Can the G-20 Save the Environment? Potential Impact of the G-20 on International Environmental Policy

Authors

  • Barry Carin Centre for International Governance Innovation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v4i0.42354

Abstract

The G-20 was created to deal with the global financial and economic crisis of 2008. G-20 leaders were successful – the crisis was contained. Should the G-20 leaders move on to deal with the most difficult and hitherto intractable global environmental policy issues? The United Nations has not been up to the task; can the G-20 fill the vacuum? This paper reviews the criteria for issues to be included on the G-20 leaders’ agenda and provides a tour d’horizon appraising the state of the global environment. It also includes some “Global Footprint” statistics demonstrating the current global unsustainable rates of consumption. Based on the G-20 agenda criteria, of ten global environmental issues, only climate change qualifies for consideration. Annex I canvasses the status of nine other specific dimensions of the global environment – Water, Forests, Biodiversity and Land Use Management, Air Pollution, Waste Management, Ozone Layer Depletion, Oceans, Fisheries and Population. The paper describes the inadequacy and fragmentation of present institutional arrangements. The concluding section provides conjectures and recommendations on a pragmatic approach for G-20 engagement with climate change and outlines a package of initiatives, with each element arguably being in every G-20 country’s national interest. Elements of the package include “no regrets” actions, eliminating fossil fuel subsidies, standards, R&D collaboration and security of supply arrangements. The G-20 could also help rationalize the jumbled melange of international environmental organizations and catalyze the creation of effective governance institutions and mechanisms.

References

Convention on Biological Diversity. (2010). About Biodiversity: Value of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.

http://www.cbd.int/2010/biodiversity/

______. (2010). Forest Biodiversity – What’s the Problem? http://www.cbd.int/forest/problem.shtml

Derviş, Kemal. (2008). The Climate Change Challenge.Wider Annual Lecture 11. UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER. http://content.undp.org/go/cms-service/stream/asset/?asset_id=1590911

Dewan, Angela. (2010). Cancun Climate Talks a Failure in Disguise. Asia Sentinel Online. 13 December 2010. http://www.asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=v iew&id=2871&Itemid=391

Esty, Dan, “Revitalizing Global Environmental Governance for Climate Change”, Global Governance, 15 (2009), 427-34.

Ewing B., A. Reed, A. Galli, J. Kitzes, and M. Wackernagel. (2010). Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts, 2010 Edition. Oakland: Global Footprint Network. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/images/uploads/National_Footprint_Accounts_Method_Paper_2010.pdf

FAO. (2010). Global Forest Resources Assessment, Key Findings. Rome: FAO. http://foris.fao.org/static/data/fra2010/KeyFindings-en.pdf

Global Footprint Network. (2010). Footprint Basics – Overiew. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/footprint_basics_overview/

______. Methodology and Sources. www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/methodology/

Government of Italy. (2009). Chair’s Summary – L’Aquila. July 10, 2009. www.g8italia2009.it/static/G8_Allegato/Chair_Summary,1.pdf

IPCC. (2007). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 – Synthesis Report, 5.4 Emission trajectories for stabilization. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/syr/ en/mains5-4.html

IUCN. (2010). Why We Need Biodiversity. http://www.iucn.org/iyb/about/biodiversity/

______. Why is Biodiversity in Crisis. http://www.iucn.org/iyb/about/biodiversity_crisis/

______. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Red List Overview. http://www.iucnredlist.org/about/red-list-overview

______. IUCN Red List of Threatened Speices, Summary Statistics. http://www.iucnredlis t.org/about/summary-statistics#Fig_2

Matthews, Adam, “A Role for Legislators”, Global Governance 15,4 (Oct-Dec 2009), p. 451-6.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2010). Overview of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. www.maweb.org/en/About.aspx#

______. Millennium Assessment Reports – Synthesis Reports; Chapter 4: Biodiversity. www.maweb.org/documents/document.273.aspx.pdf

OECD. (2008). Global Environmental Outlook to 2030. Paris: OECD.

______. (2008). Global Environmental Outlook to 2030 – Summary in English. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/29/33/40200582.pdf

Rogers, Alex David. (2010). Changing Climate Brings Irreversible Devastation Beneath the Seas. YaleGlobal Online. 29 October 2010. http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/devastation-beneathseas?utm_source=newsletter1&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=YGNewsl etter

SaKong, Il. (2009). “Achievements of the London G-20 Summit and Korea as a Troika.” Centre for US-Korea Policy, A Project of the Asia Foundation, May 2009, Vol 1., No. 4. http://asiafoundation.org/resources/pdfs/CUSKPNewsletter485x11.pdf

Sarkozy, Nicolas. 18th Ambassador’s Conference – Speech by Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy, President of the Republic. Elysée Place, Wednesday 25 August, 2010. http://www.franceonu.org/spip.php?article5123

South Centre, Developed Country Climate Financing Initiatives Weaken the UNFCCC, Analytical Note, (January 2009). http://www.southcentre.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id= 909&Itemid=1

UK Government Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2010). Cancun – UNFCCC COP16 Summit. http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/changeenergy/tackling_clima/int_climate/cancun/ cancun.aspx

UNEP. (2010). UNEP Year Book – New Science and Developments in our Changing Environment 2010. Nairobi: UNEP. http://www.unep.org/yearbook/2010/PDF/year_book_2010.pdf

UNFCCC. (2009). Copenhagen Accord. Decision 2/CP.15. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/ 11a01.pdf#page=4

Downloads

Published

2011-04-06

Issue

Section

Research Papers