Examining UCH-L1 In Mouse Spermatogonia

Authors

  • Chelsea Jade Schuster Bachelor of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary

Keywords:

mouse spermatogonia UCH-L1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) form the foundation of fertility throughout the life of the adult male. However, pathways controlling their self-renewal versus differentiation remain poorly understood. It has previously been established that the deubiquinating enzyme Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase 1 (UCH-L1) is specifically expressed in undifferentiated spermatogonia that contain the SSC population [1]. Based on previous observations that UCH-L1 expression decreases with germ-line differentiation, it is hypothesized that UCH-L1 may play a role in SSC maintenance. The overall goal of the project is to elucidate the role of UCH-L1 in an immortalized type A spermatogonia mouse cell line.

METHODS: This project uses C18-4 cells [2], an immortalized type A mouse spermatogonia cell line, treated with a specific, reversible, active site directed inhibitor of UCH-L1 to examine the growth characteristics of germ cells in the absence of UCH-L1 activity. Cells were treated with 5µM, 10µM and 20µM of UCH-L1 inhibitor compared to DMSO (vehicle) and no treatment control for 24 and 48 hours. Changes in cell number, viability, proliferation (EdU), and apoptosis (TUNEL) were assessed between treatments.

RESULTS: A decreasing trend of cell number and proliferation was observed with increasing UCH-L1 inhibitor concentration. The greatest change in cell number was observed in the 48-hour treatment group with 20µM of UCH-L1 inhibitor (p=0.0659) (Figure 1). There was no change observed in TUNEL or cell viability.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Results analyzed to date show no significant differences between treatments, which is likely due to low replicate number (n=2).  However, a trend of decreasing cell number and proliferation was observed with increasing UCH-L1 inhibitor concentration for both 24 hour and 48-hour treatments.  Results of these experiments will help determine the appropriate inhibitor treatment to further examine the mechanistic actions of UCH-L1. Furthermore, elucidating this pathway may lead to new strategies to support expansion of SSCs in vitro.

References

REFERENCES

1. Luo J, Megee S, Dobrinski I. J Cell Physiol. 220:460-468, 2009. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/doi/10.1002/jcp.21789/full

2. Hofmann M, Braydich-Stolle L, Dettin L, Johnson E, Dym M. Stem Cells. 23:200-210, 2005. http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/pmc/articles/PMC3151429/?report=classic

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2013-11-18

Issue

Section

Extended Abstracts