Can We Avoid a Sick Fiscal Future? The Non-Sustainability of Health-Care Spending with an Aging Population

Authors

  • J.C. Herbert Emery University of Calgary
  • David Still University of Calgary
  • Tom Cottrell University of Calgary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v5i0.42401

Abstract

Funding for Canadian public health care has long relied on a “pay-as-you-go” funding model: for the most part, government pays for health costs each year from taxes collected in that fiscal year with effectively nothing put aside for projected rising health-care costs in the future. But the future of Canadian public health care is going to get more expensive as the relatively large cohort of baby boomers reaches retirement age. As they exit the work force, and enter the ages at which Canadians use the health-care system more, a smaller population of younger workers is going to be left paying the growing health-care costs of older Canadians. If Canadians intend to preserve a publicly funded medicare system that offers a similar level of service in the future as it does today, under the pay-as-you-go model, eventually peak taxes for Canadians born after 1988 will end up twice as high as the peak taxes that the oldest baby boomers paid. The “payas-you-go” model has become like a Ponzi scheme, where those who got in early enough make out nicely, while those who arrive late stand to suffer a serious financial blow. This should concern both Canadians who value a comprehensive public health system as well as Canadians who value competitive tax rates: There is no reason to be certain that future taxpayers will blithely accept having their taxes substantially increased to finance health care for another, older generation that did not pay for a significant portion of its own health care. If the burden proves too high for the taxpaying public to accept, that could well jeopardize Canada’s health-care system as we know it. If Canadians intend to preserve their iconic public health system, and are unprepared to unjustly overburden future generations with the tax bill left by their parents and grandparents, provincial governments must make strong and rapid efforts to reform the health system. They must find more cost-efficient ways of managing medicine, including new approaches to eldercare, chronic disease prevention and better health promotion. If policymakers respond in time with a workable strategy and adequate effort, the substantial financial health-care liability currently faced by future generations may not be eliminated entirely, but it can still be reduced dramatically.

Author Biography

Tom Cottrell, University of Calgary

Can We Avoid a Sick Fiscal Future? The Non-Sustainability of Health-Care Spending with an Aging Population

References

Roderic Beaujot, “Projecting the Future of Canada’s Population: Assumptions, Implications and Policy.” Canadian Studies in Population 30(1), (2003) 1-28.

Gerard Boychuk. “The Regulation of Private Health Funding and Insurance in Alberta Under the Canada Health Act: A Comparative Cross-Provincial Perspective.” University of Calgary, The School of Public Policy SPS Research Papers, The Health Series. (2008) Vol 1 (1), 25-26.

Gina Browne, Stephen Birch, Lehana Thebane and Team. “Better Care: An Analysis of Nursing and Healthcare System Outcomes.” (Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation and Canadian Nurses Association, 2012) (Accessed at: http://www.chsrf.ca/Libraries/Commissioned_Research_Reports/Browne-BetterCareEN.sflb.ashx on August 17, 2012).

Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2011. National Health Expenditure Trends, 1975 to 2011. November 2011. ISBN: 978-1-55465-989-0 (Accessed at: https://secure.cihi.ca/estore/productFamily.htm?pf=PFC1671&lang=en&media=0 on May 30, 2012).

James B. Davies and Stanley Winer, “Closing the 49th Parallel: An Unexplored Episode in Canadian and Economic History,” Canadian Public Policy 37 (2011): 307-334.

Frank T. Denton, Christine H. Feaver and Byron G. Spencer, “Alternative Pasts, Possible Futures: A ‘What If’ Study of the Effects of Fertility on the Canadian Population and Labour Force.” Canadian Public Policy – Analyse de politiques XXVIII(3) (2002), 443-459.

Livio Di Matteo and Rosanna Di Matteo, “The Fiscal Sustainability of Alberta's Public Health Care System.” University of Calgary, The School of Public Policy Research Papers, The Health Series, 2(2) (2009).

J.C. Herbert Emery, “Designing the Emperor's New Clothes: Fuller Funding and the Sustainability of the Canada Pension Plan,” Canadian Business Economics 4(4), (1996), 48-64.

J.C. Herbert Emery, “Understanding the Political Economy of the Evolution and Future of SinglePayer Public Health Insurance in Canada,” University of Calgary, The School of Public Policy SPP Briefing Papers, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 2010.

Robert G. Evans, Kimberlyn M. McGrail, Steven G. Morgan, Morris L. Barer, and Clyde Hertzman. “Apocalypse No: Population Aging and the Future of Health Care Systems.” Canadian Journal on Aging, 20 (suppl. 1) (2001):160–191.

Greg Finlayson, Oke Ekuma, Marina Yogendran, Elaine Burland and Evelyn Forget, The Additional Cost of Chronic Disease in Manitoba. (Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, April 2010).

Anne H. Gauthier, “The Impact of Family Policies on Fertility in Industrialized Countries: A Review of the Literature.” Population Research and Policy Review 26(3) (2007), 323–346.

Jackson, Harriet and Chris Matier, “Public Finance Implications of Population Ageing: An Update.” Department of Finance Working Paper 2003-03 (2003). (Accessed at: http://fin.gc.ca/pub/pdfs/wp2003-03e.pdf on August 10, 2012).

Ronald Kneebone, “How You Pay Determines What You Get: Alternative Financing Options as a Determinant of Publicly Funded Health Care in Canada.” University of Calgary, The School of Public Policy Research Papers 5(21), June 2012.

Laurence J. Kotlikoff & Bernd Raffelhuschen, “Generational Accounting Around the Globe,” American Economic Review, May 1999. 161-166.

Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Generational Accounting – Knowing Who Pays, for What We Spend (New York: The Free Press, 1992).

Marc Lee, “How Sustainable is Medicare? A Closer Look at Aging, Technology and Other Cost Drivers in Canada’s Health Care System,” Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, (2007), ISBN 978-0-88627-521-1. (Accessed at: http://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/National_Office_Pubs/2007/ How_Sustainable_is_Medicare.pdf on May 30, 2012.)

Philip Oreopoulos, “Younger Canadians pay more tax, receive fewer benefits, than older generations, says C.D. Howe Institute study,” C.D. Howe Institute Communiqué. Toronto (1998).

Philip Oreopoulos and François Vaillancourt, “Taxes, Transfers, and Generations in Canada: Who Gains and Who Loses from the Demographic Transition,” C.D. Howe Institute, Toronto (1998).

Philip Oreopoulos, “Canada: On the Road to Fiscal Balance,” Generational Accounting Around the World – An NBER Report. (University of Chicago Press, 1999) 199-217.

Seamus Hogan and Sarah Hogan, “How an Aging Population Will Affect Health Care,” Chapter 2 in Gregory P. Marchildon, Tom McIntosh, and Pierre-Gerlier Forest eds. The Fiscal Sustainability of Health Care in Canada: Romanow Papers, Volume 1 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004).

William B.P. Robson, “Will the Baby Boomers Bust the Health Budget? – Demographic Change and Health Care Financing Reform,” C.D. Howe Institute Commentary. Toronto. No. 148 (2001).

William B.P. Robson, “Time and Money – The Challenge of Demographic Change and Government Finances in Canada,” C.D. Howe Institute Backgrounder. Toronto. No. 109 (2007).

Downloads

Published

2012-10-17

Issue

Section

Research Papers