A Fiscal Framework for Offshore Oil and Gas Activities in Romania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v9i0.42571Abstract
The discovery in 2012 of a significant natural gas reservoir in the Romanian offshore sector of the Black Sea, followed by other encouraging findings, offers an opportunity for the Romanian government to update the fiscal legislation concerning taxation and royalties for oil and gas activities in order to attract more investment in this vital sector. This study analyses the opportunity of replacing the current revenue-based royalties that apply to all types of oil and gas projects with a resource-rent tax (RRT) in the offshore sector. A RRT is the most efficient way for the government to collect a share of the rents or surplus generated by the exploitation of non-renewable resources. However it can be difficult to implement a RRT for small extraction projects that are hard to monitor. We recommend that the new legislation distinguish between conventional onshore and offshore projects, primarily because offshore production entails larger investment expenditures, higher risks, and longer times to build and then to recover costs, than conventional onshore projects. A resource rent tax (RRT) should be adopted for offshore oil and gas projects because it could provide greater incentives to invest in exploration and development than royalties based on revenues from oil and gas production. Under a resource rent tax, a firm can deduct all of its operating and capital expenditures from its current revenues from a project. If the operating and capital expenditures exceed current revenues, which will generally be the case in first few years of a project, the firm can carry these expenditures forward at a specified interest rate and deduct them from future revenues. The base for a resource rent tax is the difference between the present value of the revenue stream from a project and the present value of its operating and capital expenditures or, in other words, the present value of the economic rent generated by the project. The average effective tax and royalty rate (AETRR) is the share of the economic rent generated by a project that is captured by the government through taxes and royalties. The marginal effective tax and royalty rate (METRR) measures in percentage terms the wedge that the tax and royalty system drives between the gross-of-tax rate of return earned by a marginal investment and the net-of-tax rate of return. The METRR is a measure of the disincentives to invest in oil and gas projects that are created by the tax and royalty system. We estimate that replacing the current 13 per cent royalty with a 45 per cent RRT would maintain the current AETRR and reduce the METRR for exploration and development activities in the Romania offshore sector by more than 12 percentage points, from approximately 18 per cent to less than six per cent, resulting in a significant reduction in the distortions created by the tax and royalty system. This switch would generate approximately the same, or perhaps even more, revenue for the Romanian government, as our analysis of a prototype offshore natural gas project illustrates. If it adopts a RRT for the offshore projects, the Romanian government should consider the adoption of a RRT rate that varies with the price of oil or the price of natural gas. The variable RRT rate means that, as the price of the resource increases and more economic rent is generated, the government is able to capture a larger share of a larger pie. Having an explicit formula for how the RRT rate will vary with the price of the resource also reduces uncertainty about future RRT rates if prices are different in the future. In order to smooth its revenue stream from offshore projects and to improve public acceptance of the adoption of a resource rent tax, the Romanian governments could retain a royalty on revenues from offshore production in the initial years of a project, which would be credited against the project’s future RRT liabilities. This would change the time profile of the government’s revenue stream, relative to a pure RRT, but the present value of the revenue stream would remain the same. Another complimentary fiscal instrument that can be used to achieve a similar goal as the RRT is to award exploration rights through competitive auctions. The more geological information is available to potential investors, the closer their bids will reflect the expected rent from developing the resource, allowing the government to capture without distortions a significant portion of the rents generated by oil and gas extraction projects.References
Boadway, R. and B. Dachis, 2015. “Drilling Down on Royalties: How Canadian Provinces Can Improve Non-Renewable Resource Taxes,” C. D. Howe Institute Commentary, no. 435.
Boadway, R. and M. Keen, 2010. “Theoretical Perspectives on Resource Tax Design,” in The Taxation of Petroleum and Minerals: Principles, Problems and Practice, edited by Philip Daniel, Michael Keen, and Charles McPherson. New York: Routledge Publishing.
Daniel, P., B. Goldsworthy, W. Maliszewski, D. Mesa Puyo, and A. Watson, 2010. “Evaluating Fiscal Regimes for Resource Projects,” in The Taxation of Petroleum and Minerals: Principles, Problems and Practice, edited by Philip Daniel, Michael Keen, and Charles McPherson. New York: Routledge Publishing.
Dobson, S., 2015. “A Primer on Alberta’s Oil Sands Royalties,” The School of Public Policy University of Calgary Research Papers, vol. 7, issue 7.
Dudau, R., 2015. “Principles of a Flexible and Stable Petroleum Fiscal Framework,” Energy Policy Group Commentary available at http://www.enpg.ro/details-211-Principles_of_a_ flexible_and_stable_petroleum_fiscal_framework_by_Radu_Dud_u.html
EIA/ARI, 2013. “World Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resource Assessment,” available at http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/pdf/chaptersviii_xiii.pdf
Ernst & Young, 2015. Global Oil and Gas Tax Guide 2015, available at http://www.ey.com/ GL/en/Industries/Oil---Gas/EY-2015-global-oil-and-gas-tax-guide
Henderson, J., and T. Mitrova, 2015. “The Political and Commercial Dynamics of Russia’s Gas Export Strategy,” The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, University of Oxford, OIES Paper NG 102.
Land, B., 2010. “Resource Rent Taxes: A Re-Appraisal,” in The Taxation of Petroleum and Minerals: Principles, Problems and Practice, edited by Philip Daniel, Michael Keen, and Charles McPherson. New York: Routledge Publishing.
Lund, D., 2009. “Rent Taxation for Nonrenewable Resources,” available at SSRN 1342437.
McKenzie, K. J., 2011. “Plucking the Golden Goose: Higher Royalty Rates on the Oil Sands Generate Significant Increases in Government Revenue,” The School of Public Policy University of Calgary Research Papers, vol. 3, issue 3.
Mintz, J., and D. Chen, 2012. “Capturing Economic Rents from Resources Through Royalties and Taxes,” The School of Public Policy University of Calgary Research Papers, vol. 5, issue 30.
Nakhle, C., 2010. “Petroleum Fiscal Regimes: Evolution and Challenges,” in The Taxation of Petroleum and Minerals: Principles, Problems and Practice, edited by Philip Daniel, Michael Keen, and Charles McPherson. New York: Routledge Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The following is the copyright statement of SPPP.
Copyright © <Author name> <year>. This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows non-commercial sharing and redistribution so long as the original author and publisher are credited.
Publication Copyright and Licensing
The following guidelines and information, provided in six sections, are intended for authors (the “Author”) who are invited to write a paper (the “Work”) for The School of Public Policy Publications (the “Publisher”). The rights and responsibilities conveyed in the SPP Author Agreement will only apply once your paper is accepted for publication. At that point in the publication process, you will be asked to download the form and return a signed copy via e-mail to spppublications@ucalgary.ca. Please review the below information to ensure agreement with SPPP policies.
Section 1: Author’s Grant of Rights
In consideration of the Publisher’s agreeing to publish the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications, the Author hereby grants to the Publisher the following:
1.1 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format;
1.2 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials related to the Work; and
1.3 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Section 2: Prior Publication & Publication by Others
2.1 The Author agrees not to publish the Work, or authorize any third party to publish the Work, either in print or electronically, prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher.
2.2 The Author agrees not to publish the Work in any publication outlet which is substantially similar to The School of Public Policy Publications for a period of six (6) months after publication of the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications. Substantially similar is defined as a non-subscription, open-access publication outlet with a similar mandate/vision and intended audience.
2.3 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to contact The School of Public Policy Publications to inform them of the subsequent publication.
2.4 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to make reasonable efforts to ensure that any such additional publication cites the publication in The School of Public Policy Publications by author, title, and publisher, through a tagline, author bibliography, or similar means. A sample acknowledgement would be:
“Reprinted with permission from the author. Originally published in the The School of Public Policy Publications, http://www.policyschool.ca/publications/.”
Section 3: Editing and Formatting
The Author authorizes the Publisher to edit the Work and to make such modifications as are technically necessary or desirable to exercise the rights in Section 1 in differing media and formats. The Publisher will make no material modification to the content of the Work without the Author’s consent.
Section 4: Author’s Ownership of Copyright and Reservation of Rights
4.1 Nothing in this agreement constitutes a transfer of the copyright by the Author, and the copyright in the Work is subject to the rights granted by this agreement.
4.2 The Author retains the following rights, including but not limited to, the right:
4.2.1 To reproduce and distribute the Work, and to authorize others to reproduce and distribute the Work, in any format;
4.2.2 To post a version of the Work in an institutional repository or the Author’s personal or departmental web page so long as The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.2.3 To include the Work, in whole or in part, in another work, subject to Section 2 above and provided that The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.3 The Editors and Editorial Board of The School of Public Policy Publications requires authors to publish the Work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the Work for noncommercial purposes, and ensures the Author is credited for the original creation. This onward licensing is subject to section 2.4 of this agreement, which further ensures that the original publisher is credited.
Section 5: Author’s Warranties and Undertakings
The Author warrants that:
5.1 The Author is the sole author of the Work, or if a joint author, the Author has identified within the Work the other authors, and holds the copyright, either solely or jointly, and has the power to convey the rights granted in this agreement.
5.2 The Work has not previously been published, in whole or in part, except as follows:
5.3 Any textual, graphic or multimedia material included in the Work that is the property or work of another is either explicitly identified by source and cited in the Work or is otherwise identified as follows:
5.4 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not contain matter that is obscene, libelous, or defamatory; it does not violate another’s civil right, right of privacy, right of publicity, or other legal right; and it is otherwise not unlawful.
5.5 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not infringe the copyright or other intellectual property or literary rights of another.
5.6 The Author will indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss, damages, expenses, awards, and judgments arising from breach of any such warranties.
Section 6: The Reuse of Third-Party Works
The Publisher requires that the Author determine, prior to publication, whether it is necessary to obtain permissions from any third party who holds rights with respect to any photographs, illustrations, drawings, text, or any other material (“third-party work”) to be published with or in connection with your Work. Copyright permission will not be necessary if the use is determined to be fair dealing, if the work is in the public domain, or if the rights-holder has granted a Creative Commons or other licence. If either the Author or Publisher determines for any reason that permission is required to include any thirdparty work, the Author will obtain written permission from the rightsholder.
