The (inevitable) politics of public health research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55016/8m37hx05Keywords:
politics, ideology, values, reflexivityAbstract
Recent moves by the US government to increase political control over federal research funding include having political appointees make decisions on what gets funded and withdrawn, and severe constraints on ability to fund international collaborations. They have rightly incurred condemnation and protest from across the medical community. The Editors of the 'New England Journal of Medicine' have likened the scale of the threat to the Soviet-era political promotion of Trofim Lysenko’s anti-Mendelian genetics, which had decades-long devastating consequences for agriculture and the development of biological sciences in the Soviet Union. Science, they argued, should not be politicized. Yet public health, as a research discipline as well as a practice, is inherently and inevitably political. The challenge is one of combining a political sensibility with a commitment to methodologically sound, open and critical science
References
Abimbola, S. (2025) Chapter 12: Unawareness, or what we do not (want to) know. In F. L. Jephcott, H. A. Ash & C. McGuire (Eds), Epidemiological obfuscation: historical and contemporary case studies (pp. 233-263). Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9781003540755-15
Angeli, V. (2026) Diversifying outreach: Key practices for recruiting youth from equity-seeking communities into North American mental health advocacy movements. Journal of Critical Public Health, 3(3), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.55016/5sebxj82
Antin, T., Sanders, E., Peterkin, E., Lipperman-Kreda, S., Hunt, G., Brantley, S., & Annechino, R. (2026) Drivers of rural inequities in nicotine and tobacco use: A qualitative study of emerging and early established adults in California’s North State in the USA. Journal of Critical Public Health, 3(3), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.55016/0y1tg654
Bunton, R., & JCPH Editorial Collective (2024) Manifesto for a new journal: Safeguarding critique in public health. Journal of Critical Public Health, 1(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/jcph.v1i1.78305
Claypool, E., & Neiman, A. (2026) ‘What are we doing here?’: Implementation science and the politics of research as context. Journal of Critical Public Health, 3(3), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.55016/0d9ptq41
Krieger, N. (2026) Act now: Oppose a new threat to US federally funded work. The Lancet, 408 (10550), 119-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(26)01256-0
Editors (2026) The OMB and the politicization of science New England Journal of Medicine, 395(2),187-188. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe2608017
Trolard, A., Broughton, H., Doyle, R., Radford, K., Starnes, L., Ferguson, J., ... & Maricque, B. (2025) ‘Our Community Our Health St. Louis’: Learning from COVID-19 vaccine outreach. Journal of Critical Public Health, 3(3), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.55016/41887f75
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Judith Green
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles in the Journal of Critical Public Health are published under a CC-BY-NC-ND license, or a CC-BY license if authors or their funders require this. The default CC-BY-NC-ND license means that authors and users may copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in un-adapted form only, for non-commercial purposes only, and only so long as proper credit is given (as is customary in academic work). Authors retain copyright of their work published in Journal of Critical Public Health and full publishing rights without restrictions
