‘When they force a woman, it’s to save her life’: Gendered vulnerability and contraceptive coercion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/jcph.vi.79563Keywords:
contraceptive coercion, family planning, sexual and reproductive health, Africa, VulnerabilityAbstract
The global family planning movement’s entanglements with neo-Malthusian antinatalism, negative eugenics, and coercion at its foundation have been well-documented, but how eugenic ideologies and coercive tactics have evolved to manifest in current global family planning programs is less well-understood. Here, we draw from seventeen focus group discussions with women ages 15-49 in an anonymized African country to explore contraceptive coercion and eugenic logics in contemporary family planning programs through the lens of vulnerability and imperial feminism. We explore how respondents make sense of the pressure their communities face to use contraception, with results suggesting that coercion is commonplace in this context. Respondents shared a broad sense of acceptance of provider-imposed coercion, framing those who experience such coercion as vulnerable and in need of protection by healthcare providers and global development initiatives, whether they want it or not. The rationales offered to justify contemporary contraceptive coercion in this setting – poverty, disability, multiparity– often map closely to justifications for eugenic coercion that were promulgated over a century ago. These results highlight the need for a new research agenda to understand the extent of contraceptive coercion around the world, and to refocus the global family planning field on the promotion of contraceptive autonomy.
Downloads
References
Abimbola, S., Asthana, S., Montenegro, C., Guinto, R. R., Jumbam, D. T., Louskieter, L., …& Pai, M. (2021) Addressing power asymmetries in global health: Imperatives in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS Medicine, 18(4), 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003604
Amos, V., & Parmar, P. (1984) Challenging imperial feminism. Feminist Review, 17(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1984.18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1984.18
Bashford, A., & Levine, P. (2010) The Oxford handbook of the history of eugenics. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195373141.001.0001
Bendix, D., Foley, E. E., Hendrixson, A., & Schultz, S. (2020) Targets and technologies: Sayana Press and Jadelle in contemporary population policies. Gender, Place & Culture, 27(3), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1555145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1555145
Boydell, V., Smith, R. D., & Global LARC Collaboration (2023) Hidden in plain sight: A systematic review of coercion and Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive methods (LARC). PLOS Global Public Health, 3(8), 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002131
Brandi, K., Woodhams, E., White, K. O., & Mehta, P. K. (2018) An exploration of perceived contraceptive coercion at the time of abortion. Contraception, 97(4), 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.009
Britton, L. E., Williams, C. R., Onyango, D., Wambua, D., & Tumlinson, K. (2021) “When it comes to time of removal, nothing is straightforward”: A qualitative study of experiences with barriers to removal of long-acting reversible contraception in Western Kenya. Contraception: X, 3, 100063. 10.1016/j.conx.2021.100063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2021.100063
Brunie, A., Aw, F. N. R. S., Ndiaye, S., Dioh, E., Lebetkin, E., Lydon, M., ... & Ndiaye, M. M. D. (2022) Making removals part of informed choice: A mixed-method study of client experiences with removal of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Senegal. Global Health: Science and Practice, 10(5). 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00123
Brunson, J. (2019) Tool of economic development, metric of global health: Promoting planned families and economized life in Nepal. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.003
Campbell, M., Sahin-Hodoglugil, N. N., & Potts, M. (2006) Barriers to fertility regulation: A review of the literature. Studies in Family Planning, 37(2), 87–98. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2006.00088.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2006.00088.x
Center for Reproductive Rights (2017) Shifting the frame on disability rights for the U.S. reproductive rights movement. https://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/documents/Disability-Briefing-Paper-FINAL.pdf
Colen, S. (1995) “Like a mother to them”: Stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York. In F. Ginsberg & R. Rapp (Eds.), Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520915442-006
Coloma, R. S. (2012) White gazes, brown breasts: Imperial feminism and disciplining desires and bodies in colonial encounters. Paedagogica Historica, 48(2), 243–261. 10.1080/00309230.2010.547511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2010.547511
Connelly, M. J. (2008). Fatal misconception: The struggle to control world population. Harvard University Press.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
Coyne, I. T. (1997) Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 623–630. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x
Dawber, A. (2013, Jan 27th) Israel gave birth control to Ethiopian Jews without their consent. The Independent. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/middle-east/israel-gave-birth-control-to-ethiopian-jews-without-their-consent-8468800.html
Dwyer, C. (2017, July 21st) Judge promises reduced jail time if Tennessee inmates get vasectomies. The Two Way, National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/07/21/538598008/judge-promises-reduced-jail-time-if-tennessee-inmates-get-vasectomies
Giesen, L., & Roeser, A. (2020) Structuring a team-based approach to coding qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920968700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920968700
Gilliam, M. L., Neustadt, A., & Gordon, R. (2009) A call to incorporate a reproductive justice agenda into reproductive health clinical practice and policy. Contraception, 79(4), 243–246. 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2008.12.004
Greene, M. E., & Biddlecom, A. E. (2000) Absent and problematic men: Demographic accounts of male reproductive roles. Population and Development Review, 26(1), 81–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00081.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00081.x
Hendrixson, A. (2018) Population control in the troubled present: the ‘120 by 20’ target and Implant Access Program. Development and Change, 50(3), 786–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12423
Hennink, M. M. (2013. Focus group discussions. Oxford University Press.
Higgins, J. A., Hoffman, S., & Dworkin, S. L. (2010) Rethinking gender, heterosexual men, and women’s vulnerability to HIV/AIDS. American Journal of Public Health, 100(3), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.159723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.159723
Higgins, J. A., Kramer, R. D., & Ryder, K. M. (2016) Provider bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) promotion and removal: Perceptions of young adult women. American Journal of Public Health, 106(11), 1932–1937. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303393
Hollander, J. A. (2004) The social contexts of focus groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33(5), 602–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241604266988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241604266988
Holliday, C. N., McCauley, H. L., Silverman, J. G., Ricci, E., Decker, M. R., Tancredi, D. J., … & Miller, E. (2017) Racial/ethnic differences in women’s experiences of reproductive coercion, intimate partner violence, and unintended pregnancy. Journal of Women’s Health, 26(8), 828–835. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.5996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.5996
Kuumba, M. B. (1993) Perpetuating neo-colonialism through population control: South Africa and the United States. Africa Today, 40(3), 79–85.
Lee, S. (2024) The specific visuality of women of the global South in the media of the global North. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02578-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02578-x
Liao, P. V., & Dollin, J. (2012) Half a century of the oral contraceptive pill: Historical review and view to the future. Canadian Family Physician, 58(12), e757–e760.
Marks, L. (2010) Sexual chemistry: A history of the contraceptive pill. Yale University Press.
Merchant, E. K. (2021) Building the population bomb. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197558942.001.0001
Mohanty, C. T., Russo, A., & Torres, L. (1991) Third World women and the politics of feminism. Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/3150.0
O’Connor, E. E. (2014) Mothers making Latin America: Gender, households, and politics since 1825. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260768
Patton, M. Q. (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage.
Reilly, P. R. (2015) Eugenics and involuntary sterilization: 1907–2015. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 16(1), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-024930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-024930
Ross, L., Roberts, L., Derkas, E., Peoples, W., & Toure, P. B. (2017) Radical reproductive justice: Foundation, theory, practice, critique. Feminist Press and the City University of New York.
Senderowicz, L. (2019) “I was obligated to accept”: A qualitative exploration of contraceptive coercion. Social Science & Medicine, 239, 112531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112531
Senderowicz, L. (2020) Contraceptive autonomy: Conceptions and measurement of a novel family planning indicator. Studies in Family Planning, 51(2), 161-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12114
Senderowicz, L., & Kolenda, A. (2022) “She told me no, that you cannot change”: Understanding provider refusal to remove contraceptive implants. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSMQR.2022.100154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100154
Senderowicz, L., & Maloney, N. (2022) Supply-side versus demand-side unmet need: Implications for family planning programs. Population and Development Review, 48(3), 689–722. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12478
Senderowicz, L., & Valley, T. (2023) Fertility has been framed: Why family planning is not a silver bullet for sustainable development. Studies in Comparative International Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-023-09410-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-023-09410-2
Sieverding, M., Schatzkin, E., Shen, J., & Liu, J. (2018) Bias in contraceptive provision to young women among private health care providers in South West Nigeria. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1363/44e5418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/44e5418
Spivak, G. (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). University of Illinois Press
Strong, J. (2023) Troubling men: Interrogating masculinities and sexual and reproductive health in Accra, Ghana. [PhD thesis]. London School of Economics. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.00004576
Stycos, J. M. (1954) Female sterilization in Puerto Rico. Eugenics Quarterly, 1(2), 3–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.1954.9987171
Takeshita, C. (2012) The global biopolitics of the IUD: How science constructs contraceptive users and women’s bodies. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262016582.001.0001
Thornton, A. (2001) The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography, 38(4), 449–465. 10.1353/dem.2001.0039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2001.0039
Trinitapoli, J. (2021) Demography beyond the foot. In L. MacKeller & R. Friedman (Eds.), Covid-19 and the global demographic research agenda (pp. 68–72). Population Council. 10.31899/pdr1.1012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31899/pdr1.1012
Tumlinson, K., Britton, L. E., Williams, C. R., Wambua, D. M., Onyango, D. O., & Senderowicz, L. (2022) Contraceptive method denial as downward contraceptive coercion: A mixed-methods mystery client study in Western Kenya. Contraception, 115, 53–58. 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.06.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.06.014
Tumlinson, K., Pence, B. W., Curtis, S. L., Marshall, S. W., & Speizer, I. S. (2015) Quality of care and contraceptive use in urban Kenya. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.1363/4106915 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/4106915
Walker, A. K., & Fox, E. L. (2018) Why marginalization, not vulnerability, can best identify people in need of special medical and nutrition care. AMA Journal of Ethics, 20(10), E941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2018.941
Wooler, S. (2021, June 2nd) Women are being pressured to have contraceptive implants because NHS staff don’t trust them to take the pill, report claims. The Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9646173/Women-pressured-contraceptive-implants-NHS-dont-trust-pill.html
Zeal, C., Higgins, J. A., & Newton, S. R. (2018) Patient-perceived autonomy and long-acting reversible contraceptive use: A qualitative assessment in a midwestern, university community. BioResearch Open Access, 7(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2017.0037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2017.0037
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Leigh Senderowicz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles in the Journal of Critical Public Health are published under a CC-BY-NC-ND license, or a CC-BY license if authors or their funders require this. The default CC-BY-NC-ND license means that authors and users may copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in un-adapted form only, for non-commercial purposes only, and only so long as proper credit is given (as is customary in academic work). Authors retain copyright of their work published in Journal of Critical Public Health and full publishing rights without restrictions
