The Big and the Small of Tax Support for R&D in Canada

Authors

  • Kenneth J. McKenzie University of Calgary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v5i0.42393

Abstract

Innovation is critical in the knowledge-based economy. It is generally accepted that governments have an important role to play in promoting innovative activity and R&D. Both the federal and provincial governments in Canada provide tax subsidies, and other forms of support, for R&D. Changes to various programs offered by the federal government were introduced in Budget 2012, most particularly related to the Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) tax credit program. This paper analyzes the state of tax subsidies for R&D both pre- and post-budget, and at both the federal and provincial level. It is shown that there is a patchwork of effective tax subsidy rates in Canada, which vary both between and within provinces, between small versus large firms, and across sectors and types of R&D activity. The result is a misallocation of R&D resources and a system of government support that is less effective than it could be. On some dimensions Budget 2012 was a move in the right direction, but on other dimensions matters were made worse, resulting in a reconfiguration of tax support across R&D activities that is more distortionary and less efficient. Most particularly, the post-budget tax system heavily favours small firms over large firms, and labour intensive R&D over capital intensive R&D. This paper offers a lucid examination of R&D tax support pre- and post-budget, and argues persuasively that Canadian governments should adopt a more uniform, less distortionary approach to tax subsidies for R&D if they are truly interested in setting innovation free.

References

Bernstein, Jeff (1988), “Costs of Production, Intra-and Interindustry R&D Spillovers: Canadian Evidence,” Canadian Journal of Economics 21(May): 324-347.

Bernstein, Jeff (1989), “The Structure of Canadian Inter-Industry R&D Spillovers, and the Rates of Return to R&D,” Journal of Industrial Economics 37(March): 315-328.

Bernstein, Jeff (1996), “International R&D Spillovers between Industries in Canada and the United States, Social Rates of Return and Productivity Growth,” Canadian Journal of Economics 29(April): S463-S467.

Bloom, Nicholas, Mark Shankerman, John Van Reenan (2010), “Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry,” Stanford University, mimeo.

Boadway, Robin and Jean-Francois Tremblay (2005), “Public Economics and Start-up Entrepreneurs,” Venture Capital, Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Kanniainen, V. and C. Keuschnigg, MIT Press, 181-219.

Chen, Duanjie and Jack Mintz (2011), Canada’s 2010 Tax Competitiveness Ranking: Moving to the Average but Biased Against Services, SPP Research Paper Vol. 4, Issue 2, February 2011. The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary.

Chen, Duanjie and J. Mint (2011), Small Business Taxation: Revamping Incentives to Encourage Growth, SPP Research Paper Vol. 4, Issue 7, May 2011.

Dahlby, Bev (2005), “A Framework for Evaluating Provincial R&D Tax Subsidies,” Canadian Public Policy Vol. 31 No. 1, March, 45-58.

Secretariat to the Expert Review Panel on Research and Development (2011), Assessing the Scientific Research and Experimental Development Tax Credit, at http://rd-review.ca/eic/site/033.nsf/vwapj /4_Assessing_the_SRED_Tax_Credit-eng.pdf/$FILE/4_Assessing_the_SRED_Tax_Credit-eng.pdf

Gordon, K. and H. Tchilinguirian (1998), “Marginal Effective Tax Rates on Physical, Human and R&D Capital,” OECD Economics Department Working Paper 199.

Griffith, R., D. Sandler and J. Van Reenen (1995), “Tax Incentives for R&D,” Fiscal Studies, Vol. 16, no. 2, 21-44.

Griffith, R. (2000), “How Important is Business R&D for Economic Growth and Should the Government Subsidize It?,” Institute for Fiscal Studies Briefing Note No. 12.

Griliches, Z. (1992), “The Search for R&D Spillovers,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics Vol. 94, 29-47.

Holtz-Eakin, D. (1995), “Should Small Business be Tax-Favored?,” National Tax Journal Vol. 48(3), 387-95.

Industry Canada (2010), Key Small Business Statistics – July 2010, at http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/sbrprppe.nsf/eng/rd02489.html.

KPMG (2011), Federal and Provincial Research and Development Tax Incentives, at http://www.kpmg.com/Ca/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/TaxRates/Federal%20and%20Provi ncial%20Research%20and%20Development%20Tax%20Incentives.pdf

Lester, John (2012), “Support for Business R&D in Budget 2012: Two Steps Forward and One Back,” mimeo.

Mackie, J. (2002), “Unfinished Business of the 1986 Tax Reform: An Effective Tax Rate Analysis of Current Issues in the Taxation of Capital Income,” National Tax Journal, Vol. 55, 293-337.

McKenzie, K.J. (2005), “Tax Subsidies for R&D in Canadian Provinces,” Canadian Public Policy Vol. 31 No. 1, March, 29-44.

McKenzie, K.J. (2006), “Giving with One Hand, Taking Away with the Other: Canada's Tax System and Research and Development,” C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, No. 240, October.

McKenzie, K.J. (2008), “Measuring Tax Incentives for R&D,” International Tax and Public Finance Vol.15, 563-581.

Mintz, Jack (1988), “An Empirical Estimate of Corporate Tax Refundability and Effective Tax Rates,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 103(1), 225-31.

OECD (2012), Economic Survey of Canada 2012.

Parsons, Mark and Nicholas Phillips (2007), “An Evaluation of the Federal Tax Credit for Scientific Research and Experimental Development,” Department of Finance Working Paper 2007-08.

Public Works and Government Services Canada (2011), Innovation Canada: A Call to Action, Review of Federal Support to Research and Development – Expert Panel Report, at http://rdreview.ca/eic/site/033.nsf/vwapj/R-D_InnovationCanada_Final-eng.pdf/$FILE/RD_InnovationCanada_Final-eng.pdf

Downloads

Published

2012-07-12

Issue

Section

Research Papers