Effect of Obersity on Gait Symmetry Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection

Authors

  • Cory Hendrik Meeuwisse University of Calgary

Keywords:

Obesity, Sprague-Dawley Rats, Gait, Osteoarthritis

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity is considered a risk factor for both the onset and progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Obesity, OA and mechanical perturbation have all been identified individually to increase gait asymmetry. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of obesity on the progression of gait asymmetry as a component of a diet induced obesity (DIO) OA model in the presence of mechanical perturbation. Methods: 28 Sprague Dawley Rats were assigned to a high fat, high sucrose diet or a low fat diet group (LFD). Twelve weeks post DIO groups receive an anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACL-X), or sham surgery. Pre-surgery, 1-week, 8-week, and 16-weeks post-surgery, kinetic data were collected by 3-D force plate analysis. Peak vertical ground reaction force (pVGRF), vertical impulse, and stance times were quantified then compared between limbs to quantify an asymmetry index (AI). Results: There were no differences in normalized pVGRF AI between hind limbs in the DIO or LFD group animals. Stance times decreased for both hind limbs in both DIO group animals. DIO ACL-X group animals had a greater AI compared to LFD group animals at 1-week post-surgery, and both DIO group animals had greater AI at 8 and 16 weeks post-surgery, compared to LFD group animals. Conclusion: DIO group animals exhibited gait patterns with increased asymmetries compared to LFD group animals, regardless of presence or absence of mechanical perturbation, suggesting that obesity causes distinct changes in gait patterns accelerating the onset and progression of knee osteoarthritis.

Author Biography

Cory Hendrik Meeuwisse, University of Calgary

Undergraduate Kinesiology Student

References

1. A.P. Hills, E.M. Hennig, N.M. Byrne, J.R. Steele, Obes. Rev. 3(1), 2002.

2. L. R. Shelton, Nurs. Pract. 38(7), 2013.

3. T.M. Griffin, J.L. Huebner, V.B. Kraus, Z. Yan, F. Guilak, Arthritis. Rheum. 64(2), 2012.

5. S.A. Oliveria, D.T. Felson, P.A. Cirillo, J.I. Reed, A.M. Walter, Epidemiology. 10(2), 1999.

6. M.F. Gregor, G.S. Hotamisligil, Annu. Rev. Immunol. 29. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101322, 2011.

7. R.A. Mooney, E.R. Sampson, J. Lerea, R.N. Rosier, M.J. Zuscik, Arthritis Res. Ther. 13(6), 2011.

8. A.M. Brunner, C.M. Henn, E.I. Drewniak, A. Lesieur-Brooks, J. Machan, et al. Osteoarthr. Cartilage. 20(6), 2012.

9. C.R. Louer, B.D. Furman, J.L. Huebner, V.B Kraus, S.A. Olson, F. Guilak, Arthritis Rheum. 64(10), 2012.

10. K.D. Allen, B.A. Mata, M.A. Gabr, J.L. Huebner, S.B. Adams, et. al, Arthritis Res. Ther. 14(2), 2012.

11. K.A Clarke, S.A. Heitmeyer, A.G. Smith, Y.O. Taiwo, Physiol. Behav. 62(5), 1997.

12. A.M Bendele, C. Degen, JMNI, 1(4), 2001.

13. W. Herzog, M.E. Adams, J.R. Matyas, J.G. Brooks, Osteoarthr. Cartilage. 1(4), 1993.

14. E. Suter, W. Herzog, T.R. Leonard, H. Nguyen, J. Biomech. 31(6), 1998.

15. B.L. O’Connor, D.M. Visco, D.A. Heck, S.L. Myers, K.D. Brandt, Arthritis Rheum, 32(9), 1989.

16. R.B. Brady, A.N. Sidiropoulos, H.J. Bennett, P.M. Rider, D.J. Marcellin-little, et. al, Am. J. Vet. Res. 74(5), 2013.

17. D.T. Felson, C.E. Chaisson, Bailliere. Clin. Rheum. 11(4), 1997.

18. J.W. Bijlsma, F. Berenbaum, F.P. Lafeber, Lancet. 377(9783), 2011.

19. M.Z.C. Ruan, R.M. Patel, B.C. Dawson, M.M. Jiang, B.H.L. Lee, Osteoarthr. Cartilage. 21(9), 2013.

20. J.S. Dufek, R.L. Currie, P. Gouws, L. Candela, A.P. Gutierrez, et. al, Movement Sci. 31(4), 2012.

21. A.P. Hills, A.W. Parker, Child Care Hlth. Dev. 18(1), 1992.

22. R.M. Palmieri-Smith, A.C. Thomas, C. Karvonen-Gutierrez, M.F. Sowers, Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 89(7), 2010.

23. B.J. Heard, Y. Achari, M. Chung, N.G. Shrive, C.B. Frank, J. Orthopaed. Res. 29(8), 2011.

24. G.D. Muir, I.Q. Whishaw, Behav. Brain Res. 103(1), 1999.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles