Improving the Acquisition Process in Canada

  • J. Craig Stone Canadian Forces College 

Abstract

Flaws in Canada’s military procurement processes are a perennial burden on both government and industry. The release of the Defence Procurement Strategy this year signified Ottawa’s inclination toward change.  Among other things, the DPS promises to consult industry and outside experts earlier, create a specialist acquisition branch within Public Works & Government Services Canada and use military equipment projects to generate domestic jobs and growth. The DPS is a good start, but more focused solutions are required. The defence market has too few buyers and sellers to be truly competitive — especially in Canada. Government must share information with industry at every step, clearly and comprehensively, if Canadian firms are to win contracts fairly, keeping the economic benefits at home.  A sweeping, end-to-end review of procurement is also required to identify current practices that work and others in need of improvement. Preliminary cost estimates can’t be too firm because prices shift as projects develop, and all too often, capabilities are downgraded in response. Government has to be transparent about how far into the future lifecycle costs run, or stop trying to establish them altogether, so as to avoid the consequences of embarrassingly unrealistic assessments. A separate procurement organization should also be established outside of the DND and PWGSC to make better use of the people with the skills to run complex military procurement projects. Canada’s military procurement system is not as broken as its most strident critics allege, but it is coming under increasing fiscal and policy pressures. This brief fleshes out the issues that would-be reformers should take into account and surveys procedures among allied nations to offer a roadmap for change.

References

Australian Department of Defence. Public Capability Plan.

Byers, Michael. “Canada’s military procurement like a Monty Python movie,” Toronto Star Opinion Piece. 9 October 2013. Available at http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2013/10/09/canadas_ military_procurement_like_a_monty_python_movie.html#.

Canadian Association of Defence Security Industries. CADSI Policy Priorities 2011. Ottawa: CADSI, 2011. Available at https://www.defenceandsecurity.ca/UserFiles/File/2011/CADSIPolicyPriorities11.pdf.

Canadian Association of Defence and Security Industries. Canada’s Defence Industry: A Vital Partner Supporting Canada’s Economic and National Interests. Ottawa: CADSI, December 2009.

Department of National Defence. 1994 Defence White Paper. Ottawa: Canada Communications Group, 1994.

Department of National Defence. Canada First Defence Strategy Ottawa: DND, 2008.

Department of National Defence, Chief of Review Services. Internal Audit of Joint Support Ship (JSS) Project. Ottawa: DND November 2011.

Emerson, The Honourable David. Beyond the Horizon: Canada’s Interests and Future and Aerospace Volume 1. Aerospace Review Mandated by the Government of Canada. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, November, 2012.

Fetterly, Ross. Defence Procurement Reform in Other Nations. The Claxton Papers 10. Kingston: School of Policy Studies Queen’s University, 2009.

Gansler, Jacques. The Defense Industry. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1980. Gray, Bernard. Review of Acquisition for the Secretary of State for Defence: An Independent Report by Bernard Gray. London: Bernard Gray, October 2009.

Jenkins, Tom. Canada First: Leveraging Defence Procurement Through Key Industrial Capabilities Report of the Special Advisor to the Minister of Public Works and Government Services. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, February 2013.

Kirkpatrick, David L. I. “The Rising Unit Cost of Defence Equipment-The Reasons and the Results.” Defence and Peace Economics 6, no. 3(1996): 263-288.

Kirkpatrick, David L. I. “Trends in the Costs of Weapon Systems and the Consequences.” Defence and Peace Economics 15, no. 3, (June 2004): 259–273.

McParland, Kelly. “Demanding cost certainty for new Navy vessels is an exercise in fantasy.” National Post 14 November 2013. Available at http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2013/11/14/kelly-mcparlanddemanding-cost-certainty-for-new-navy-vessels-is-an-exercise-in-fantasy.

Office of the Auditor General. Report of the Auditor General of Canada Chapter 3 National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy Ottawa: PWGSC Fall 2013; available at http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/ internet/docs/parl_oag_201311_03_e.pdf.

Peck, Merton and Frederic Scherer. The Weapons Acquisition Process: An Economic Analysis. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School, 1962.

Public Works and Government Services Canada, Leveraging Defence Procurement to Create Jobs and Benefit the Economy Press Release February 5, 2014 (Ottawa; PWGSC, 2014); available at http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?mthd=tp&crtr.page=1&nid=813789&crtr.tp1D=1.

Pugh, P.G. “The Procurement Nexus.” Defence Economics 4 (1993): 179-194;

Scherer, Frederic. The Weapons Acquisition Process: Economic Incentives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1964.

Wylie, Robert. “Defence Industry and Innovation Policy’ Security Challenges 9, no 2. (2013): 107-119.

Published
2015-04-02
Section
Research Papers