Nursing Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Physical Restraints in Acute Care Hospital Settings
Attempts to justify the traditional use of physical restraints have commonly centred on the need to enhance patient safety. However, issues have been progressively raised in terms of ethical considerations, human rights and the potentially harmful effects of restraints. In this view, many countries have attempted to move away from the routine use of physical restraint by incorporating alternative methods. Although several studies have explored the perceptions of patients and nurses regarding the practice of patient restraint, knowledge regarding student nurses’ perceptions is limited. The aim of this multiple case study was to explore the perceptions of this observed practice among six nursing students in their final year of a four-year undergraduate nursing program. These students had observed (but not participated in) the application of physical restraint to patients in acute care settings. A thematic analysis of the participant interviews and corresponding focus group data revealed the following: the perception that physical restraints are better than chemical restraints; consideration of, and access to alternative and less invasive measures; the need for proper restraining equipment; and training for nursing students in the physical restraint of patients. Recommendations focus on the need for training in the use of physical restraint methods and propose alternative measures to physical restraints.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).