Nursing Students’ Identification of Quality Indicators during a Third-Year Preceptorship
Résumé
Background: A pivotal part of nursing education is the ability to practice clinical skills in a professional setting under the supervision of nurse preceptors. This study was aimed at evaluating the preceptorship experiences of third-year student nurses. Method: Through a combination of survey and focus groups, both quantitative and qualitative data were used to evaluate the impact of preceptors, unit staff, and clinical placements on student experiences. Themes were developed according to Krueger's Framework (Krueger & Casey, 2014) and a triangulation design was used. Ethics approval was obtained from the Institutional Research Ethics Board. Results: Twenty-eight students responded to the survey), providing a 34.1% response rate with eleven students participating in the interviews. Conclusion: Findings from this study highlighted workplace culture, relational practice, preparedness, and scheduling concerns; providing understanding of students’ perceptions of preceptors which can help inform nursing curriculum development related to preceptorship experiences.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
