A Competitive Process for Procuring Health Services: A review of Principles with an Application to Cataract Services
AbstractGovernment agencies employ a variety of mechanisms for securing goods and services from the private sector. These include posting prices, reimbursing for costs, and soliciting competitive bids. Procurement of healthcare services offers several unique challenges. The supplier can influence the quantity of services provided. It is often difficult to even specify in advance exactly what services are to be purchased. Lastly, quality is difficult to measure. Healthcare purchasers have deployed a variety of payment mechanisms to cope with these challenges. We apply the theory of procurement to the case of cataract surgery. We recommend implementing a system that combines a gatekeeper with competitive bidding among operating physicians who must perform all necessary services, including treatment for complications, within a global fee. We conclude by discussing the strengths and limitations of this proposal.
Besanko, D. et al. 2009. Economics of Strategy. New York: Wiley.
Bhattacharyya, T., et al. 2009. “Measuring the Report Card: The Validity of Pay-for-Performance Metrics in Orthopedic Surgery.” Health Affairs 28 (2): 526-532.
Brook, R., 1991. “Quality of Care: Do We Care?” Annals of Internal Medicine 115 (6): 486-490.
Brook, R., E. McGlynn, and P. Shekelle. 2000. “Defining and Measuring Quality of Care: A Perspective from US Researchers.” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 12 (4): 281-295.
Carter, G., J. Newhouse, and D. Relles. 1990. “How Much Change in the Case Mix Index Is DRG Creep?” Journal of Health Economics 9 (4): 411-428.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2009. “Medicare demonstrations show paying for quality health care pays off.” Press release, August 17, 2009.
Che Y.-K. 1993. “Design Competition through Multidimensional Auctions.” RAND Journal of Economics 24 (4): 668-680.
Cromwell, J., D. Dayhoff, and A. Thumaian. 1997. “Cost Savings and Physician Responses to Global Bundled Payments for Medicare Heart Bypass Surgery.” Health Care Financing Review 19 (1): 41-57.
Dafny, L., 2005. “How Do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes?” American Economic Review 95 (5): 1525-1547.
Dranove, D. 1987. “Rate Setting by Diagnosis Related Groups and Hospital Specialization.” RAND Journal of Economics 18 (3): 417-427.
———. 2001. Economic Evolution of American Health Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dusheiko, M., H. Gravelle, R. Jacobs, and P. Smith. 2006. “The Effect of Financial Incentives on Gatekeeping Doctors: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Health Economics 25 (3): 449-478.
Epstein, A. 2007. “Pay for Performance at the Tipping Point.” New England Journal of Medicine 365 (5): 515-517.
Evans, R.G. 1974. “Supplier-Induced Demand: Some Empirical Evidence and Implications.” In The Economics of Health and Medical Care, edited by M. Perlman. London: Macmillan.
Ferrall, C., A.W. Gregory, and W.G. Tholl. 1998. “Endogenous Work Hours and Practice Patterns of Canadian Physicians.” Canadian Journal of Economics 31 (1): 1-27.
Fox, J.R. 1974. Arming America: How the U.S. Buys Weapons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gaynor, M., and T. Mark. 2002. “Physician Contracting with Health Plans: A Survey of the Literature.” In The Economics of Health Care in Asia-Pacific Countries, edited by Hu Teh-wei and Hsieh Chee-ruey. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Glazier, R.H., J. Klein-Geltink, A. Kopp, and L. Sibley. 2009. “Capitation and Enhanced Fee-forService Models for Primary Care Reform: A Population-based Evaluation.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 180 (11): E72-E81.
Hillman, A., M. Pauly, and J. Kerstein. 1989. “How Do Financial Incentives Affect Physicians’ Clinical Decisions and the Financial Performance of Health Maintenance Organizations?” New England Journal of Medicine 321 (2): 86-92.
Hirao Y. 1993. “Learning and Incentive Problems in Repeated Partnerships.” International Economic Review 34 (1): 101-119.
Hyytinen, A., S. Lundberg, and O. Toivanen. 2007. “Politics and Procurement: Evidence from Cleaning Contracts.” HECER Discussion Paper 196. Helsinki: Helsinki Center of Economic Research.
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. 2007. Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
ISM (Integrated Service Management). 2002. “Enterprise Supply Management: Delivering Pure Profit.” Palo Alto, CA: Perfect Commerce and Dun & Bradstreet. CD-ROM.
Klein, B., R. Crawford, and A. Alchian. 1978. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process.” Journal of Law and Economics 21 (2): 297-326.
Laffont, J.J., and J. Tirole. 1988. “The Dynamics of Incentive Contracts.” Econometrica 56 (5): 1153-1175.
———. 1994. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., and G. Kosenok. 2009. “Fine-Tailored for the Cartel — Favoritism in Procurement.” Review of Industrial Organization 35 (1): 95-121.
Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., and K. Sonin. 2006. “Collusive Market Sharing and Corruption in Procurement.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 15 (4): 883-908.
Lindenauer, P., et al. 2007. “Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement.” New England Journal of Medicine 356 (5): 486-496.
McGuire, T. 2000. “Physician Agency.” In Handbook of Health Economics, edited by A. Culyer and J. Newhouse. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Milgrom, P. 1989. “Auctions and Bidding: A Primer.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (3): 3-22.
Milgrom P., and R. Weber. 1982. “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding.” Econometrica 50 (5): 1089-1122.
Monteverde, K., and D. Teece. 1982. “Supplier Switching Costs and Vertical Integration in the Automobile Industry.” Bell Journal of Economics 13 (1): 206-213.
Mullen, K., R. Frank, and M. Rosenthal. 2009. “Can You Get What You Pay For?” Harvard University. Unpublished manuscript.
Muris, T., D. Scheffman, and P. Spiller. 1992. “Strategy and Transaction Costs: The Organization of Distribution in the Carbonated Soft Drink Industry.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 1 (1): 83-128.
Murray, J., S. Greenfield, S. Kaplan, and E. Yano. 1992. “Ambulatory Testing for Capitation and Fee-for-Service Patients in the Same Practice Setting: Relationships to Outcomes.” Medical Care 30 (March): 252-261.
Murray, R. 2009. “Setting Hospital Rates to Control Costs and Boost Quality: The Maryland Experience.” Health Affairs 28 (5): 1395-1405.
Newhouse, J., et al. 1996. Free for All? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pauly, M. 1968. “The Economics of Moral Hazard: Comment.” American Economic Review 58 (3): 531-537.
Premier Inc. 2009. “Model hospital value-based purchasing program continues to improve patient outcomes.” Press release.
Riordan, M., and O. Williamson. 1985. “Asset Specificity and Economic Organization.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 3 (4): 365-378.
Robinson, J., and H. Luft. 1985. “The Impact of Hospital Market Structure on Patient Volume, Average Length of Stay, and the Cost of Care.” Journal of Health Economics 4 (4): 333-356.
Robinson, J., T. Williams, and D. Yanagihara. 2009. “Measurement of and Reward for Efficiency in California’s Pay-For-Performance Program.” Health Affairs 28 (5): 1438-1447.
Rothkopf, M., and R. Harstad. 1994. “Modeling Competitive Bidding: A Critical Essay.” Management Science 40 (3): 364-384.
Shephard, A. 1993. “Contractual Form, Retail Price, and Asset Characteristics in Gasoline Retailing.” RAND Journal of Economics 24 (1): 58-77.
Shleifer, A. 1985. “A Theory of Yardstick Competition.” RAND Journal of Economics 16 (3): 319-327.
Siciliani, L., and J. Hurst. 2004. “Explaining Waiting-Time Variations for Elective Surgeries across OECD Countries.” OECD Economic Studies 38. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Silverman, E., and J. Skinner. 2004. “Medicare Upcoding and Hospital Ownership.” Journal of Health Economics 23 (2): 369-389.
Sorbero, M., et al. 2006. Assessment of Pay-for-Performance Options for Medicare Physician Services: Final Report. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
Tirole, J. 1995. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wang, R. 1993. “Auctions versus Posted-Price Selling.” American Economic Review 83 (4): 838-851.
White, C. 2008. “Why Did Medicare Spending Growth Slow Down?” Health Affairs 27 (3): 793-802.
Williamson, O. 1971. “Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 61: 112-123.
———. 1976. “Franchise Bidding for Natural Monopolies — in General and with Respect to CATV.” Bell Journal of Economics 7 (1): 73-104.
Young, G., et al. 2007. “Effects of Paying Physicians Based on Their Relative Performance for Quality.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22 (6): 872-876.
The following is the copyright statement of SPPP.
Copyright © <Author name> <year>. This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows non-commercial sharing and redistribution so long as the original author and publisher are credited.
Publication Copyright and Licensing
The following guidelines and information, provided in six sections, are intended for authors (the “Author”) who are invited to write a paper (the “Work”) for The School of Public Policy Publications (the “Publisher”). The rights and responsibilities conveyed in the SPP Author Agreement will only apply once your paper is accepted for publication. At that point in the publication process, you will be asked to download the form and return a signed copy via e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please review the below information to ensure agreement with SPPP policies.
Section 1: Author’s Grant of Rights
In consideration of the Publisher’s agreeing to publish the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications, the Author hereby grants to the Publisher the following:
1.1 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format;
1.2 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials related to the Work; and
1.3 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Section 2: Prior Publication & Publication by Others
2.1 The Author agrees not to publish the Work, or authorize any third party to publish the Work, either in print or electronically, prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher.
2.2 The Author agrees not to publish the Work in any publication outlet which is substantially similar to The School of Public Policy Publications for a period of six (6) months after publication of the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications. Substantially similar is defined as a non-subscription, open-access publication outlet with a similar mandate/vision and intended audience.
2.3 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to contact The School of Public Policy Publications to inform them of the subsequent publication.
2.4 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to make reasonable efforts to ensure that any such additional publication cites the publication in The School of Public Policy Publications by author, title, and publisher, through a tagline, author bibliography, or similar means. A sample acknowledgement would be:
“Reprinted with permission from the author. Originally published in the The School of Public Policy Publications, http://www.policyschool.ca/publications/.”
Section 3: Editing and Formatting
The Author authorizes the Publisher to edit the Work and to make such modifications as are technically necessary or desirable to exercise the rights in Section 1 in differing media and formats. The Publisher will make no material modification to the content of the Work without the Author’s consent.
Section 4: Author’s Ownership of Copyright and Reservation of Rights
4.1 Nothing in this agreement constitutes a transfer of the copyright by the Author, and the copyright in the Work is subject to the rights granted by this agreement.
4.2 The Author retains the following rights, including but not limited to, the right:
4.2.1 To reproduce and distribute the Work, and to authorize others to reproduce and distribute the Work, in any format;
4.2.2 To post a version of the Work in an institutional repository or the Author’s personal or departmental web page so long as The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.2.3 To include the Work, in whole or in part, in another work, subject to Section 2 above and provided that The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.3 The Editors and Editorial Board of The School of Public Policy Publications requires authors to publish the Work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the Work for noncommercial purposes, and ensures the Author is credited for the original creation. This onward licensing is subject to section 2.4 of this agreement, which further ensures that the original publisher is credited.
Section 5: Author’s Warranties and Undertakings
The Author warrants that:
5.1 The Author is the sole author of the Work, or if a joint author, the Author has identified within the Work the other authors, and holds the copyright, either solely or jointly, and has the power to convey the rights granted in this agreement.
5.2 The Work has not previously been published, in whole or in part, except as follows:
5.3 Any textual, graphic or multimedia material included in the Work that is the property or work of another is either explicitly identified by source and cited in the Work or is otherwise identified as follows:
5.4 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not contain matter that is obscene, libelous, or defamatory; it does not violate another’s civil right, right of privacy, right of publicity, or other legal right; and it is otherwise not unlawful.
5.5 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not infringe the copyright or other intellectual property or literary rights of another.
5.6 The Author will indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss, damages, expenses, awards, and judgments arising from breach of any such warranties.
Section 6: The Reuse of Third-Party Works
The Publisher requires that the Author determine, prior to publication, whether it is necessary to obtain permissions from any third party who holds rights with respect to any photographs, illustrations, drawings, text, or any other material (“third-party work”) to be published with or in connection with your Work. Copyright permission will not be necessary if the use is determined to be fair dealing, if the work is in the public domain, or if the rights-holder has granted a Creative Commons or other licence. If either the Author or Publisher determines for any reason that permission is required to include any thirdparty work, the Author will obtain written permission from the rightsholder.