.” CIRL Occasional Paper #10 (January 2002). http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47199/1/OP10Conflicts.pdf (August 22, 2012).
Segerson, K. “Uncertainty and Incentives for Non-Point Source Pollution.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15(3) (1988): 87-98.
Stoneham, G., V. Chaudhri, A. Ha and L. Strappazzon. “Auctions for Conservation Contracts: An Empirical Examination of Victoria's BushTender Trial.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47 (4) (2003): 477-500.
Suter, J. F., C. A. Vossler, G. L. Poe and K. Segerson. “Experiments on Damage-Based Ambient Taxes for Nonpoint Source Polluters.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(1) (2008): 86-201.
Van Kooten, C. G., C. S. Binkley and G. Delcourt. “Effect of Carbon Taxes and Subsidies on Optimal Forest Rotation Age and Supply of Carbon Services.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(2) (1995): 365-374.
Vickery, W. “Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders.” Journal of Finance 16 (1) (1961): 165-91.
Vossler, C.A., G. L. Poe, W.D. Schultze, and K. Segerson. “Communication and Incentive Mechanisms Based on Group Performance: An Experimental Study of Nonpoint Pollution Control.” Economic Inquiry 44(4) (2006): 599-613.
Warziniack, T., J. F. Shogren, and G. Parkhurst. “Creating Contiguous Forest Habitat: An Experimental Examination on Incentives and Communication.” Journal of Forest Economics 13 (2-3) (2007): 191–207.
Weber, M. and W. Adamowicz. “Tradable Land Use Rights for Cumulative Environmental Effects Management.” Canadian Public Policy 28(4) (2002): 581-595.
Wissel, S. and F. Wätzold. “A Conceptual Analysis of the Application of Tradable Permits to Biodiversity Conservation.” Conservation Biology 24(2) (2010): 404-411.
Wittmer, H.U., B.N. McLellan, R. Serrouya and C.D. Apps. “Changes in Landscape Composition Influence the Decline of a Threatened Woodland Caribou Population.” Journal of Animal Ecology 76(3) (2007): 568-579.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
The following is the copyright statement of SPPP.
Copyright © <Author name> <year>. This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows non-commercial sharing and redistribution so long as the original author and publisher are credited.
Publication Copyright and Licensing
The following guidelines and information, provided in six sections, are intended for authors (the “Author”) who are invited to write a paper (the “Work”) for The School of Public Policy Publications (the “Publisher”). The rights and responsibilities conveyed in the SPP Author Agreement will only apply once your paper is accepted for publication. At that point in the publication process, you will be asked to download the form and return a signed copy via e-mail to spppublications@ucalgary.ca. Please review the below information to ensure agreement with SPPP policies.
Section 1: Author’s Grant of Rights
In consideration of the Publisher’s agreeing to publish the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications, the Author hereby grants to the Publisher the following:
1.1 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format;
1.2 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials related to the Work; and
1.3 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Section 2: Prior Publication & Publication by Others
2.1 The Author agrees not to publish the Work, or authorize any third party to publish the Work, either in print or electronically, prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher.
2.2 The Author agrees not to publish the Work in any publication outlet which is substantially similar to The School of Public Policy Publications for a period of six (6) months after publication of the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications. Substantially similar is defined as a non-subscription, open-access publication outlet with a similar mandate/vision and intended audience.
2.3 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to contact The School of Public Policy Publications to inform them of the subsequent publication.
2.4 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to make reasonable efforts to ensure that any such additional publication cites the publication in The School of Public Policy Publications by author, title, and publisher, through a tagline, author bibliography, or similar means. A sample acknowledgement would be:
“Reprinted with permission from the author. Originally published in the The School of Public Policy Publications, http://www.policyschool.ca/publications/.”
Section 3: Editing and Formatting
The Author authorizes the Publisher to edit the Work and to make such modifications as are technically necessary or desirable to exercise the rights in Section 1 in differing media and formats. The Publisher will make no material modification to the content of the Work without the Author’s consent.
Section 4: Author’s Ownership of Copyright and Reservation of Rights
4.1 Nothing in this agreement constitutes a transfer of the copyright by the Author, and the copyright in the Work is subject to the rights granted by this agreement.
4.2 The Author retains the following rights, including but not limited to, the right:
4.2.1 To reproduce and distribute the Work, and to authorize others to reproduce and distribute the Work, in any format;
4.2.2 To post a version of the Work in an institutional repository or the Author’s personal or departmental web page so long as The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.2.3 To include the Work, in whole or in part, in another work, subject to Section 2 above and provided that The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.3 The Editors and Editorial Board of The School of Public Policy Publications requires authors to publish the Work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the Work for noncommercial purposes, and ensures the Author is credited for the original creation. This onward licensing is subject to section 2.4 of this agreement, which further ensures that the original publisher is credited.
Section 5: Author’s Warranties and Undertakings
The Author warrants that:
5.1 The Author is the sole author of the Work, or if a joint author, the Author has identified within the Work the other authors, and holds the copyright, either solely or jointly, and has the power to convey the rights granted in this agreement.
5.2 The Work has not previously been published, in whole or in part, except as follows:
5.3 Any textual, graphic or multimedia material included in the Work that is the property or work of another is either explicitly identified by source and cited in the Work or is otherwise identified as follows:
5.4 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not contain matter that is obscene, libelous, or defamatory; it does not violate another’s civil right, right of privacy, right of publicity, or other legal right; and it is otherwise not unlawful.
5.5 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not infringe the copyright or other intellectual property or literary rights of another.
5.6 The Author will indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss, damages, expenses, awards, and judgments arising from breach of any such warranties.
Section 6: The Reuse of Third-Party Works
The Publisher requires that the Author determine, prior to publication, whether it is necessary to obtain permissions from any third party who holds rights with respect to any photographs, illustrations, drawings, text, or any other material (“third-party work”) to be published with or in connection with your Work. Copyright permission will not be necessary if the use is determined to be fair dealing, if the work is in the public domain, or if the rights-holder has granted a Creative Commons or other licence. If either the Author or Publisher determines for any reason that permission is required to include any thirdparty work, the Author will obtain written permission from the rightsholder.
