The Ground Rules for Effective OBAs: Principles for Addressing Carbon-Pricing Competitiveness Concerns through the Use of Output-Based Allocations
AbstractThe federal government’s decision to impose a minimum national price on carbon emissions has the potential to make certain businesses in the country less competitive. Specifically, there are emissions-intensive and trade-exposed industries across Canada that compete against producers from other jurisdictions where governments do not put a price on carbon. For these industries, the obligation to pay a carbon price creates a competitive disadvantage. Specifically, these businesses will face higher costs and may encounter a loss of market share to international competitors from jurisdictions that lack the same emission-control measures. That not only hurts Canadian businesses, it could also negate any emissions reductions that carbon pricing in Canada achieves on a global scale. The federal government has opted to protect such emissions-intensive, tradeexposed businesses using subsidies called output-based allocations (OBAs). This is the same system that Alberta is introducing through its forthcoming Carbon Competiveness Regulation. It also shares certain similarities with cap-and-trade programs, such as those in Ontario and Quebec, which provide free allocations of emissions permits to certain firms. OBAs are a desirable complementary policy to a carbon price as they maintain the incentive for producers to invest in production methods and facilities that are less emissions intensive. So while producers are still, nevertheless, subsidized to offset the tax burden of the carbon price, they will, under an OBA system, see greater benefits the more they work to reduce their emissions intensity. Still, to function most effectively and most efficiently, an OBA policy should follow certain key principles. The most critical principle in the design of an OBA policy is ensuring that OBAs are allocated to facilities independent of their individual emission levels, and allocated equally (on a per unit basis) to facilities producing the same product. One of the major flaws with Alberta’s current Specified Gas Emitters Regulation (SGER) is that it does not follow this principle. Rather, subsidies under SGER are allocated based on a facility’s historical emissions intensity. As a result, more generous subsidies are given to those facilities that are “dirtier” (that is, those with higher emissions intensities) than to “cleaner” facilities with lower emission intensities. Secondly, it is important for a well-designed OBA policy to have transparent costs. Including a clear accounting of OBAs in government finance reports will ensure the public is fully aware of the revenues being directed to the subsidies. Thirdly, OBAs for different facilities are best allocated using a classification system based on the product being produced, and not using more conventional industry-classification codes. Commonly used conventional industry classifications—for example, conventional oil and natural gas extraction—group together facilities that produce distinct products and compete in different markets. Consequently, this classification will not recognize the various levels of emissions intensity and trade exposure within an industry. This will result in some facilities receiving more OBAs than they should and others receiving less than they should. Finally, a well-designed OBA system should seek to be as administratively efficient as possible with minimal implementation costs imposed on government and businesses. It is important to recognize that the federal carbon price and OBAs are a new policy and that many large emitting facilities have been making investment decisions based on a previous regulatory environment. Therefore, a compromise approach may be to initially provide an output subsidy based on a facility’s past emissions intensity (as Alberta has historically done under its SGER system) and then to transition gradually to the optimal OBA system over time.
Adkins, Liwayway, Richard Garbaccio, Mun Ho, Eric Moore and Richard Morgenstern. 2012. “Carbon Pricing with Output-Based Subsidies: Impacts on US Industries over Multiple Time Frames.” National Center for Environmental Economics Working Paper 12-03. May.
Beale, Elizabeth, Dale Beugin, Bev Dahlby, Don Drummond, Nancy Olewiler and Christopher Ragan. 2015. “Provincial Carbon Pricing and Competitiveness Pressures.” Ecofiscal Commission Research Report, November 18.
Bohringer, Christoph, Brita Bye, Taran Fæhn and Knut Einar Rosendahl. 2017. “Outputbased rebating of carbon taxes in a neighbour’s backyard: Competitiveness, leakage, and welfare.” Canadian Journal of Economics 50 (2): 426-455.
Dion, Jason. 2017. “Explaining Output-Based Allocations (OBAs).” Ecofiscal Commission blog. May 24. Available from https://ecofiscal.ca/2017/05/24/explaining-output-basedallocations-obas/.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2016. Technical Update to Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Social Cost of Greenhouse Gas Estimates. March. Available from http://ec.gc.ca/cc/default.asp?lang=En&n=BE705779-1.
--- 2016. “Government of Canada Announces Pan-Canadian Pricing on Carbon Pollution.” News Release. October 3. Available from http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?nid=1132149.
--- 2017. Facility Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Program - Overview of Reported 2015 Emissions. April 13. Available from http://www.ec.gc.ca/ges-ghg/default. asp?lang=En&n=8044859A-1.
--- 2017. National Inventory Report 1990–2015: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada. April 13. Available from http://www.ec.gc.ca/ges-ghg/default. asp?lang=En&n=83A34A7A-1.
--- 2017. Technical Paper on the Federal Carbon Pricing Backstop. Last modified June 9. Available from https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/weather/climatechange/ technical-paper-federal-carbon-pricing-backstop.html.
Fellows, G. Kent and Sarah Dobson. 2017. “Embodied Emissions in Inputs and Outputs: A ‘Value Added’ Approach to National Emissions Accounting,” Canadian Public Policy 43 (2): 140-164.
Fischer, Carolyn and Alan K. Fox. 2007. “Output-based allocation of emissions permits for mitigating tax and trade interactions.” Land Economics 83 (4): 575-599.
Government of Alberta. 2012. Technical Guidance for Completing Specified Gas Baseline Emission Intensity Applications. July. Available from http://aep.alberta.ca/ climate-change/guidelines-legislation/specified-gas-emitters-regulation/documents/ GuideSpecifiedGasEmissionApplication-2012.pdf.
Government of Alberta. n.d. “Output-based Allocation System Engagement.” Accessed June 25, 2017. https://www.alberta.ca/output-based-allocation-engagement.aspx.
Goulder, Lawrence and Andrew Schein. 2013. “Carbon taxes versus cap and trade: a critical review,” Climate Change Economics 4 (3) [28 pages].
Gray, Wayne B. and Gilbert E. Metcalf. 2017. “Carbon Tax Competitiveness Concerns: Assessing a Best Practices Carbon Credit.” Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 17-10, February.
Leach, Andrew, Angela Adams, Stephanie Cairns, Linda Coady and Gordon Lambert. 2015. Climate Leadership Report to Minister, Government of Alberta. November. Available from https://www.alberta.ca/documents/climate/climate-leadership-report-to-ministerexecutive-summary.pdf.
Leach, Andrew and Trevor Tombe. 2016. “Power Play: The Termination of Alberta’s PPAs,” The School of Public Policy Communique 8 (11), August.
McCrank, Neil and Alan M. Ross. 2015. “Temperature check: Alberta makes big move on carbon emissions.” Financial Post, June 25. Available from http://business.financialpost. com/fp-comment/temperature-check-alberta-makes-big-move-on-carbon-emissions.
NASA. 2017. Global Climate Change. Accessed June 25, 2017. http://climate.nasa.gov.
The following is the copyright statement of SPPP.
Copyright © <Author name> <year>. This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows non-commercial sharing and redistribution so long as the original author and publisher are credited.
Publication Copyright and Licensing
The following guidelines and information, provided in six sections, are intended for authors (the “Author”) who are invited to write a paper (the “Work”) for The School of Public Policy Publications (the “Publisher”). The rights and responsibilities conveyed in the SPP Author Agreement will only apply once your paper is accepted for publication. At that point in the publication process, you will be asked to download the form and return a signed copy via e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please review the below information to ensure agreement with SPPP policies.
Section 1: Author’s Grant of Rights
In consideration of the Publisher’s agreeing to publish the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications, the Author hereby grants to the Publisher the following:
1.1 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format;
1.2 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials related to the Work; and
1.3 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Section 2: Prior Publication & Publication by Others
2.1 The Author agrees not to publish the Work, or authorize any third party to publish the Work, either in print or electronically, prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher.
2.2 The Author agrees not to publish the Work in any publication outlet which is substantially similar to The School of Public Policy Publications for a period of six (6) months after publication of the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications. Substantially similar is defined as a non-subscription, open-access publication outlet with a similar mandate/vision and intended audience.
2.3 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to contact The School of Public Policy Publications to inform them of the subsequent publication.
2.4 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to make reasonable efforts to ensure that any such additional publication cites the publication in The School of Public Policy Publications by author, title, and publisher, through a tagline, author bibliography, or similar means. A sample acknowledgement would be:
“Reprinted with permission from the author. Originally published in the The School of Public Policy Publications, http://www.policyschool.ca/publications/.”
Section 3: Editing and Formatting
The Author authorizes the Publisher to edit the Work and to make such modifications as are technically necessary or desirable to exercise the rights in Section 1 in differing media and formats. The Publisher will make no material modification to the content of the Work without the Author’s consent.
Section 4: Author’s Ownership of Copyright and Reservation of Rights
4.1 Nothing in this agreement constitutes a transfer of the copyright by the Author, and the copyright in the Work is subject to the rights granted by this agreement.
4.2 The Author retains the following rights, including but not limited to, the right:
4.2.1 To reproduce and distribute the Work, and to authorize others to reproduce and distribute the Work, in any format;
4.2.2 To post a version of the Work in an institutional repository or the Author’s personal or departmental web page so long as The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.2.3 To include the Work, in whole or in part, in another work, subject to Section 2 above and provided that The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.3 The Editors and Editorial Board of The School of Public Policy Publications requires authors to publish the Work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the Work for noncommercial purposes, and ensures the Author is credited for the original creation. This onward licensing is subject to section 2.4 of this agreement, which further ensures that the original publisher is credited.
Section 5: Author’s Warranties and Undertakings
The Author warrants that:
5.1 The Author is the sole author of the Work, or if a joint author, the Author has identified within the Work the other authors, and holds the copyright, either solely or jointly, and has the power to convey the rights granted in this agreement.
5.2 The Work has not previously been published, in whole or in part, except as follows:
5.3 Any textual, graphic or multimedia material included in the Work that is the property or work of another is either explicitly identified by source and cited in the Work or is otherwise identified as follows:
5.4 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not contain matter that is obscene, libelous, or defamatory; it does not violate another’s civil right, right of privacy, right of publicity, or other legal right; and it is otherwise not unlawful.
5.5 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not infringe the copyright or other intellectual property or literary rights of another.
5.6 The Author will indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss, damages, expenses, awards, and judgments arising from breach of any such warranties.
Section 6: The Reuse of Third-Party Works
The Publisher requires that the Author determine, prior to publication, whether it is necessary to obtain permissions from any third party who holds rights with respect to any photographs, illustrations, drawings, text, or any other material (“third-party work”) to be published with or in connection with your Work. Copyright permission will not be necessary if the use is determined to be fair dealing, if the work is in the public domain, or if the rights-holder has granted a Creative Commons or other licence. If either the Author or Publisher determines for any reason that permission is required to include any thirdparty work, the Author will obtain written permission from the rightsholder.