Community-Based Intersectionality: The Changing Public Services Project

Authors

  • Tammy Findlay Mount Saint Vincent University
  • Michelle Cohen Canadian Union of Public Employees
  • Mary-Dan Johnston

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v5i3.61618

Abstract

The paper reflects on a changing public service project regarding women and intersectional analysis in Halifax, Canada. The project sought to facilitate collective mobilizations to challenge austerity and to imagine public services that meet the needs of the citizens who use them, and the workers that provide them. We provide an overview of the project, and then explore our attempt at adapting “multistrand” intersectional policy analysis (Hankivsky & Cormier, 2011) to a community-based context. In considering the challenges and opportunities associated with this work, the paper concludes that the changing public service project created space for an innovative approach to community-based research that can guide both participatory policy analysis and collective action. 

References

Brodie, Janine and Isabella Bakker. 2017. Canada’s Social Policy Regime and Women: An Assessment of the Last Decade. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada, 2007. Retrieved from http://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/pubs/pubspr/0662450870/200703
_9780662450870_e.pdf

Canada. Clerk of the Privy Council. (2014). Public Service Renewal. Oct. 2.
Retrieved from http://www.clerk.gc.ca/eng/feature.asp?pageId=73

Canada. Clerk of the Privy Council. 2012. Moving Ahead: Public Service Renewal in a Time of Change. Prime Minister’s Advisory Council on the Public Service. Sixth Report to the Prime Minister. March. Retrieved from http://www.clerk.gc.ca/local_grfx/docs/pmacccpm/6-2012-eng.pdf

Canada. Public Service Commission. 2008. The 100 years of the Public Service Commission of Canada 1908-2008. July. Retrieved from http://www.psc-cfp.gc.ca/abt- aps/tpschcfp/hist-eng.pdf

Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women (CRIAW). 2014. Changing Public Services. Ottawa. Retrieved from http://www.criaw-icref.ca/en/page/changing-public- services

___. (2006). Intersectional Feminist Frameworks. Ottawa. Retrieved from
http://criawicref.ca/sites/criaw/files/IFFs%20Primer.pdf

Cho, Sumi, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, and Leslie McCall. 2013. Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis. Signs, 38(4, Summer), pp. 785-810.

Chun, Jennifer Jihye, George Lipsitz, and Young Shin. 2013. Intersectionality as a Social Movement Strategy: Asian Immigrant Women Advocates. Signs, 38(4, Summer), pp 917-940.

Clark, Natalie, Sarah Hunt, Georgia Jules, and Trevor Good. 2010. Ethical Dilemmas in Community- Based Research: Working with Vulnerable Youth in Rural Communities. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8(4), pp. 243-252.

Cohen, Marjorie Griffin and Jane Pulkingham. (Eds.). (2009). Public Policy for Women: The State, Income Security, and Labour Market Issues. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Dhamoon, Rita and Olena Hankivisky. 2011. Why the Theory and Practice of Intersectionality Matter to Health Research and Policy. In Olena Hankivksy (Ed.), Health Inequities in Canada: Intersectional Frameworks and Practices (p. 16-50). Vancouver: UBC Press.

Four Worlds Centre for Development Learning. (2000). The Community Story Framework: A Tool for Participatory Community Analysis. Cochrane, AB: Four Worlds Centre for Development Learning.

Gregory, Tara, Diane Betzen, Dina Elias-Rodas, Maaskelah Thomas, and Tara Augustin. 2008. Guiding Principles for Youth Civic Engagement. The Community Psychologist, 41(3/4), pp. 62-65.

Hankinvsky, Olena and Renée Cormier. 2011. Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), pp. 217-229.

Hankivsky, Olena et al. 2012. Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis. In O. Hankivsky (Ed.), An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework (p. 33-46). Vancouver: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University. Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/iirp/documents/IBPA/IBPA_Framework_Complete
%20Collection_Hankivsky_2012.pdf

Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC). 2013. An Armchair Discussion on Public Service Renewal. Nova Scotia Regional Group of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC) and Nova Scotia Federal Council.

International Centre for Parliamentary Studies (ICPS). (2012). Public Sector Reform. Retrieved from http://www.parlicentre.org/Public_Sector_Reform.php

Ontario. Commission on the Reform of Ontario’s Public Services.
2012. Public Services for Ontarians: A Path to Sustainability and Excellence. Retrieved from http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/reformcommission/chapters/report.pdf

Parken, Alison and Hannah Young. 2007. Integrating the Promotion of Equality and Human Rights for All. Unpublished Report for Welsh Assembly Government and Equality and Human Rights Commission.

Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada. n.d. The Big Chill: Silencing Public Interest Science, A Survey. Retrieved from http://www.pipsc.ca/portal/page/portal/website/issues/science/bigchill

Ross, Stephanie. 2008. Social Unionism and Membership Participation: What Role for Union Democracy? Studies in Political Economy, 81(Spring), pp. 129-157.

Smithson, Janet. 2000. Using and Analysing Focus Groups: Limitations and Possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(2), pp. 103-119.

United Nations. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). 2010. Innovations And Best Practices in Public Sector Reforms: The Case of Civil Service in Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa. December.

Voices-Voix. Silencing the Public Service, n.d. Retrieved from http://voices-
voix.ca/en/facts/attacks-on-the- public-service

Waddell, Steve. (2012). Global Finance as an Action Research Domain: Testing the Boundaries. Action Research, 10(1), pp. 40-60.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-15

How to Cite

Findlay, T., Cohen, M., & Johnston, M.-D. (2020). Community-Based Intersectionality: The Changing Public Services Project. Engaged Scholar Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning, 5(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v5i3.61618