A Response to Rushton's "Race Differences in Behaviour"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11575/jet.v26i3.52287Abstract
In this paper I refute J. P. Rushton's claim to having demonstrated heritable race differences in intelligence, cranial capacity, and brain weight. I also refute his claim to having established that heritable behavior traits, when ordered by gene-culture coevolutionarily based r/K reproductive strategies, determine the level of human evolutionary development to be, in descending order, Mongoloids, Caucasoids, and Negroids. Refutation is accomplished through analysis of the causal chain governing explicit theory and unstated assumptions; documentation of inadequate, spurious and misapplied data sources; and demonstration of scientifically unacceptable methodology.Downloads
Published
2018-05-16
Issue
Section
Articles
License
The Journal of Educational Thought retains first publication rights for all articles. The Journal grants reproduction rights for noncommercial educational purposes with the provision that full acknowledgement of the work’s source be noted on each copy. The Journal will redirect to the appropriate authors any inquiries for further commercial publication of individual articles. All authors wishing to publish in JET will be asked to fill in and sign a Consent to Publish and Transfer of Copyright agreement.
Authors must affirm that any submission to JET has not been and will not be published or submitted elsewhere while under considration by JET.