Triangular Ethnography

A Ludological Approach to Academic Motherhood

Authors

  • Mila Zhu Southeastern Oklahoma State University
  • Sarah Morrison Southeastern Oklahoma State University
  • Jennifer Bailey Watters The University of Texas at Tyler

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55016/apcf3n54

Keywords:

Academic motherhood, Feminist ethnography, Ludology, Emotional labor, Work-life balance

Abstract

This study explores the complexities of professional and caregiving roles experienced by academic mothers through the innovative framework of Triangular Ethnography. Integrating feminist ethnography and ludology, the study employs memes as ethnographic prompts in a game-based methodology to illuminate the challenges, resilience, and humor of academic motherhood. Participants engaged in randomized storytelling rounds that revealed key themes: the unrelenting emotional labor of being the default parent, the blurred boundaries between work and home, the strategic use of humor as resistance, adaptive coping through strategic play, and the undervaluation of academic labor by family, society, and institutions. The findings contribute to feminist scholarship by offering insights into the lived realities of academic mothers while advocating for systemic reforms in institutional policies and academic culture. Methodologically, the study highlights the potential of ludological approaches for qualitative inquiry, emphasizing relationality, reflexivity, and the transformative power of play.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acker, S., & Armenti, C. (2004). Sleepless in academia. Gender and Education, 16(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025032000170309

Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press.

Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. MIT Press.

Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.

Denzin, N. K. (2017). Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416681864

Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.36.2011.4.273-290

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury.

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.

Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.

Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. Henry Holt.

Hokka, J., Kurtti, E., Olsson, P., & Suopajärvi, T. (2022). The gendered affective economy of funding: Conflicting realities of university leaders and researchers in Finnish academia. In S. Acker, O.-H. Ylijoki, & M. K. McGinn (Eds.), The Social Production of Research: Perspectives on Funding and Gender (pp. 127–141). Routledge.

Mason, M. A., Wolfinger, N. H., & Goulden, M. (2013). Do babies matter? Gender and family in the ivory tower. Rutgers University Press.

Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative: Volume 1. University of Chicago Press.

Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE.

Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.

Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press.

Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Harvard University Press.

Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2016). Academic motherhood: How faculty manage work and family. Rutgers University Press.

Zhu, M. (2026). The StrataPlay Methodology: A Lorekeeper’s Game Design in Postqualitative Inquiry. Peter Lang.

Zhu, M.& Duet, C. (2024). The squirrel, omelette, and the truths: An ethnographic narrative exploration of philosophical dialogue and literacy with young learners. Journal of Education Thought, 57(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/jet.v57i1.79413

Published

2026-08-13