Climate Policy After Paris: Where Do We Go From Here?
Keywords:
Climate Justice; Mitigation Policies; Paris Agreement; Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR-RC); Multiscalar JusticeAbstract
In response to the repeated failures of the international climate regime to lead to adequate mitigation policies, three main options are worth pursuing: (1) repurposing, (2) supplementing, or (3) complementing the existing regime. In dialogue with Gardiner’s article “We Never Had Paris”, this article examines the merits and limitations of these three options. Although I used to support option (1), I now agree with Gardiner that it is no longer sufficient and that the severity of the situation calls for more radical measures. Gardiner supports option (2). Since time has become such a scarce resource due to the very small remaining global carbon budget, and since option (2) would very probably take a long time to be properly implemented, I support option (3). I conclude that while options (2) and (3) are not mutually exclusive, we need to get our priorities straight to make sure we make the right strategic choices while we still can.
References
André, P. (2019). Justice et limites planétaires. Quelles leçons peut-on tirer de l’échec de la justice climatique ? La Pensée écologique, 3(1), 38–52.
Barrett, S. (2013). The necessity of a multiscalar analysis of climate justice. Progress in Human Geography, 37(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512448270
Bourban, Climate Policy After Paris 96
Bell, D. (2013). How Should We Think about Climate Justice? Environmental Ethics, 35(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201335217
Bourban, M. (2017). Justice climatique et négociations internationales. Négociations, 27(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.3917/neg.027.0007
Bourban, M. (2018). Penser la justice climatique: Devoirs et politiques. Presses Universitaires de France.
Bourban, M. (2021a). Climate Justice in the Non-Ideal Circumstances of International Negotiations. In S. Kenehan & C. Katz (Eds), Principles of Justice and Real-World Climate Politics (pp. 59–88). Rowman & Littlefield.
Bourban, M. (2021b). Promoting Justice in Global Climate Policies. In É. Laurent & K. Zwickl (Eds), Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of the Environment (pp. 226–242). Routledge.
Bourban, M. (2022). Ethics, Energy Transition, and Ecological Citizenship. In T. M. Letcher (Ed.), Comprehensive Renewable Energy (Second Edition) (pp. 204–220). Elsevier.
Bourban, M. (2023). Mitigation Duties. In G. Pellegrino & M. Di Paola (Eds), Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change (pp. 721–758). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07002-0_52
Bourban, M. (2025). Taking Population Seriously in the IPAT Equation: Ethical and Political Implications of Planetary Boundaries. In T. Ruuska & T. Nyfors (Eds), Sufficiency: From Growth and Overshoot to Enoughness (pp. 197–225). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004746404_011
Bourban, M., & Broussois, L. (2020). Nouvelles convergences entre éthique environnementale et éthique animale: Vers une éthique climatique non anthropocentriste. VertigO - La Revue Électronique En Sciences de l’environnement, 32, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.26893
Bulkeley, H., Carmin, J., Castán Broto, V., Edwards, G. A. S., & Fuller, S. (2013). Climate justice and global cities: Mapping the emerging discourses. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 914–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.010
Dietzel, A. (2018). Global Justice and Climate Governance: Bridging Theory and Practice. Edinburgh University Press.
Eckersley, R. (2012). Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism? Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00107
Canadian Journal of Environmental Philosophy 97
European Commission. (2021). The Just Transition Mechanism: Making sure no one is left behind. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/finance-and-green-deal/just-transition-mechanism_en
European Commission & IEA. (2024). GHG emissions of all world countries. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/4002897
Forman, F., Solomon, G., Morello-Frosch, R., & Pezzoli, K. (2016). Bending the Curve and Closing the Gap: Climate Justice and Public Health. Collabra, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.67
Forster, P. M., Smith, C., Walsh, T., Lamb, W. F., Lamboll, R., Cassou, C., Hauser, M., Hausfather, Z., Lee, J.-Y., Palmer, M. D., Von Schuckmann, K., Slangen, A. B. A., Szopa, S., Trewin, B., Yun, J., Gillett, N. P., Jenkins, S., Matthews, H. D., Raghavan, K., … Zhai, P. (2025). Indicators of Global Climate Change 2024: Annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence. Earth System Science Data, 17(6), 2641–2680. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2641-2025
Friedlingstein, P., O’Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Li, H., Luijkx, I. T., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Schwingshackl, C., Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S. R., … Zeng, J. (2025). Global Carbon Budget 2024. Earth System Science Data, 17(3), 965–1039. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025
Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. Oxford University Press.
Gardiner, S. M. (2014). A Call for a Global Constitutional Convention Focused on Future Generations. Ethics & International Affairs, 28(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679414000379
Gardiner, S. M. (2019). Motivating (or Baby-Stepping Toward) a Global Constitutional Convention for Future Generations. Environmental Ethics, 41(3), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201941322
Gardiner, S. M., & Weisbach, D. A. (2016). Debating Climate Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Holz, C., Kartha, S., & Athanasiou, T. (2018). Fairly sharing 1.5: National fair shares of a 1.5°C-compliant global mitigation effort. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-017-9371-z
IPCC (2022). Summary for Policymakers. In P. R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, et al. (Eds), Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the
Bourban, Climate Policy After Paris 98
Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 3–48). Cambridge University Press.
Jamieson, D. (2014). Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed—And What It Means for Our Future. Oxford University Press.
Laurent, É. (2020). The European Green Deal: Bring back the new. OFCE Policy Brief, 63, 1–10.
McKendry, C. (2016). Cities and the challenge of multiscalar climate justice: Climate governance and social equity in Chicago, Birmingham, and Vancouver. Local Environment, 21(11), 1354–1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1116064
Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
Regan, T. (1987). The Case for Animal Rights. In M. W. Fox & L. D. Mickley (Eds), Advances in Animal Welfare Science 1986/87 (pp. 179–189). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3331-6_15
Ritchie, H. (2020, September 18). Sector by sector: Where do global greenhouse gas emissions come from? https://ourworldindata.org/ghg-emissions-by-sectorri
Roser, D. (2015). Climate Justice in the Straightjacket of Feasibility. In D. Birnbacher & M. Thorseth (Eds), The Politics of Sustainability: Philosophical Perspectives (pp. 71–91). Routledge.
Shue, H. (2014). Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford University Press.
Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C. P., Barnosky, A. D., Cornell, S. E., Crucifix, M., Donges, J. F., Fetzer, I., Lade, S. J., Scheffer, M., Winkelmann, R., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33), 8252–8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115
UNEP (Ed.). (2022). The closing window: Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies. United Nations Environment Programme.
UNEP. (2023). Emissions Gap Report 2023: Broken Record – Temperatures hit new highs, yet world fails to cut emissions (again). United Nations Environment Programme. https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/43922
Canadian Journal of Environmental Philosophy 99
UNEP. (2024). Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! With a massive gap between rhetoric and reality, countries draft new climate commitments. United Nations Environment Programme. https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/46404
UNFCCC. (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Decision 1/CP.21. Document FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Michel Bourban
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
